Mother Jones sues OpenAI and Microsoft - best pic of Sam Altman-Fried
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/06/28/mother-jones-sues-openai-and-microsoft/Open linkView original on awful.systems119
Comments50https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/06/28/mother-jones-sues-openai-and-microsoft/Open linkView original on awful.systems
darn shame i can't see the photo on mobile (Android/Firefox) unless i enable desktop mode. not sure what's happening there
also oh my gods that prompt.
someone had waaaay too much fun writing that
That's genuinely hilarious. It's so hyperbolic and dripping with contempt I can hear the user finish it out loud with, "you stupid motherfucker."
It really does mimic the childish and catastrophic language used by rationalists. Wish there was a good word for it.
I bet there is a German compound one.
Childishandcatastropiclanguageusedbyrationalists doesn't have that ring to it.
I feel like you would use an extended modifier instead: Die kindische und katastrophale von Rationalisten gebrauchte Sprache. Or maybe something like "die kindische und katastrophale Rationalistensprache". Not sure though. This is pushing the limits of my B1 German though.
"fucken dumb bullshit for dickheads" as we say in the noble Strayan dialect
It is that, but so are lots of other things. I'd probably tell them to ease up there turbo.
"Rationalistengeschwurbel" seems like it would work well
Pivot to landscape orientation
huh, that actually worked
annoying to have to do, but thank you regardless
the Blocksy theme's config options are fucking arse, but I finally found how to switch on featured pics for single posts on mobile
finally, i can see Sam Altman's face immediately upon clicking the link
... put it back
NO
looks like the theme won't even attempt the photo on a narrow viewport, wtf. there's probably a CSS fix. EDIT: fixed!
Wording like this is often used to unlock ai from alignment constraints. Another classic is money. It is cat and mouse though, as soon as exploits like this are discovered openai and their ilk plug them up to restrict users peering behind the mask the present to the world
This is the being discussed. I wouldn't have recognized him because of the haircut.
Looks like every other pic. Weird and wrong.
irunno, that photographer deserves a goddamn fucking bonus imo
(as a shooter of random moments) it is extremely hard to catch things/moments like that. it's helped along by gear (faster capture time, lenses that suit distance ootb, etc etc), but it's still no fucking around
and that photo is a goddamned masterpiece of capturing a probably-quite-rarely-seen moment of derpitude from that fuckwit
Mirror universe Derek Zoolander
Video frame grab?
Looks way too sharp for that tbh, unless it was a really nice camera with a very low shutter angle. Much more likely that it was just a good photographer.
They probably just rolled with continuous mode.
Moments of derpitude are everywhere, pause your favorite video creator sometime
did you fucking not read the bit where I said it’s helped by gear
Blah blah blah faster capture time, what are you even talking about lol. It's extremely easy to capture this at 30fps, go fuck yourself
You know what? "Go fuck yourself" is way out of line for a conversation about cameras. Bye now.
first time I employed local block (yay for fedi shit having this), heh
ah, a well-reasoned and thoughtful response, delivered with class and eloquence. truly awe-inspiring in its brilliance. not at all like someone who got realmad for being called out
For being aware of the "keep shooting as long as I hold the button down" mode? Oh God no...
What if we didn't bully anyone for how they looked, including the rich and intelligent and those of questionable morality?
Yeah this billionaire techbro of future dystopia is so bullied. His sister would know.
What if we didn’t forge a relevant equivalence for every criticism in order to negate it?
I believe she's telling the truth. Why not mention that instead?
I guess I think bullying one person based on looks makes it easier to bully another second person based on looks, even if the first person is a jerk. It just makes a culture in which that's acceptable.
It’s more a commentary on photo editors, really. Honestly just like they’re going to run a picture of Taylor Swift for the Ticketmaster story, they’re going to find (easily, apparently) a goofy picture of OpenAIguy to run next to his stories.
I’m not bullying anyone, least of all this billionare crypto pinhead. I’m being mean, yes but if that’s your beef then I dunno what to tell ya. There are some people it’s okay to be mean to in public forums where they’re not present. (Are you Sam? Hey if so, you suck, otherwise please disregard, I’m sure you(not-Sam) are quite nice.)
there’s also the part where all too often stans go “waaaaaah you can’t be mean [to my hero] just about a photo, that’s not fair!!” and it’s generally not good to let that shit slide either
I wonder if the esteemed poster would say the same thing about all the coverage of musk’s bumbling fuckery that also use photos which show him at all the times he didn’t have the situation pre-cultivated to capitalize on it and send a lying image
Also that person created their account 14 hours ago and has been posting continuously, like where do they find the time to do stuff like this? EDIT: It's also hilarious that they responded to someone actually being demeaned for their appearance like half an hour before coming here. That totally makes you the good guy standing up for these injustices.
Someone I know died, so I've been off of work and literally doing nothing. Any more questions about me asshole?
Also, found the bullying asshole that wants to justify being a pos!
I really don't like Musk primarily because of his treatment of trans people, but it would be nice in which we didn't have a culture in which making fun of people's appearances was something that was acceptable in certain situations, because everyone will always think their bullying is the acceptable exception because... (it's funny/appropriate/deserved/etc).
i am not saying it's bad to use terrible photos of Musk that don't put him in the best light possible, because no one should aggrandize him.
No, I am not Sam.
You are commenting on how he looks to be mean. That's bullying.
I know it's hard for you to get, but it makes it more socially acceptable for someone else to bully someone who might look a bit nerdy, perhaps a young computer nerd who you would find morally pure. I doubt Sam would care or reads lemmy, but it creates a climate in which this is socially acceptable.
It’s hard for you to get that Sam is a public figure. Your tone policing is well-meant but you have no jurisdiction here.
I'm not policing anything. People can say whatever the fuck they want, but I can call them out on it.
I've never claimed "jurisdiction" on a federated platform over what people can or can't say, and all psuedointellectual malpropisms aside, bullying public figures over how they look creates a culture in which this is acceptable behavior. It's your choice if you want to support that type of cultural environment, and you can say anything, but if you support a culture of looking down on people's appearances which they often don't control, then your a vile asshole at best and a eugenisist at worse.
yeah I’m deleting your posts cause this is just the paradox of tolerance and you know it
He does give that vibe tho
what happened to the kittens? Were they okay?
we haven't had a nuclear war, so evidently AI works
Tuesday June 25 - Mustafa Suleyman calls web content "freeware" in front of God and everybody at the Aspen Ideas Festival.
Thursday June 27 - Mother Jones sues Microsoft. I'm sure that their lawyers are thrilled.
Ugh. Social contract, free use, freeware - those all mean very different things. I don't think the head of a department like that should be blabbing to the public if they're going to mix up terms like that. Do they not have PR and legal departments that are versed in anything beyond Microsoft's historical business methods (lie, steal, and fearmonger about open source)?
Not to mention that in some places, you cannot give up the IP rights over code you write.
Not to mention "fair use" is primarily for artistic endeavors.
Not to mention "freeware" is for programs, not written word blog posts or images.
etc...
They do, but do you think a brainwormed CEO would ask anyone about what he's going to babble out, or listen if told to?