Spyke
fedia.io

Who knew all you needed to make yourself above the law was appoint your own judges... The level of corruption going on in front of our eyes is astounding, they're barely even trying to hide it at this point.

165
pawb.social

They're banking on the assumption that they won't have to once Trump wins the election.

87
snooggumsreply
midwest.social

They are banking on the fact that impeaching judges is both extemely rare and very time consuming.

41
lemmynsfw.com

If the birth rate keeps declining, theoretically some day they'll be forced to implement policies that help instead of harm people. You can fight by making sure as many people as possible are aware of this.

11
jonnereply
infosec.pub

They'd probably reinstate slavery before they do that.

6

You've caused me now to imagine a reality where the stupid thing that orange asshole advocates changes from "they aren't sending their brightest" to "we literally can't trap enough of them here" and I don't like it

3
lemmy.world

Media will be picking up on that “rigged judiciary” at any moment now

80
infosec.pub

Anyone with half a brain knows it's a blatantly corrupt system having little to do with law.

49

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump

77
lemmy.world

This might be good news: instead of drawing out the case for 10 years, the judge just ruled all special prosecutors are unconstitutional. If the appeals court reverses thus ridiculous rulling, we might see the trial much sooner.

28
reddthat.com

Jack Smith wasn't appointed by the President and wasn't confirmed by the Senate. That's the reason for the dismissal. It was obviously just a partisan hit job

-126

A judge that Trump appointed throwing out a case against Trump is ruling based on partisan politics.

52
lemm.ee

Special prosecutors have been allowed through legal cases for 30 years now at least. They are settled law. Hell, they used one on Hunter Biden recently I believe.

46
FireTowerreply
lemmy.world

The fact that something deemed unconditional has happened a lot before doesn't justify it as constitutional. Only text can do that.

-14

Congress passed a law deligating the power to the AG. There was a congressional vote to put that law into place. Congress doesn't need to vote on every police officer that the president hires do they?

6

It was an OFFICIAL ACT OF THE PRESIDENCY and therefore LEGAL according to the Supreme Court!

8

You reached the end