Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on hackertalks.com

6 replies

Seems perfectly alright. I think for HDDs, consensus is you overwrite everything and you're fine. If you want to make absolutely sure you can do multiple passes, like 2 or 3 with different (random) data should suffice. There are a lot of myths around though, concerning wiping data.

I generally use the common, established linux utilities: 'wipe' or 'shred' or just 'dd' on the whole device. The Arch Wiki has a long article on Securely wipe disk. I guess nwipe is fine, too.

Terms and conditions apply if you're using flash memory or SSDs. Overwriting them is not 100% effective. But for plain harddisks it is.

7

I use a metal drill right through the platers. They shatter. Nobody cares about my dumb shit to recover that. Takes about 30 seconds per drive.

4

Open them up, salvage the magnets. Use sandpaper on the platters if you need to apply more privacy.

3

It literally takes longer to software wipe than to drill a hole as other commenters have mentioned.

Edit: make sure it's through the platters, not just the circuit board end

3

We use nwipe at the office and are happy with it. It has a dod preset or you can stick with prng. We usually use prng and zeros.

If you have a ton of drives I think shredos can be automated with boot parameters. Could save a lot of time and/or let you scale wiping better

2

You reached the end

Nwipe vs HDD physical destruction | Spyke