Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on sopuli.xyz

30 replies

This creates financial incentive to send these expensive soldiers to their deaths as soon as possible.

36
Sibboreply
sopuli.xyz

Maybe they just print the money. Isn't that what dictatorships often end up doing?

11

Yeah but if they send these troops to the areas that are most deadly, then they don't have to pay them for very long in the first place.

No need to print the money if you're not actually spending it.

13
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I invite them to do that. I'm sure the oligarchs will love having their local savings massively devalued, and won't support a coup of any kind. /s

5
feddit.org

As much as I would love that, probably they don't have their fortune in cash savings but most probably put it into diversified investments of some sorts.

1

I'm guessing both, so they get returns and still have an "oh shit" fund. I doubt it would be good for the oligarchs, at the very least.

Venezuela can do hyperinflation because they have a more ideologically driven elite who will ride out the turbulence. No such luck for Putin; he's a neofeudal lord and has to keep palms greased like it.

2

I wonder who would down vote this comment like I want to know if anyone really believes that any of these soldiers will receive even a penny? please feel free to embarrass yourselves trying to prove me wrong.

6
Rosereply
lemmy.world

Average is a poor metric, as it accounts for the rich who steal like there's no tomorrow in countries like Russia. Go by the minimum.

10

The minimum what? I'm pretty sure the minimum is 0 in both places. The minimum salary mandated by the government? That's just a policy, it says nothing on how realistic, widespread or sustainable it is within the two countries.

Either way I'm sure there's a perfect metric for a comparison, probbaly the kind of lifestyle you can attain with that income, but I'd be surprised to find it significantly different than this rough estimate.

I also don't believe people attracted by this prospect are economists...

2

Huh, look at that.

That's income, though, which is correct for this discussion. It's the same colour on the wealth map, and I can only imagine how skewed the raw data is with all the hidden wealth.

1
sunzureply
kbin.run

That's above median individual income in the US

Our troops get paid less too

1
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

True, and when they do get deployed, there's, like, a McDicks and a Pappa John's that deploys with them. And all the equipment is up to date and works (which is something even by Western standards).

3

$60k a year to go die on someone else’s land. Seems like a bad deal.

16
lemmy.world

Considering the average life expectancy, what does that work out to in pay per day?

7

$2.74/day

Jesus Christ, I didn't expect it to be that bad. That's Africa shit, and these are the guys that did some of the colonising, rather than being subjected to it.

Edit: Because it's not. it works out to more like $15/day, if we trust official numbers. That must be a minimum you're using or something.

It varies massively by region, though, because some of those colonies are still inside.

3

That's okay buddy, Wilshire understood the question and already answered it

2

You reached the end