Spyke

@[email protected] A for-profit corporation that absolutely loathes feedback from end users and community members, except when it's dripping with praise for their latest attempt to appease techbro capitalists, is cutting off an avenue for feedback on a platform largely populated by people who violently hate techbro capitalism. I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner.

54

How did this even happen? Is Mozilla made up entirely of people who didn't get accepted by google?

11

Mozilla is less worse than Google et al, but let's be frank - we need a community-developed browser. Enough of this corporate bullshit.

39
mander.xyz

This is genuinely great, specially since they're using their own web engine. Thanks for sharing, I'll keep a closer eye at the project.

8

NP! I'd argue Ladybird as well, but given how much donations they're taking from corporate already.... Doubt they'll keep as a 'for the people' browser

5
mathstodon.xyz

@[email protected] I left Mozilla after a decade of working at the Foundation because it was more than obvious that it had no idea wtf it was doing and they were no longer aligned with my moral compass. And they've just kept on reinforcing that over and over the last few years.

18
Pomaxreply
mathstodon.xyz

@Dindonmasker sorry, are you trying to blame individual contributor for the years long failing of the executive team? Because that's what it sounds like, and that'd be quite an amazingly short-sighted thing to say, so I hope that's not what you're saying.

14
sh.itjust.works

No? I'm just saying that maybe whoever cared more before are no longer there. I have no idea of the structure of mozilla management but if something changed it's because people changed.

7

@Dindonmasker unfortunately it's worse than that, the people who cared the most absolutely changed, but not by leaving. Instead they were put at the top, and ran things into the ground.

4

@[email protected] Oh, I hadn't heard… I.. I just don't get how Mozilla keeps making these choices that burn community goodwill.

But your comic is a fun, lighthearted way to represent it. One day that fox of fire will have a good caretaker.

13

@[email protected] Mozilla has become kind of a clown I will admit. But its not 100% evil like Google. Its close, but there's still some traces of goodness left. Or they would embrace webextensions v3 without caring.

11
kbalreply
fedia.io

2017 and 2021 it stayed mostly stable at 190 million users

Interesting that they almost managed to stop the decline for a few years there. In 2024 after the recent string of nonsensical decisions it's down to 158 million.

4
lemmy.world

Mozilla are doing the same AI integration as all the other browsers, so lemmings have decided that Mozilla is evil now.

10
lemm.ee

Which is so stupid. Only a good browser with AI can stop a dead internet filled with AI junk.

9

It's an arms race. But now the arms go off randomly and sometimes shoot things behind you. But corporate has spent so much money on it that we can't turn back now

3

@[email protected] You can follow the link in the ref and read comments: it's about a leadership decision of Mozilla to close their Mastodon instance. They do this while they invest a lot on AI.
In short, it's Mozilla governance that is going more and more full speed into a "capitalism tech bro" mindset, at the cost of a more and more visible departure of the Free/Libre software community. A decision that I qualify of them being clowns, now. And I parody the meme https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/putting-on-clown-makeup for that.

7

I do, but it's also a shame that mozilla.social is shutting down.

3

@[email protected] Browsers based on Gecko Firefox and Chrome Blink

are compromised, ecause both companies updating the main build are either becoming, or are ad companies.

Switching to browser based on Webkit is a good idea for long term privacy.

1
fadrienn.irlnc.org

@davidrevoy Tiens, je viens de te voir repartager cette image, et ça me fait penser : est-ce qu'elle ne pourrait pas avoir sa place dans framamèmes ? Il me semble qu'elle irait plutôt bien à côté des images de @gee, non ?

0
framapiaf.org

@elzen @gee Oh peut-être pas, elle est trop centré sur Firefox comparé au meme originel. Et puis j'aime bien l'unité qu'a Framameme avec que les dessin de Gee pour le moment. Je voudrai pas casser cette unité. Mais par contre, je suis curieux du code de Framameme, pour voir si il y aurait moyen de l'utiliser pour redialoguer ou faire de la trad de BD courte comme les miniFantasyTheatre. C'est canon comme petit logiciel en ligne tout ça.

0
framapiaf.org

@[email protected] I feel sorry in advance if another meaning than "Mozilla leadership once again are making clown things" can be interpreted from this drawing.

If it is hurting a community. That's not my intention at all with this comic.

Also, if it has something to do with the makeup symbols or the colors of the hair, it is just inspired/inherited from the original meme (src: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/putting-on-clown-makeup ).

Thank you for pointing it, I hope my answer will participate to disambiguate anything wrong.

2
Liohreply
social.anoxinon.de

@[email protected] thanks for pointing that out. I did not see the reference and I also did not know the original meme until know (which I think is already quite offensive in itself). I think posts like this are a hit in the face of the queer community and I just don't like them.

-2

Bruder / Schwester das ist ein uraltes Meme, einen Clown beinhaltend, ka was du da reininterpretierst, aber mit falscher Repräsentation von queeren Menschen hat das nix zu tun

3

@[email protected] I sincerly feel sorry to read it. I hope you'll forgive me for haven't been able to anticipate this particular side effect for the audience not knowing the original meme, or not clicking on the ref. 😔

I really thought it would be read just as a tiny joke in front of a news I had hard time to cope (something that happens too often with Mozilla).

2