Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemm.ee

26 replies

lemmy.world

I don't think you understand what the vice president does.

145
disguy_ovaheareply
lemmy.world

Right. Even if she were President, there isn’t a single change that she could make that couldn’t be immediately undone by Trump and a Republican Congress in January.

64
kopasz7reply
lemmy.world

Try un-eating a cake, or undoing corporal punishment. My point is, not all things are reversible.

-5

Now I imagined Harris spanking Trump while stuffing her face with cake, so thanks for the visual I guess.

6
disguy_ovaheareply
lemmy.world

Biden could pardon prisoners or charged individuals without Trump’s say. He could also provide additional funding to Ukraine and Taiwan. I can’t think of any other action by a Presidential Executive Order or Congressional legislation that can’t be changed by another President or Congress.

3
kopasz7reply
lemmy.world

Military actions, release of information, establishing precedent of executive power etc.

These are just some categories, there are many fundamentally irreversible actions.

1
disguy_ovaheareply
lemmy.world

Release of information is a good one that I missed.

Military actions are immediately reversible by the Commander-In-Chief, and the President doesn’t define or control the executive power held by the office. That’s determined by SCOTUS’s interpretation of the Constitution.

1
kopasz7reply
lemmy.world

Do we have the tech to revive people or unbomb something? I believe military actions are very hard to reverse if we are talking beyond the administrative.

1
Ioughttamowreply
fedia.io

Well, she makes it ok to elect a child rapist. Oh wait, my mistake, that was the electorate. Yes the electorate, everyone who didn’t vote for Kamala, just rewarded a child rapist.

20
lemmy.world

She's the Vice President, not the President. Nor is the House, where bills start, have a Democrat majority.

Biden, on the other hand, could shoot the Supreme Court justices and it would be perfectly legal.

102
Frogreply
lemmy.ca

Keep shooting until he appoints justices that find him innocent.

23
dariusj18reply
lemmy.world

Keep shooting until the justices find him guilty

25

Fuck it. Just keep shooting. Just appointing SCJ's en masse one after another, cheyney, bush, fuck it Trump why not, get Gingrich and O'Reilly, just running down the list. A terrifying image of a line of black robed hooded politicos being shuffled down an excrement strewn hallway by secret service agents. hearing each other take their oaths in front of dark Brandon in a marble throne. Spitting and sputtering their pathetic last words. A millisecond accurate timer counts down 70 days behind him as he eats vanilla ice cream cones in sunglasses. Kamala sits by his side with a hairless cat in her lap. The footage is broadcasted internationally via a single gopro mounted to a gold plated AR-15 with an anime girl front ironsight.

6
lemm.ee

What do you mean not many years left? The supreme court gave him presidential immunity to do it.

1
PugJesusreply
lemmy.world

Biden, on the other hand, could shoot the Supreme Court justices and it would be perfectly legal.

Unfortunately, even if he wasn't spineless, that wouldn't do us much good considering the incoming president.

7

Well frankly I think the Heritage Foundation represents a clear and present threat to the United States security so you know that might actually help a lot

17

That won’t matter either. With a fully Republican controlled Congress, I’m absolutely expecting them to expand and pack the Supreme Court this term.

2
ayyy
sh.itjust.works

Please tell me who writes laws in the United States. I’ll wait.

9

Businesses. Oops, I mean the people the businesses pay to write them... Wait, aren't those just contract labor? So yeah businesses

1

You reached the end

You still have time in office 😁 | Spyke