Spyke
Hucklebeereply
lemmy.world

Yeah, thought this too. Identified a similair looking spider with an app once.

Big nope vibes.

8
shalafireply
lemmy.world

The bite like wolfies? Because I had one hit me like when bee sting when I scared her up.

5
lemmus.org

Yeah, probably. A bee sting is a pretty good comparison for spider bites in general, though with a very low chance of alergic reaction compared to bees or wasps. And that's really where the danger is.

Otherwise it will just hurt for a bit and then go away.

9

Bees hurt way worse than these IMO. But I'm possibly mildly allergic to bees.

1

Thanks, that was my assumption as well from some minor googling but wanted to get another pair (or 3) of eyes on it

7
lemmus.org

I just got a reply back from a buddy that is an actual publish arachnologist and he confirms it's Zoropsidae (the false wolf spiders, and the family including the widley suggested Titiotus).

24

Thanks, I also thought it was a wolf or false wolf as well from some minor googling. I appreciate you reaching out to your friend for the expert opinion!

8

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

hiding

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

2

Thanks for sharing this! I quite enjoyed it.

The choice to

::: spoiler show spoiler muffle the microphone when the spider covered its head with sand :::

was a brilliant touch.

P.S. I wish Lemmy supported >!inline spoilers!<. The current spoiler markdown is pretty clunky.

2

Ha! I thought it was on a paper towel or something until it actually moved the sand at the end.

1

Arthropods aren't my forte, and its hard to judge without a sense of scale and/or a look at the eye layout. So someone more knowledgeable should correct me. That said, it I looks to me like a Titiotus. Various species of which call California home.

8
lemmy.sdf.org

Thanks, I didn't realize how varied eye layouts were in spiders otherwise I would have tried for a better pic from another angle. Hoped the rough size estimate would be sufficent but I understand how a picture with a banana (or similar) for scale would be more helpful. Appreciate the response and it seems the crowd has spoken -- false wolf spider! (or perhaps regular wolf spider but either way is good enough for me)

5

or perhaps regular wolf spider

Nope, easily exluded by what you can see in the pictures, by the eyes. The entire cephalothorax region is wrong for a wolf spider. I was first stuck on Gnaphosidae.

And your picture was brilliant. You won't believe the shitty pictures some people expect you to give an ID from. And you gave a proper size (though we prefere body lenght over leg span and centimetres) and a location.

This post was perfect. Even got the "oh a brown spider, must be a brown recluse" comment ...

Join [email protected] maybe?

6

Your size description was good, I'm just terrible at imagining sizes well. But I get why getting it to stand next to a coin or something for scale was not an option. I love spiders, but they don't take direction.

5

Thank you! I thought probably wolf at first and only learned about the existence of false-wolf when googling.

2

Definitely not.

Don't ID medical significant spiders if you don't know what you're talking about.

18
lemmus.org

I understand it's very much a meme. But a bad one. And without any indicators that it's not a serious answer it should just be treated as a wrong answer.

When someone honestly requests and ID these kinds of jokes are also just not appropriate in general. Most people that find spiders aren't in on them.

9

I wasn't trying to come across as "pissy". But trying to explain the "joke" you referenced. And yes, I guess explaining a joke always kind of makes you sound like a dick.

Nothing personal. But spider IDs are serious business.

8

You reached the end

[Solved] What kind of spider is this? | Spyke