Spyke
lemm.ee

Web search is failing me for a primary source under the deluge of web/pop culture fascination with katanas, but I swear I’ve read that their primary killing tool in battle was the Yumi bow, usually fired from horseback.

Guns displaced every warrior-caste from multiple different societies; the samurai held on to power through arms control first for swords, then later guns once the colonial powers forced Japan to end its self imposed isolation.

63
snooggumsreply
midwest.social

Bows (or other projectiles) and spears ruled the battlefield in Japan and everywhere else on the planet when combat was primarily hand to hand. Sometimes there were situations where swords or maces and other close in weapons had the advantage, but in general killing someone from a distance with a weapon that could be primarily made of wood and relatively simple is just going to be the most commonky used tool of war.

Romans, known for the gladius short sword, would initially start combat with slings, javelins, and spears. They only switched to swords up close. Same for samurai.

51
lemmy.world

primarily made of wood and relatively simple

Also, less maintenance/ material required for its creation.

A spear point with a couple of langets is something a blacksmith can knock out by the hour. Good swords take longer and are more technical to make. You break your spear shaft in training? Well tough as, but you can find a suitable replacement and remount it on campaign.

23

The sword has always been the last option as a weapon. Like a handgun would be today. A spear would always be preferred.

17

Even more than that, while we think of the gladius as their iconic weapon, the only weapon that served for the entire history of the Roman military is the bronze spear, though it eventually became ceremonial.

Swords are flashy and the weapon of a noble in town, as they’re expensive, high skill, and a reasonable sidearm for relative safety. They weren’t replaced in function by the rifle, but by the pistol. This is actually quite similar to the mindset of revolvers in the American west. The primary armament of that period’s conflicts was the lever action rifle, but the revolver was better in town.

9

It's more that guns were hard to get until the British and Americans forced Japan to open its borders. They were generally imported through the Spanish/Portuguese, or the Dutch after they established trade relations. Even after they started making their own matchlocks, I believe they were only produced in small batches due to the high percentage of impurities in Japan's iron deposits.

17

You’re right, that last sentence was ham fisted - I was referring to the gunboat diplomacy opening the trade free for all after decades of isolation, not colonial annexation.

6
lemmy.world

It’s rather complicated. In the “in-between” times, firearms were considered a coward’s weapon, making the user a “sniper” and thus less honorable than those who used more traditional arms. This faded with time however, as most ideas do.

56
SkyezOpenreply
lemmy.world

This faded with time however

Yeah, because the people that thought that way got fucking shot.

118

Also because they became more accurate and more skill dependent. Early guns were just RNG. That's why muskets were most useful fired in barrages.

2

In latin languages it's even called "besta" to indicate it's from the beast (Satan)

2
lemm.ee

Bro American Sniper was a fucking badass film. No politics or anything. Just a guy shooting terrorists.

-2
lemm.ee

It has the same quality as that nazi propaganda sniper movie from inglorious basterds. Just different insignias

6

I just hate military propaganda with passion

Showing all these cringy hero scenes with lofty music black hawk down etc. We are the good guys, heroes and all that horseshit.

4

Explanation: It's just that... you have all these squishy parts, master. And all that water! How the constant sloshing doesn't drive you mad, I have no idea. HK-47

12
aussie.zone

Longbow was the main battle weapon of samurai. Even after firearms, which they got the peasants to stand in a line and fire volleys just like in the West.

33
reliv3reply
lemmy.world

Reading your links, the correction you made seems semantically insignificant. Yumi is the word for "bow" in Japanese and longbows describe bows that are long. Longbows are not unique to the English, and there are a lot of bows that can be described as longbows. So my point is, if samurais used yumis that are long (which some did) then saying they used longbows is not incorrect. Nevertheless, thank you for letting us know what the Japanese called their bows, it was educational.

17
Paddzrreply
lemmy.world

As someone who did archery at national level... Your comment is triggering my need to point out how difficult and different "longbows" are.

I couldn't handle it after years of playing. The term longbow in archery is as calling everything AR15.

11
Auxreply
lemmy.world

Well, a lot of rifles are called AK47 even though most of them are not.

3
ouRKaoSreply
lemmy.today

According to the media, every gun is either an AR-15 or a Glock.

6

Depends on the media I guess, because every gun is literally AK.

2
reliv3reply
lemmy.world

That's pretty cool that you did archery at a national level.

Respectfully, I still think that I am correctly interpretting the information on the Wikipedia links sourced above. I'm basing my conclusion off two pieces of evidence. The longbow wiki page linked above mentions that longbows existed in "many cultures", and there is a separate Wikipedia page for the English Longbow. This pushes me to conclude that there is a symantical difference between the two terms, "longbow" and "English Longbow" though many people assume the latter when the former is mentioned.

1

Very interesting indeed. Thanks for sharing. I'm just pointing out that people are assuming "English Longbow" when saying "longbow". Which, to be fair to these folks, the English Longbow is likely the most famous longbow in history. Nevertheless, even the Wikipedia page sourced above mentions that longbows existed in "many cultures" and there is a separate Wikipedia page for the English Longbow. This pushes me to conclude that there is a symantical difference between the two terms, "longbow" and "English Longbow" though many people assume the latter when the former is mentioned.

3
Kusimulkkureply
lemm.ee

Yumi (弓) is the Japanese term for a bow.

-1
ludreply
lemm.ee

used in English, yumi refers more specifically to traditional Japanese asymmetrical bows, and includes the longer daikyū (大弓) and the shorter hankyū (半弓) used in the practice of kyūdō and kyūjutsu, or Japanese archery.

4
Kusimulkkureply
lemm.ee

Used in English it's some weebshit, don't try to deny it

-3
ludreply
lemm.ee

No, every language does similar things about loads of similar shit.

You are just annoyed that you didn't think of reading beyond the first sentence, lol.

3

I've actually read the whole article before. I was a weeb once...

0
lemmy.world

Yeah they were soldiers. Alexander the Great had engineers in his army for a reason. Genghis Kahn would lose his shit over a magnum gun.

20
lemmy.world

Depending on the era, they were rich thugs who could and would slice a homeless person in half for looking at them wrong.

6
lemmy.world

Genghis Kahn would love the Toyota hilux. The modern technical is endowed with his spirit of “let’s make the real shit of war more mobile”

14

The ancient call to hop into your Hilux and go raiding and pillaging some villages

2