Spyke

It’s not that hard.

Fuck the RIAA: The artists should hold the rights to their music, not the publishers.

Fuck AI: The rights-holders (which ought to be the artists) should be able to distribute their work without fear that a bot will be allowed to use it to compete against them.

I just don’t see a healthy creative culture where you don’t push both buttons.

50
oo1reply
lemmings.world

hmmn, churn out a billion random chord progressions and copyright them all you say ?

6

cool, that actually looks like a good idea. Interesting for sync uses too , say, in film as i think so long as you re-performed the melody (not the "song") you'd be royalty free. I do think it'd be funny to hear the Joni Mitchell paved paradise melody in a car commercial - but that's still creative freedom. Interesting stuff.

2
lemmy.world

Let them fight, then move in to take out the winner.

21
Toes♀reply
ani.social

The real winners are the legal teams that reap those billions of dollars in fees.

16

my hatred for copyright holders have no bounds. this is an easy choice.

13
MikeOToxinreply
lemmy.world

No, the joke is having to choose 1 option that you think is better.

There is no need for there to be a choice if we just acknowledge that sometimes our decisions mean nothing to the final outcome.

5

And you're a real pleasant fella.

Have a great day, dude. Hope whatever's going on in your life gets better.

6

All melodies are free and open source. At best we can say an entire composition is copyrighted. If I take a composition I like and then make a new composition from it, it's ok, but if a computer does it it's not? That cannot be. It's unfortunate, but that's the direction things will go.

8

You reached the end