Spyke
lemm.ee

From Musk… against Ukraine.

I hope that message is played loud and wide here in the US. Hell, in Europe too for that matter.

137

If it was true. But surely we are not believing this dictator at face value with no proof whatsoever, right? Right?

6
tal
lemmy.today

Setting aside the question of whether he's actually going to take the thing into a fight, I don't see how you'd get much more out of it than acting as a technical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_(vehicle)

A technical, known as a non-standard tactical vehicle (NSTV) in United States military parlance, is a light improvised fighting vehicle, typically an open-backed civilian pickup truck or four-wheel drive vehicle modified to mount SALWs and heavy weaponry, such as a machine gun, automatic grenade launcher, anti-aircraft autocannon, rotary cannon, anti-tank weapon, anti-tank gun, ATGM, mortar, multiple rocket launcher, recoilless rifle, or other support weapon (somewhat like a light military gun truck or potentially even a self-propelled gun), etc.

Technicals fill the niche of traditional light cavalry. Generally costing much less than purpose-built combat vehicles, the major asset of technicals is speed and mobility, as well as their ability to strike from unexpected directions with automatic fire and light troop deployment. Further, the reliability of vehicles such as the Toyota Hilux is useful for forces that lack the repair-related infrastructure of a conventional military on land. However, in direct engagements they are no match for heavier vehicles, such as tanks or other armored fighting vehicles, and they are mostly helpless against any air support from a proper military. [citation needed]

The Cybertruck is a light truck. It's got no armor, no relevant sensors. It's not tracked, which probably isn't the end of the world. The only notable thing about it is that runs on electricity, but in a battlefield context, my bet is that it's easier to get ahold of fuel than electricity. I guess you don't have to worry about fuel in a tank catching on fire, but lithium makes for exciting reactions too -- I kind of doubt that the battery cases deal well with being ruptured. Militaries are generally using ICEs, not EVs, today.

I'd say that a Hummvee is a considerably-better-suited vehicle in that category, and nobody is going to make a big deal out of taking a Hummvee into a fight.

48
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.zip

So ....positives:

Its quite fast compared to most other technicals, on an undamaged road.

Its nearly silent.

Air Conditioning.

You can cut vegetables for meal prep with the frunk.

. .. ...

Ok negatives:

Unless they wrap or paint it, it is extremely shiny and highly visible.

Also, it is no longer silent once you start unloading with a rear mounted Kord or PKM.

It is significantly heavier than a similarly sized truck, not great for mud or crossing a structurally dubious bridge.

It can't offroad for shit in actually difficult or broken terrain, we've seen many of these things completely break their axels over curbs or collisions that most modern SUVs would be able to drive away from.

Its functionally totally unarmored.

It will probably explode/go up in flames if shot.

Also, if its electrical systems are sufficiently damaged, it will lock you out, or in.

It may or may not just stop working, or prevent itself from turning on fully if it decides to do a software update and has connectivity issues.

If the doors are damaged or your stupid key fob thing breaks, the door 'handles' are by default flush with the door panel and you cannot actually enter the vehicle.

If the central touch screen is say, shot, or maybe just bumped and cracked by an ammo box... probably you also cannot even get the thing to start.

33
jonnereply
infosec.pub

Also, once you're close to the front line, where are you going to charge this thing? There's definitely no fast chargers, and if you do find a house with a working 220v outlet you're a sitting duck for the next 8 hours or so.

Ukrainians have been using electric bikes and scooters successfully, but a whole EV is another kettle of fish.

15
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.zip

Conceivably they could macgyver together a diesel generator/transformer combo unit into an electrical cable that can charge a tesla?

Maybe?

I used to have a survival/backup battery/transformer combo that could be charged from portable solar panels or a wall outlet, and while I have no idea of their availability or price in Russia and Ukraine, I know there diesel generator/transformer/battery combo units or sets.

Recharging a Tesla off of solar would require basically a football field sized solar panel array though rofl, a very static and fragile target

5
jonnereply
infosec.pub

Yeah, then you need to transport a generator and fuel to wherever you're charging it, so you're not getting away from the same logistics issues you'd have with a Toyota Hilux.

I can only see this as a ploy to get the all time high post on r/shittytechnicals, if that still exists.

5

I mean, probably it is near the top of shittiest in terms of cost and combat and logistical effectiveness...

But not on the pure aesthetics of utterly cobbled together garbage from a homeless shelter metric.

It can still get worse:

Doesn't have a cope cage yet. Is not rusted from ambient humidity or rain yet. Panels seem to be flush, that'll likely change fairly quickly. Random bits of it have not yet flown off at highway speeds yet.

Finally, the funniest possible things that could happen:

Ukraine hacks the thing remotely and autopilots it, empty, to crash into a jet at a nearby airfield, or a known location with a ballistic missile inbound, or just drives it off a cliff, etc.

2

I mean, if you could get a slave cable adapter you could probably charge it off of any nearby military vehicle...

But then you're still running another vehicle, idle, to charge it.

4
psudreply
aussie.zone

8 hours

More like 3 days. A Tesla 3 standard range takes 10 hours on 240V @15A

Cybertrucks have big batteries

1

Oh yeah, sure, I meant to get some range to at least get away from the immediate front line.

1

If you slam any of the doors shut you won't be able to open them again.

7
talreply
lemmy.today

Oh, the noise is a good point. I do recall reading an article about use of EVs talking about potential utility for reconnaissance. Fair enough.

5
snooggumsreply
midwest.social

Not really. Vehicles of that size are not stealthy from a visual perspective, and far enough away to avoid visual detection makes it likely that engine sound isn't going to give it away. Plus the limted range and lack of offroad ability makes it worse than something as simple as a motorcycle.

Now and electric motorcycle would be small and mobile enough to get close enough for the reduced sound to let it get a little closer. But at that point drones are far, far superior for reconnaissance.

6

I could have sworn either the Abrams X or the Black Panther have an optional electric only mode, with onboard batteries that charge from the main engine, to allow either a moderate ability to move significantly more quietly or basically idle/hunker down at near silence.

While a tank being moved by a batteries is still quite loud up close, not using the incredibly loud engines would make it harder to hear from a decent distance away and could have legitimate tactical uses.

Also apparently Ola has made and will be selling a 120mph capable fully electric motorcycle in SE Asia: https://www.olaelectric.com/motorcycles

2

Not to worry a drone with a spritzer bottle will deactivate it quickly.

2
Rosereply
lemmy.world

Its main strength is that Ukraine would probably want to have Kadyrov's personal Cybertruck as a trophy, so they'd be careful not to destroy it.

18
IsoKieroreply
sopuli.xyz

While that might play a very small part on their strategy I don't think anyone in Ukraine thinks twice before shooting it should the situation really need it. It would make a nice trophy, agreed, but I think the mentality is that if it doesn't burn then nice and even if it does the charred remains are still a trophy and a big PR win via social media.

14

Yeah, I vote for charred remains of the cyber truck being displayed in Kyiv.

8

But since Kadyrov might be inside, they might just make sure to save the video of blowing it up with egregious firepower. Even if he's not inside, it's a nice fuck you to all involved.

5
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.zip

Does a fully charged CyberTruck have enough range to drive from... wherever it is, to say... Kursk?

It would be the funniest thing in a while if Ukraine managed to hack into the Autopilot and tell the thing to drive itself across the frontline to be captured.

1
gazterreply
aussie.zone

Just because I don't really know the geography there, I thought I'd look it up. Sticker range on the cybertruck is apparently 500km, which (as the crow flies) would get you from Moscow to Kursk, or from Kursk to Kyiv.

3

Tesla sticker ranges are optimistic. You can achieve them if you drive slowly, but not at highway speed

1

The cyber truck has a big ass sunroof that'll probably shatter if he opens up with that 50 cal

4
thelemmy.club

Are republicans just openly supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine now?

44

Plus it fits Kadyrov perfectly to pretend having received something directly from a "big company leader". He used to try and woo these kind of business people when he wasn't sanctioned.

Musk won't deny it probably simply because it fits with his current political alignments to ignore anything anti-Ukrainian.

10
lemmy.world

His daughter went trans so he went full South Africa.

Since the US is so capitalist they said anyone with enough money gets to rule. Money rules elections… So here we are…

32
lemmy.world

Explain what? That it’s so stressful treating something that you spend millions to talk shit on said treatment?

So you sign off on it why? Then say you were “tricked” why? You think his kid got treatment without consent?

10

Stress as a parent? Dude saw his daughter maybe once a month. He'd tossed her aside long before she came out

14
SkyezOpenreply
lemmy.world

That man has received most of his fortune from being a Twitter PR person.

Not the emerald mines?

11

The part where his family was already rich from an emerald mine and other exploitative shit, and that he has done nothing but lose money on Twitter.

1
Kazumarareply
discuss.tchncs.de

That can be an extremely stressful thing to happen to a parent.

Only an involved one, not so much an absentee father, who seems to be mostly concerned with spreading his genes. He's at 12 children now.

3

On the flip side he's a horrible and absent father so he seems to think that the only thing a man contributes that affects the children is his sperm.

2

This is what I see a lot of from Elon supporters - holding him to a much lower standard than themselves. You say you have a similar situation, but then you still recognize that Putin is utter and complete shit. Well, Elon doesn't and uses his child's transition as an excuse to believe all sorts of horrible things. You can feel free to look down on him and would be correct to do so.

3
andzreply
lemmy.world

Here's an idea - try some empathy instead of whatever this "it sure shifted me to a conservative direction.." bullshit is.

It's not really all that believable that any normal person would behave like you say you did, but in case you're actually serious I feel sorry for your child. Nobody deserves shit like that from their own parents.

2
sh.itjust.works

"Shifted me to a conservative direction" is just a euphemism for "I'm a bad person, and parent" in this case

3

No. Do you have a serious case of anger management issues? You sure sound like it.

"I truly don't want to.." yeah I bet you really don't want to.

1
Socsareply
sh.itjust.works

How in the ever loving fuck would being a supportive and loving parent to your child be "extremely stressful?"

Bro holy shit, you are so close to realizing that you might just be wrong, and instead you double down?

2
lemmy.world

There's no way Musk personally sent Kadryov a cybertruck. And Kadyrov is under sanctions so I doubt that would be legal anyways.

14
rsurireply
lemmy.world

He's said nothing about it on his twitter, instead doing the usual boosting of misinformation about US politics. The silence says a lot.

1
lemmy.world

Dude there's no way he mailed Kadyrov a cybertruck, the fact that he did not explicitly deny it doesn't mean much at all. It's not like he's been dodging questions about it, it's just one of many things he hasn't commented on. The article from The Independent says Kadyrov thanked Musk for inventing the vehicle.

5
Rosereply
lemmy.world

That reporting is inaccurate if so. If you follow the Ukrainian news story link in the OP, you can click on the link to Kadyrov's Telegram post and machine translate it or ask a Russian speaker translate its first sentence. It literally says "received from Musk".

1

I think that's just a figure of speech, like if I order something from Amazon I could say "Bezos just sent me this"

1

Thank goodness we've armed the Ukrainians with our finest puddles and small hills. Just in time for winter too....

33

I mean, Musk is so stupid that he probably doesn't even realize he's helping the Ukrainians.

13
lemmy.world

That's only because Ukraine is winning this week. A few months ago when Ukraine was losing Musk wanted Ukraine to surrender.

29
jonnereply
infosec.pub

And if true, wouldn't this be a breach of sanctions? Can't someone lock him up for this?

14
Aulireply

I mean yes how did he get it? Elon has broken sanctions.

6

Not even "just" against Ukraine. Kadyrov is pro-honour-killing, has advocated nuking Ukraine, claimed to be sending his own 14-year-old son to fight, and has been described by Human Rights Watch as being responsible for such widespread torture that it is a crime against humanity.

7
lemmy.world

I can't wait to see the Ukrainian video of them drone striking this piece of shit lol. Assuming they even bother and it doesn't just die on the side of the road on the way to anywhere.

27
Sylvartasreply
lemmy.world

Why bother drone striking it when even lower caliber rifle rounds will tear right through it ?

2
oursreply
lemmy.world

A stainless steel monstrosity, perfect camouflage.

4
Phoenixzreply
lemmy.ca

Can you imagine how that thing will look like after a single day on actual rugged terrain?

4

The "Help! I've fallen and can't get up!" commercial pops to mind.

1
lemmy.world

Lol, that’s even more useless than their pop off tanks.

22

Panels on that vehicle are quite literally glued on and its off-road capabilities are abysmal... Enjoy getting stuck in tall grass

15

A Toyota Hilux is more suited for combat than that piece of shit.

20
lemmy.sdf.org

That thing will last about a second. Then it'll be smashed by a baseball and explode.

19

If this is true then it's only a matter of time for the collapse in Tesla sales and any commercial venture linked to Musk.

19
yiffit.net

Well. That's, uh. Certainly one way to do a marketing stunt. Giving a free car to a second rate genocidal dictator asskisser.

17
pawb.social

Assuming that Musk actually had a hand in it and it isn't just Kadyrov playing up a truck he bought second hand to make himself seem more important. Not that Elon isn't shitty, but I'm not sure if Kadyrov is notable enough for the guy to personally send him presents.

15

They previously had a public exchange in the vein of Musk and Zuckerberg challenging each other to a fight, so it could be either.

7

Can we seize Space X and Tesla paid with tax payer's funds? Force him to sale, I don't give a shit what it is. A national resource is in the hands of a extreme far right Putin/Jinping/ Bin Salman puppet. This man has way to much power.

16

Jingping is his first name, Xi is his second name. The Chinese have their second name before their first name. So you mean Putin/Xi/Bin Salman.

I'm just being pedantic here, I have no other purpose. Carry on 🤣

4

"The drone's explosive didn't go off, but when we rammed the drone into the window the trunk caught on fire."

9

The irony is that there's no bigger example of cuckery than simping for a corrupt traitor to your country

2
nednobbinsreply
lemm.ee

Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 says:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

It's a fairly narrow definition. I haven't found any cases where the USSC defines "enemy" but, given the preceding sentence, it looks like the heavily implied definition is, "Members of a nation that is at war with the United States."

Officially, the US has only been at war 5 times. The last one was WW II.

5
midwest.social

The US has extensive sanctions against Russia and Putins associates and many violators have already been prosecuted.

2

The US has specific sanctions against Ramzan Kadyrov and if Musk violated any of them he could be prosecuted for sanctions violations.

That would be separate from a prosecution under "succor to the enemy". As near as I can tell, that only comes into effect under the very specific case of declared wars and that sanctions alone, aren't sufficient.

4

Because Russia is not the enemy of the United States, its the enemy of Ukraine. At least that's what I assume the answer is.

2

They will take advantage of Ukraine's extensive supercharger network. That's a good idea. He should send all cybertrucks there.

8

I'm not sure what I expected the inside to look like, but holy shit. These things get worse every fucking time I see one

3