Spyke
lemm.ee

That number doesn't mean KIA. That encompasses all casualties. So if you got arms and legs blown off and can no longer fight, you are lumped into that number. The KIA number is around 130-140k. Which is still a lot of people.

89
lemmy.world

In context of the war, this number is more relevant. Dead or too injured to fight, fewer troops are fewer troops. It doesn't really matter what percentage in that 466,150 number are still alive when it comes to Russia's chances against the Ukrainian military.

35

Not disputing that. Just that OP labeled them all as killed. Any Russian sent home in a box or carried out on a litter is a win for democracy.

26
NoiseColorreply
startrek.website

Russia has more to spend. Ukraine doesn't which is becoming more and more apparent. Luckily that US bill was approved. But still there will need to be some immense luck and enginuity for Ukraine not to fall. Not to mention for Europe to stop this common delusion, come together and form a modern and strong army to step behind Ukraine with long term support. Probably with soldiers as well.

15
Deestanreply
lemmy.world

If you can expend more artillery, you can use less soldiers.

5

No, that'd be weird. You use artillery and soldiers.

The less soldiers you lose, the more you have left.

6

When you have better tech, you need fewer soldiers. It's the same with artillery as it is with drones.

1
Chee_Koalareply
lemmy.world

I do kind of feel good when i see aggressor troops fall/perish . At least that soldier can't kill anymore defenders, so it's like a +X ukrainian lives lootdrop that pop's out of them. I'm not happy a human is now dead, but I am happy that there is one soldier less in poot poot's army killing other people in their home country.

5
copdreply
lemmy.world

Cough Vietnam, cough Falklands, sniffle gulf war.

Do you feel the same when it's the "good guys" doing it?

-2

If you loose an arm or a leg as a russian fighter, you are not gonna survive. Doubtful you will even be looked at twice. A wounded russian is a MIA russian. Russia is a cold place. Not just literally.

0

Russia apparently has a deep history of spending enormous numbers of lives for military victories. Unless something changed I wouldn't rely on casualty numbers to indicate if they are close to breaking.

8

It's worth remembering that WW2 was an existential threat to the Soviet Union and most of the people living in it. This war isn't. See how the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan turned out.

And, of course, Ukraine was also part of the Soviet Union. Russians weren't the only ones fighting the Nazis on the Eastern Front

20
wewbullreply
feddit.uk

It's there in their leaders, sure.

I don't believe the people see it the same way.

2
Jakdraculareply
lemmy.world

I’m not hearing a lot about the Russian people being against the war.

5
kbin.social

I have. Did you not see there was an open armed rebellion in Russia? Granted it was the Wagner group but still, the people of Russia certainly didn't stop them or unite against the rebellion.

5

Of course not. They're living in fear of their lives if they critisise the government.

2

You reached the end