Spyke
lemmy.world

Duh. As these models get better they’ll become more widely used by enterprises to save costs. That’s why these tech companies spent so much developing them… to sell them. The solution isn’t banning AI btw, it’s providing UBI to those most affected

65
fedia.io

If you're providing it to only some people, it's not very universal now is it

29
lemmy.world

Providing income universally to those most affected. It’ll never happen anyways though let’s be real. Look at our current politics.

3

Making everyone using them on a subscription model then when AI replace nearly everyone so company are stuck with AI jack the price as high as possible for ever and ever and ever

5

The winners of a system don't have an incentive to undermine the rules. Quite the opposite. The NYT wants these rules because it would benefit from them. There are at least 2 image generators that adhere to capitalist ethics. I don't know what Claro uses, but I see no indication that they are being uppity.

9

They are just practicing using AI to help out with the workload

5

You reached the end

Leaked Memo Claims New York Times Fired Artists to Replace Them With AI | Spyke