Amanda Knox faces a new slander trial in Italy that could remove the last legal stain against her
Amanda Knox faces another trial for slander this week in Italy in a case that could remove the last legal stain against her, nine years after Italy’s highest court threw out her conviction for the murder of her 21-year-old British roommate.
Knox, who was a 20-year-old student when she was accused along with her then-boyfriend of murdering Meredith Kercher in 2007, has built a life back in the United States as an advocate, writer, podcaster and producer — with much of her work drawing on her experience.
…
Despite a definitive ruling by Italy’s Cassation Court in 2015 that Knox and then-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito did not commit the crime, and the conviction of another man whose DNA was at the scene, doubts persist about Knox’s role with the victim’s family and the man she wrongly accused.
https://apnews.com/article/italy-knox-kercher-slander-trial-8da026157bd9c9391ebf23061195e6d2Open linkView original on lemmy.world
26 replies
Just to pre-empt the usual misunderstanding when these badly reported stories get posted: this is the equivalent of an appeal, initiated by Knox. Not the Italian courts persecuting her.
What is the online mob's ruling on her again?
Regardless of the online mob, she was done dirty by the Italian police system. A small town cop singled her out without a shred of evidence while the Rudy Guede who was later convicted for the murder and who's DNA was all over the place was on the run in Germany. Just tragic situation all around because she spent 2 years in jail awaiting trial. I live in Italy, and I can tell you the Italian justice system is a farce.
EDIT: Correction was made to this post. Rudy did not confess to the actual murder as far as I can find. He did confess to being in the apartment however. Thanks to @[email protected] for the correction.
Thank you, online mob
Rudy Guede did not confess. He admits he was there, on an impromptu date with Meredith Kurcher, heard a commotion while he was taking a dump, disturbed the killers, who ran for it.
He pled guilty for a shorter sentence.He chose a fast-tracked trial and was originally sentenced to 30 years, reduced on appeal to 16. Knox and Sollecito were also convictedand got longer sentences than Guede because they went to trial. They werebut were later freed on appeal.I've no idea what the truth is but your summary is inaccurate.
Edited for accuracy/poor memory.
Thanks for pointing that out. I corrected my comment. It's been a while since the trial. In any case, the forensic team and the detectives on the case botched tho whole investigation. There is video footage of them walking carelessly throughout the whole apartment. Then these inexperienced out of touch detectives forced a confession out of Amanda Knox in Italian (which she barely spoke) without even a translator present. My country is a joke.
It's a confused tangle of evidence, for sure. But there are approximately two Black men in Perugia and she falsely accused the one who wasn't there. It sticks in my craw, even if the most obvious explanation is that she is an American white woman and falsely accusing Black men is part of her heritage.
I don't want to dig up the case, but wasn't his DNA found all over the place?
Come on....is this what we're doing now... Are we emo teens now? JFC
If his story is true, his DNA would be found all over the place. His story being: they were making out, he didn't flush the toilet, he fought off the attackers, and he tried to help Meredith before getting scared and running away.
I'm offering the kindest explanation for Knox falsely accusing a Black man. The other is that she saw a Black man at the scene.
Did Knox actually accuse him of the murder? What exactly did she say? You're very hung up on the race thing for some reason. What exactly was Amanda's statement?
Is it really?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-race_effect
Your point only makes sense if you believe that Rudy Guede was telling the truth. It's possible but she was acquitted so you probably shouldn't libel her here.
Indeed, who is DNA really?
As a recently-accused leader of the online mob, I find it hard to care and I wonder why this specific woman's case keeps getting brought back up.
who?