Spyke
pawb.social

3 because I'm not a giant who needs a massive fucking fork. Give me the smallest one you got.

11
1rrereply
discuss.tchncs.de

Enjoy not eating your noodles at they fall off your fork I guess

3
pancakesreply
sh.itjust.works

It's more like: would you rather use a precision laser or a shotgun to eat with?

2

Neither, I'd rather use a fork long enough that noodles don't slip off it regardless of which way you hold it.

2

I am fond of #4 quite a bit. It's sleek, unconventional and aesthetically pleasing. :3

Second choice is probably #2.

10
BlueKittyreply
kbin.social

4 for me too! I wish there were some smaller ones or that this one was tiny, it would be almost perfect. Smol cutlery gang represent?

4
lemm.ee

4th is nice. Because the steel quality seems good and it's a bit fancy looking.

7

I like the shape and simplicity of 3, but the heft and polish of 5.

6 is irritating. It doesn't know what it wants to be.

6

Those are my thoughts exactly. As someone else pointed out, the tines on 5 are fucking immaculate as well. I want those tines!

3

3 looks blunt af those big ass prongs aren't piercing anything. I am a ride or die for 5

5

5… 3 looks like one from high school that would be half bent

5

Probably number 5 though if 5 is not available I will choose number 3. Also anyone else count the tines to see if any of them were actually tridents?

4

I don't know about you but I prefer my forks without handles. Straight up just the pointy parts.

3

The type with scrollwork on them, or something I can feel on the handle

3

1 or 5, they're both pretty sleek and have some texture around the edges. idrc about size

3

So what's the answer? Pick 4 and you're a psychopath, 5 and you're a narcissist?

1

You reached the end