Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

48 replies

jeffwreply
lemmy.world

While I appreciate the effort, mods are probably gonna get mad if you keep commenting this on every post. Some of the ones you commented on don’t seem like they’re totally about Vance

Edit: actually, the posts are all about Vance. Still, not a great look to post the same comment too many times.

39

I buy old retro tech maybe ill do it as a bit of a test. Ill set the return address to a McDonald's or something.

4

Duh buy it at a garage sale then keep it disconnected and print away, or buy used from overseas. Lots of options.

3

What’s sad is that I, and many others, sit here on Lemmy ingesting such horrible and depressing news about our world today — be it housing crisis, food availability, or any number of other topics — and feeling powerless to do anything about it. It’s maddening.

I decided that in my small way I’d make an attempt to do something about it. So, on every post about Vance, I would simply post a call to action. It’s nothing big or earth shattering. Just a simple political statement.

I am pleasantly surprised at the positive reception I have gotten (the upvotes and people expressing their approval through comments). But it’s ok if you don’t like them. I guess in a way it’s like the tide of beans memes that went around for a while — I didn’t like them myself, so I ignored them.

I’ll offer you this picture of beans as a peace offering. No hard feelings. 😊

6
Hegarreply
fedia.io

I'm personally grateful to see this comment repeated and reposted a lot and hope the mods understand that spreading things like this is one of the most important reason to have an interwebs.

Keep up the great work @[email protected] !

15
lemmy.world

This.
Except peeps at lemmy get upset and say, "I thought we agreed you couldn't post just, "This."!!!"
So, there's that.

7
lemmy.ca

spreading things like this is one of the most important reason to have an interwebs

Spreading unsubstantiated rumours?

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2024/07/jd-vance-couch-memes-associated-press

Vance is a complete and utter piece of shit. There are lots of things to attack him for, actual things he believes or has done. Making things up to discredit him isn't needed, and it's definitely not an important reason to have the internet.

-2
Hegarreply
fedia.io

Making the powerful and evil into objects of ridicule is a non-violent way to rob them of some of their power. The less social capital this noted cushion enthusiast can command, the better.

Since our democracy lacks a formal process of ostracism to deal with people like this, saying "pfft, whatever you useless couchfucker" is the next best thing.

9
lemmy.ca

Then ridicule him for things he's actually done. There are lots of them. By making things up you're no better than the people spreading lies about Hillary or Obama. This isn't the road you want to go down.

1

no better than the people spreading lies about Hillary or Obama

I don't think that people with different skin color, or sexuality should be made to suffer for it, so I would suggest I'm better than most of them in that regard.

I also don't have any problem with people ridiculing obama or hillary. That's obviously fine. All politicians deserve ridicule and our society is improved when the powerful are regularly insulted.

As long as it isn't being used to reinforce dangerous hatreds like racism, sexism, homophobia etc. - which increases the danger to the already marginalized - why would anyone care?

2
dohpaz42reply
lemmy.world

It’s not about spreading unsubstantiated rumors or discrediting him (he’s doing a fine enough job of that on his own). It’s about using humor to make a peaceful political statement. It’s my humble call to action for those who are tired of this man’s bullshit, and letting him know that we are tired of his bullshit. Do I believe he fucked a couch? No. And even if he did, it wouldn’t change how I feel about him.

4

If that’s the case, I apologize. I’ll have to go back and check the ones I’ve posted on. Thanks for the heads up.

9

Many people are saying he did, but then some others have come forward to say he didn't, but those of us are just asking questions and want to know: "I don't know, were you actually there? How can you tell me he didn't fuck a couch"?

7
lemmy.world

All I know is that a lot of important people and news organizations are asking questions about this man banging his couch.

56

This is one of the oldest and most effective tricks in politics. Every hack in the business has used it in times of trouble, and it has even been elevated to the level of political mythology in a story about one of Lyndon Johnson’s early campaigns in Texas.

The race was close and Johnson was getting worried. Finally he told his campaign manager to start a massive rumour campaign about his opponent’s life-long habit of enjoying carnal knowledge of his barnyard sows.

“Christ, we can’t get away with calling him a pig-f****r,” the campaign manager protested. “Nobody’s going to believe a thing like that.”

“I know,” Johnson replied. “But let’s make the sonofab****h deny it.”

Hunter S. Thompson, 1972. Politics never changes.

41
lemmy.world

My guess is that Pedo Donnie will use Vance as a scapegoat when his campaign fails miserably.

53

He'll probably blame rigged elections for his loss. In his mind, he wants to avoid the idea he ever made a bad choice.

6

The man has never recognized an election loss, even in primaries where the result didn't really matter. What makes you think he'll recognize the next one?

5

It seems like it is useful to try to speak to the median voter and (supposed) undecideds who would be affected by this. There are lots of other publications with different perspectives. Is it bad necessarily that this one exists and operates this way?

5

He's not polling very well. The more the low-info voter types learn about this guy, the less they like him, too. He just comes off like a very creepy weirdo.

4

Man, this Steven Cheoung has some serious "you sure you're on the right team?"-vibes.

He said this about the democrats: “We’re going to beat the brakes off them, and there is nothing they can do about it.”

Does anybody else read this as "were going to make the democrats unstoppable"?

14
lemmy.world

Let's face it: JD is just plain weird and creepy and comes off like a total freak. Like something out of a movie (or a book/show like Handmaid's Tale) kind of freak.

In addition - he looks like a total spineless jackass when it comes to him saying the convicted felon was America's Hitler, and now he's Hitler's VP. Imagine that...

12
GiddyGapreply
lemm.ee

Let's face it: JD is just plain weird and creepy and comes off like a total freak. Like something out of a movie (or a book/show like Handmaid's Tale) kind of freak.

So, right down the Republican alley...

3

Maybe for their magabrained ones. Not too sure about even their normie set, never mind the low-info "undecided" voters that decide so many elections.

2
lemmy.world

“Wrong-pick Mini-Hitler Tries Hard As Obama 2.0 Makes Her Debut Unto Gushing Support and Praise”

12

“The fact remains that Kamala Harris is weak, failed and dangerously liberal, and no amount of gaslighting from her moronic, too-online campaign will erase her despicable record,” Mr. Cheung said on Saturday. “We’re going to beat the brakes off them, and there is nothing they can do about it.”

Could you talk more like a child?

6

I don't recognize every name here but yeah you nailed quite a few. Roger Stone for example. That guy makes me want hell to be a thing.

2

Stumble? He didn't get off the metaphorical sofa. He didn't get out of the literal sofa.

2