BBombastic replysopuli.xyz2Hide 2 repliesBut this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from "would" to "did"15
ÐÐ Greıt Þu̇mpkin replylemm.eeDoes that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?5
TTachyonTele replylemm.ee22Hide 22 repliesSame. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.8
FFushuan [he/him] replylemm.ee6Hide 6 repliesit's a reference to elden ring. That's Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.33
Iheartcheese replylemmy.world5Hide 5 repliesAnd the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.12
samus12345 replylemmy.world3Hide 3 repliesI'd say it's more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn't well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.17
TTachyonTele replylemm.ee2Hide 2 replies the original isn't well known This comic got called out immediately by multiple people0
samus12345 replylemmy.world1Hide 1 replyBut it was called a "rip-off" when it was clearly parodying the original.6
ZZorque replylemmy.worldThat doesn't mean the original isn't well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.1
ThatWeirdGuy1001 replylemmy.world14Hide 14 repliesIdk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea. In a world with 8 billion people it's hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.8
Iheartcheese replylemmy.world12Hide 12 replies It's word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don't know what you're talking about.46
samus12345 replylemmy.world3Hide 3 repliesIs this the original? Having the "monster" be an angel and labeling the person "monster fucker" makes it actually make sense to me.11
I Cast Fist replyprogramming.dev2Hide 2 repliesIn the OP's comic, it certainly takes longer to figure "would what?" The original above with the angel has "monster fucker" on the person, so it's a bit easier to deduce, "would fuck"14
I Cast Fist replyprogramming.devThe dragon (and the angel) doesn't want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it's "you're supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won't want to have sex with me"1
Iheartcheese replylemmy.worldKind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck2
cceenote replylemmy.worldHe's setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?3
TTachyonTele replylemm.eeThat's not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.8
__NoName_ lemmy.ml1Hide 1 replySo in this case, is the "Would." Implying "I would fuck that."? Is this another format of "Hear me out..."?21
(⬤ᴥ⬤) replylemmy.blahaj.zone1Hide 1 replyI would (slang, idiomatic) Used to denote that the speaker finds another person sexually attractive.30
Ive seen this exact joke with another monster
Congrats, you've just discovered internet memes.
But this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from "would" to "did"
Does that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?
Same. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.
it's a reference to elden ring. That's Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.
And the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.
I'd say it's more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn't well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.
This comic got called out immediately by multiple people
But it was called a "rip-off" when it was clearly parodying the original.
That doesn't mean the original isn't well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.
No you haven't...
Idk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea.
In a world with 8 billion people it's hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.
It's word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don't know what you're talking about.
Is this the original? Having the "monster" be an angel and labeling the person "monster fucker" makes it actually make sense to me.
Yep. This comic even has its own know your meme page
Harsh to call this a "rip-off", then.
... because it's obviously ripping it off?
I still don't get the ,,would".
In the OP's comic, it certainly takes longer to figure "would what?"
The original above with the angel has "monster fucker" on the person, so it's a bit easier to deduce, "would fuck"
Oh. Yeah. But why afraid?
The dragon (and the angel) doesn't want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it's "you're supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won't want to have sex with me"
Would have sex
Kind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck
He's setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?
That's not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.
Meta
Meta is self-reference, not just any reference
So in this case, is the "Would." Implying "I would fuck that."? Is this another format of "Hear me out..."?
Yes
I don't get it.
I would
(slang, idiomatic) Used to denote that the speaker finds another person sexually attractive.
Thanks.
the Biblical Angel/I Forgot Who It Was one was better