Spyke
infosec.pub

I think you're confusing "oligarchy" with "authoritarian"... one doesn't necessarily imply or require the other.

32

Oligarchy is a heirarchical power structure where a privileged minority holds power over large parts of society. It's a type of authoritarianism

11
lemmy.world

Lol what a based meme. $249 to lockheed but the $12 triggers the rant.

20
lemmy.world

Authoritarianism is when taxes pay for defense and civil space program?

Yeah I get it, out military is bloated, does bad things, and we keep the industrial complex going buy selling weapons to almost anyone who will buy them.

The government paying SpaceX to build rockets is not authoritarianism.

18

You could attribute any payment, no matter how corrupt, to “national defense and a civil space program.”

5
the_crotchreply
sh.itjust.works

The US is bordered by friendly nations on the north and south, oceans on the east and west, and has a stockpile of thousands of potentially world ending nukes. You could cut the pentagons budget down to the price of a big Mac and fries and nobody would be able to invade.

12
the_crotchreply
sh.itjust.works

Yes. Have you heard of fuel and supply chains? D-day nearly failed, and the allies had a staging ground right across the channel. Turns out amphibious assaults against an entrenched enemy are really hard.

6
the_crotchreply
sh.itjust.works

They're not. The US has as many privately owned guns as it does people. The idea behind arming the populace was (drumroll please) to repel foreign invasions.

Also, the military weapons we've stockpiled for decades, making up the largest armory in the world by a wide margin, aren't going to vanish into thin air if you cut the pentagons budget.

Finally, if the US faced an existential threat they'd unload on the aggressor with nukes.

Nobody's going to invade the mainland US. They'd be stupid to try and they'd end up getting wiped out.

0

The Ukraine war has demonstrated what a military asset Starlink is. You can control drones in real time with no direct line of sight.

4

*paying SpaceX way less for rocket launches than they would any of their competitors.

SpaceX, Musk or not, has tremendously reduced the cost to launch stuff to LEO. I'd rather give SpaceX $12 than ULA $24 for fewer launches.

2

Why are we focusing on musk when 150 went to a war profiteering company? And 90 to a company that kills it's whistleblowers? Rn musk seems like the least of our worries

18
lemmy.world

Wow, government contractors get paid by the government which translates to your tax dollars. That money bought things. How the money made from businesses gets distributed and what the government spends money on are totally different discussions. What a stupid fucking meme.

6
Match!!reply
pawb.social

i don't fucking want the government buying those things in the first place

3
lemmy.world

"... and what the government spends money on are totally different discussions"

-2
lemmy.world

It very obviously is considering no part of the meme specified any type of good or service and the one thing it decided to single out is SpaceX funding which is literally NASA. Is your hot take on this meme that we should defund NASA and you are opposed to the Artemis program? Or do you just not like Musk or are diverting to the defense spending which was clearly not the focus of the meme?

-2
Match!!reply
pawb.social

I don't care about the last half the meme, being that that's just an appeal to pathos against Musk. I care about the first $336 mentioned and that it's largely for military spending that I do not want.

1

You reached the end

Where your money really goes | Spyke