Spyke
privacy·PrivacybyWild Bill

What phone brand do you like the best?

*In terms of privacy, customisation, camera quality, and battery time.

For the longest time I have only used either iPhone or Samsung. I plan on switching to Android for the next phone I get, but I find that Samsung phones are often too big for me and put too much energy on camera quality (I don’t take many photos). I have started to look into brands such as Nokia and Motorola, and I would like to know what you guys think of them. Additionally, do you suggest any other phone brands aside from them? My biggest priorities are privacy and long battery time. Bonus if the phone can run LineageOS (I have excluded Graphene as they are only compatible with Pixel phones).

Thank you for any answers. Cheers!

View original on midwest.social
lemmy.ml

I don't get people claiming stock iPhone is private. We literally have very little idea. It's a closed system. It's private if you take Apple's word but all the other manufacturers also have similar claims. Why trust Apple and not them?

On top of that you end up locked into their ecosystem, unable to use most FOSS applications or have cut down versions of them because daddy Apple didn't like some features.

64
Rosereply
lemmy.world

A friend told me there's no point in stealing them as it's impossible to unlock or wipe them, which would give them the edge at least in that respect. Is this accurate?

9
headroomreply
lemmy.ml

Yes iPhones are secure but not private. The two are related but different concepts. I'm not sure what exactly your friend is referring to though.

29

He’s referring to how, if you are signed into an Apple ID and have a passcode, there really is no way to use the phone if you steal it (to my knowledge). The device is a complete brick if you don’t have the Apple ID credentials.

2
lemmy.world

This is accurate, it is also accurate for (at least some part of) android though... Going into recovery boot requires the phone pin for my mid-range phone. Hell even turning off the phone can be set to require pin or biometric.

4

The turning off part is completely stupid though, nearly every phone has a button combo to hard power off (usually power + either vol up or vol down).

3
lemmy.world

The irony of using Android is that if you want privacy and security you'll have to buy a Pixel phone. Everything else is either less secure or harder to install alternative systems.

56
feddit.nl

I don't recall it was hard to install IodéOS on a Fairphone 4.

15
TCB13reply
lemmy.world

It isn't, but it isn't also secure. Your bootloader is easily compromised and people can get to your data in no time.

11
feddit.nl

True, since Fairphone's focus seems to be on fairness in the hardware. I wish they were better on the software side as well.

13
Rogue1633reply
discuss.tchncs.de

I think if Fairphones get GrapheneOS support, it would be a no brainer for many. A phone you can repair yourself, which is fairly produced, with the safety and the absence of Google from GrapheneOS would be a good combo

5

I think if Fairphones get GrapheneOS support...

Then Fairphone needs to up their hardware security and software support. GrapheneOS has minimum requirements that vendors must meet for GrapheneOS to support them, and Fairphone doesn't measure up. Only Pixels do, at the moment.

8
Wild Billreply
midwest.social

In that case, would you not recommend Motorola? I’m not very well versed on their terms of privacy, and I really like the way they look and how seemingly good the battery is, but if it’s considered unsafe or full of malware then I might need to look other ways.

5
sopuli.xyz

The problem is that GrapheneOS really, truly, actually is the only way to get even reasonable levels of privacy on a mobile device right now.

That sounds so much like a shill statement, and it seems that way from others too I'm sure. But its true. If you understand anything at all that happens under the hood of an operating system and android in general, GrapheneOS is the ONLY option for actual privacy and security. And the unfortunate part, is that only Pixels are supported by this.

20
Wild Billreply
midwest.social

I will read more into this, but it sounds reasonable. If I were to get a Pixel, is there any particular model I should get or does it not matter? Does Graphene support all models?

5
TCB13reply
lemmy.world

Read this: https://grapheneos.org/faq#device-support

Unlike others, Graphene has very strict requirements when it comes to devices to ensure you're safe.

As usual if you’re looking to have any security (Verified boot) GrapheneOS + Pixel phone is the only options. I really don’t get it how come people in places like this are okay with having a phone with all their personal data and logins without verified boot. Stolen / lost phone and game over.

Calyx, for instance, isn't as good as GrapheneOS, they do a lot of snitching on you (including to Google and Mozilla) and they overlook critical details such as this one allowing the OS to contact 3rd parties such as Qualcomm.

Other phone brands, let's say Fairphone just don't make thing right. Fairphone guys have been petitioned multiples times to open their platform and/or collaborate with projects such as GrapheneOS and CalyxOS so user can have private and secure phones but they don't care.

CalyxOS does support the Fairphone 4 however that's only due to the persistence and reverse engineering efforts of the CalyxOS project / community. If you decide to use it you won't have a secure bootloader anymore due to a bug in Fairphone's firmware that they choose not to fix. That's how "fair" the "Fairphone" really is.

Here is more relevant information for you from here:

XTRA is technology offered by Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. in the US and QT Technologies Ireland Limited in the European Economic Area to improve mobile device performance. XTRA downloads a data file from Qualcomm containing the predicted orbits of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) satellites. Using the XTRA data file reduces the time the device needs to calculate its location, thus saving time and battery power when using location-based applications. Newer versions of the XTRA software also upload a small amount of data to us. We use the uploaded data for purposes described in this Policy, such as maintaining and improving the quality, security, and integrity of the service. XTRA uploads the following data types: a randomly generated unique ID, the chipset name and serial number, XTRA software version, the mobile country code and network code (allowing identification of country and wireless operator), the type of operating system and version, device make and model, the time since the last boot of the application processor and modem, and a list of our software on the device

Before you say this is the CPU's fault, it isn't, at least on its own. GrapheneOS also deals with this kind of stuff and has patches and options so you can block it.

14
Mazokureply
lemmy.ml

Calyx does a lot of snitching on you

That is certainly over dramatic for what is in that article. All they do with Google is trivial things like updating your systems internal clock. A large portion of what is in that article is able to be disabled and prevented by not using Micro-G.

There seems to be massive beef and drama between Calyx and Graphene communities, I have no idea what any of that is about, but this dramatization doesn’t help.

6

That is certainly over dramatic for what is in that article. All they do with Google is trivial things like updating your systems internal clock

No it's not... https://calyxos.org/docs/guide/security/network-activity/ and even if it "only" updating your clock, don't you think that google adds that info to their database? I'm sure they'll at least log your IP and try to cross with your other google queries to know who you are. Mind that with the IP you get an approximate location. It also contacts SUPL for GPS and Remote Key Provisioning that opens the door for you to become hostage of Google in certain situations.

There seems to be massive beef and drama between Calyx and Graphene communities, I have no idea what any of that is about, but this dramatization doesn’t help.

This is not dramatization, Calyx is good in some aspect, way better than everything else stock and whatnot, but they overlook important details as described before.

4
BlackRingreply
midwest.social

GrapheneOS supports recent Pixels. I think right now they are supporting the 5a and later, with legacy and extended support back to the 4.

6

In general, they stop providing updates when Google does. Check both to be sure, but newer is better if you want longer support.

I'm going Google will launch a Pixel 8a in a couple months so I can either get it or the 8 at a discount.

2

Grapehene has historically offered extended support, but for the longest support time the pixel 8 isnt a bad option. The 7a is also I think the king of budget phones right now but the 8 is on sale for a few hundred off the last I checked :)

1

And the unfortunate part, is that only Pixels are supported by this.

Because unlike the Fairphone guys google actually plays fairly and builds a decent phone with security in mind.

2

I can't speak for privacy interworkings but Motorola makes it very easy to unlock the bootloader. I'm a fan of Xiaomi as well but my current Motorola is doing everything I need it to do and wasn't expensive at all.

3
TCB13reply
lemmy.world

This isn't about malware, it's about how much you value your data and how likely it is for a mobile phone to be lost / stolen. GrapheneOS + Pixel phone is the only true option if you want any kind of ensure that even of the device is lost your data won't be accessed.

Details here: https://lemmy.world/comment/8732695

2
Corngoodreply
lemmy.ml

GrapheneOS + Pixel phone is the only true option if you want any kind of ensure that even of the device is lost your data won't be accessed.

I think that's an exaggeration. You don't need secure boot for your data to be encrypted. What secure boot prevents is someone modifying the device without your knowledge (e.g. to capture your keys).

3

Yes, and if they capture your keys what happens? They get to your data.

1
Rosereply
lemmy.world

Why is this a problem? Buy one used if buying from Google is a problem. Then flash.

2

Yes, there's no problem. I was just stating that the irony is that if you want privacy and security you'll have to pick a google made device because the others will fail one way or another in some important detail.

2

This irony shows the superiority of Google.

They monopolize without having intention of monopoly.

It's admirable

-6
lemmy.world

In regards to stock systems, I agree.

Been stuck in the convenient ecosystem for a while, and I cope by telling myself Apple makes the bulk of its money with hardware and services. Not ads like Google. But if I would start over from zero, I think Graphene OS and Linux would be the way. But migrating the whole family away from our current Apple line up - I dread that challenge.

15
Pussistareply
sh.itjust.works

The thing about the Apple experience is that it doesn’t only integrate well among your own devices, but also others. Being isolated from that can be pretty challenging, especially if you are the only one in the family. Unless you come up with a whole marketing concept to make the change seem attractive to other (not techy) family members, you’d be cycling uphill.

1
sh.itjust.works

Can you be more specific?

I've heard this argument, but AFAIK the main things are iMessage and FaceTime. I don't know about your family, but I generally don't want FaceTime most of the time. I haven't used iMessage, but it seems like Signal is a drop in replacement, and the benefits are compatibility with Android and desktop apps for Windows and Linux.

Perhaps the play is to switch one app at a time. That's what I'm going to try to get ready to leave Android for Linux phones (assuming they'll be daily-driveable at some point).

1
Pussistareply
sh.itjust.works

iMessage and FaceTime are really not that relevant outside the US and, as you said, can be relatively easily replaced by Signal. As another commenter pointed out, it’s more about little things like Airdrop or iCloud’s all around seamlessness that cannot be matched by anything else I’ve tried. Family sharing alone would be a major loss if I were to switch. What Google or Microsoft have to offer in that regard is laughable in comparison (not that they’re any more “private”), and AFAIK, there is no FOSS alternative all of the iCloud family sharing functionality.

3

Makes sense, thanks for elaborating.

I'll have to look into the FOSS tools to see what could be a reasonable set of alternatives. Some initial thoughts:

  • KDE Connect - connects phone to Linux computer in an interesting way - easy to send files, see SMS, and a couple other things; it's a bit chunky, but maybe something I could help with
  • restic - automatic backup for desktop; pair with Syncthing to automatically keep stuff on your phone synced with your desktop
  • Steam now has better family sharing, and you could set something like Plex up to handle video streaming for owned content

But each of these are a bit inconvenient compared to what Apple offers. I'll think about it some more, and maybe I'll try building something. My kids will be getting old enough to have phones in a couple years, and I'd really rather avoid Apple's ecosystem, but their friends will likely all have iPhones so I'll want a reason for them to prefer something else.

1

I already use KDE Connect to exchange files with my Linux laptop and it’s not the best, but it’s good enough for the occasional thing.

Steam is not a solution IMO because it locks you in just as much as Apple while being clunky and giving you the illusion of choice. And it’s only for games. Family sharing on Apple products is more than games. If you’ve bought apps or subscriptions, you can share them with family members at no additional cost (if the app opts into that which is disclosed to you very clearly in the App Store). Screen Time is great to block apps above a certain age rating and to restrict or outright block purchases for children. Another thing is location sharing in the Find My app. I know there are many solutions for that, but I just like the UX in the Find My app a lot more.

About the Plex server, I’ve heard they’ve changed their TOS and are now pretty shady or something. Also, if I were to make a server like that, I’d be pirating stuff anyway which I already do through my go-to pseudo-streaming piracy sites.

I could see myself hosting a Synology NAS in the future, but that is still not as convenient or well thought out as the iCloud services tbh.

1

I guess there's not a super convenient alternative, but maybe something like Syncthing would be close enough?

But yeah, any kind of data synchronization or resource sharing is a little awkward.

1
lemmy.zip

The downside of Google Pixels is that they don't have jack connector and sd slot.

But I accepted the deal just to use GrapheneOS (I bought one used on ebay). Sometimes the battery lasts 3 days without being recharged.

People at GrapheneOS should really focus on some brand that cares about users on the hardware side.

25

Yup, I honestly don't care about the special features on the Pixel (esp camera), I literally only want it because of GrapheneOS and longer term software support.

I would love it if the GrapheneOS project made their own phone and supported it for a really long time. Maybe coordinate with Fairphone or something, IDK.

9

Unfortunately, buying from outside US, although possible, is a pain in the neck. You need agreement with the seller AND use a freight forwarder.

Swappa is a US-based marketplace. Sellers located outside the United States cannot create listings on Swappa. International buyers can buy on Swappa if they provide a US shipping address and use a US-based payment source.

3
midwest.social

Which pixel is getting you that battery life? My 6 has been struggling to make it through a day on GrapheneOS recently.

3
MrSoupreply
lemmy.zip

6a. Though I don't use the phone that much, most of the battery is drained by Telegram FOSS.

::: spoiler Here are two old screenshots :::

3
MrSoupreply
lemmy.zip

No, I'm Google free for at least 5 years now. I only have Aurora Store for the PS App.
I really only use FOSS apps.

If you need advices to breaking free, feel free to ask.

1

Ooh that might be why your battery is so good. The Google services do eat up a lot of charge it seems.

On the google free, I'm not perfect but I'm def conscious, and already am using mostly foss apps. The rest is just social media I can't really avoid. Thanks for the proposition though!

2
infosec.pub

OnePlus.

I'd never buy Samsung again, they are full of bloat and make it excessively hard to unlock the bootloader and get root access or install an alternative OS.

24

Oh that's good to know, thanks! I've read that from the OnePlus 12 onwards there won't be a localized OxygenOS anymore, only ColorOS, which is full of China-bloat. I'm still happy with the 10 Pro, but when the time comes and this holds true, I'll be looking for alternatives.

1

Samsung support is also a straight up scam. They'll lie to your face about how they're getting ready to send you a replacement, and then ghost you. I hope the feds sue them too but I'm not holding my breath. We filed a complaint with our state's AG and fuck all came of it.

2
lemm.ee

For me it has to be Fairphone. They are more expensive than the others to buy new but they are more aligned with openness and free software. They receive updates for a long time, are well supported by CalyxOS, /e/os, Linux mobile OSs etc, are repairable, you can carry extra batteries, usually have an SD card slot and two SIM slots and are more environmentally-friendly than others.

24

i second getting a fairphone, but look into a second battery or a power bank for heavy use.

4
lemmy.ml

Don't exclude Pixel phones so quickly. They are one of the most versatile for custom ROMs, and they check all of your checkboxes. I love my CalxyOS Pixel 6.

21
kbin.social

What phone brand do you like the best?

(I have excluded Graphene as they are only compatible with Pixel phones).

You're asking this on the privacy mag and intentionally/explicitly exclude the best privacy option with no explanation.

Wtf.

16
lemmy.zip

If privacy is important, a custom ROM is highly recommended or rather mandatory. Most brands have locked boot loader which can't be unlocked immediately without voiding warranty. Some let you to using some bs proprietary software but only after few months. That was the only reason I had to resort to getting a pixel. So look into all the brands available to you and check their policy on custom rooms before looking into the mobile themselves.

14
leanleftreply
lemmy.ml

adb debloating is adequate.
there may be additional steps for LOS privacy.

1

If you don't remove play service and shit without being unable to use payment apps and other shut, it's not gonna work for majority. Those are worst offenders that have to be removed for privacy.

2
MrSoupreply
lemmy.zip

You can't just recommend Pinephone.
It is at best an half baked device. Phone calls are not that good and I had to manually enable VoLTE and flashed a custom firmware on the modem.

8

I'd love a Pinephone, but that's not happening until it's usable as a phone, meaning:

  • MMS
  • decent call audio
  • reliable wake up from suspend
  • decent battery life

I don't even care about the camera working, fingerprint sensors, etc. I literally just want a phone that works reliably as a phone with super long term software support.

6

it ha physical killswitchs. thats pretty appealing if u need that.

1

Why exclude GrapheneOS? It's a really good mobile OS, and the creator has given his reasons for only supporting Pixels.

10
Zerushreply
lemmy.ml

Only with physical access, which nowaday nobody does.

0
melooonereply
feddit.de

Currently in the process of installing Lineageos on my brothers redmi note 10 pro.

Its a huge pain compared to my phone, mainly because unlocking the bootloader requires an account with his number connected. Then I had to install Windows to use their shitty unlock app, which the requires you to wait up to 30 days for seemingly no reason. Luckily "just" a week for us.

But yeah the hardware is amazing.

4

Its actually so good that the redmi note 8 (with lineageos-mucrog) I had before performed basically the same as my pixel 6a

2
lemmy.world

Until their cheap manufacturing quality makes them stop working because of a motherboard failure

-2

Oneplus with lineage os is pretty good but they sorta make it a pain to unlock the bootloader if the phone was not originally factory unlocked.

8
lemmy.world

i daily a Fairphone 4, has neither the best camera nor the best battery life. but it's the most repairable and durable phone i've owned.

i've had extremely good experieces with oneplus phones, dunno about custom ROM support though.

i've also heard good things about modern motorola phones, if the ROM support is there it's worth a shot imo.

8
Johnreply
discuss.tchncs.de

OnePlus 6 and 6T had really broad custom Rom support, it is till now one of the best Phones for linux(pmOS) With some Roms you can even relock the bootloader

3
lemmy.world

I am currently using my almlst 6 year old oneplus6 with lineage OS without any real issues

1

Might try it after getting lineage os on my redmi note12 in the next few days. The old battery just kinda does not last long anymore.

1
lemmy.ml

Not under your specs but the Sony Xperia line offers a headphone jack + microSD, can be unlocked, & has flagship specs (1 & 5). The 5 & 10 models are also smaller devices that actually fit in one hand too. This characteristic combo does not come in the other models folks are suggesting. Older models have LineageOS for microG support if you want an ungoogled phone (but beware the stock camera app is trash).

8
lemmy.zip

i loved my XZ2 Compact SO MUCH and then all the carriers in my country simultaneously dropped voice calling support for it. i'm still so salty

3

Because we need innovation, even if we got on just fine then

1
lemm.ee

I like fairphone the best out of all the ones that are currently available, however, my next phone will be a Pixel 8A because grapheneos doesn't support fairphone

7
LemmyHeadreply
lemmy.ml

Also no plans to support it. It meets their requirement of long support.

Me too fairphone for the repairability of it and long update support.

3
lemmy.world

Fairphone 4 user here, i love it. but ghost touch keeps coming back, i'm on my second screen now.

1

I just got a OnePlus 12 and this phone is fantastic. Bootloader is unlocked and you can do whatever you want. Battery is amazing. Charger is insane. Camera is more than decent. Price is very reasonable for what it offers.

6

I focus on the OS. However, I like the moto phones. I've had mine for 5 or 6 years and I don't have any reason to change.

5

My assus zenphone is quite good in a compact package and minimal changes to android.

No idea about customisation though.

5

Be warned that the latest models ASUS removed the ability to unlock the devices

3

As I usually unlock bootloader, I just buy cheap Chinese phones from around 100 bucks, right now I'm using a FreeYond M5 5G. Debloated and rooted. Working like a charm.

Edit: I prefer Motorola over Nokia.

5

graphene or calyxos is out

Graphene can run actual Google Play services sandboxed, so you might be in luck. I think CalyxOS has Google Play installed by default, so they may work as well, though it doesn't seem to be sandboxed. DivestOS may be an option as well.

Here's the page I'm pulling this from, I don't have any actual experience here (though planning to get a phone with an unlocked bootloader soon).

hoping in 5+ years time when my phone stops getting updates, that things will be a lot better in the linux mobile space

That's what I thought 4-ish years ago when I bought my current phone when I realized PinePhone wasn't going to be daily driveable, but things don't seem to have changed much (MMS seems to have gotten better, but still incomplete). Now I'm ready to replace it, and Linux phones still aren't daily driveable for me, but it's much better than before.

I'm still hopeful, but a little less excited than I was 4 years ago.

1

I've asked a similar question not long ago and the consensus was pixel, even though I had already ruled them out in my question.

I still haven't changed phones but I'm leaning on a nothing 2a, since it's reasonably priced for the storage that I want.

However, I've been looking at phones based on the specs I want and check XDA forums and see how active they are, in the hopes I get a phone popular enough that has long term community support

4

I've always liked the Stromberg Carlson Fiddleback myself.

1

Samsung Ultra all the way. It has top of the world hardware, software support

AND I can customize my phone the way I want.

2

I'm using a SHIFT6mq with LineageOS. It's similar to the Fairphone (expensive, but repairable, sustainable, good Custom ROM support), but it's got a few different design decisions and much higher build quality compared to the FP3 I had before.

2

Well Nokia is a no no They don't allow bootloader unlock, I would recommend that you check which privacy oriented custom ROM you want to install and check the supported phones they have listed and buy one of those models for installing the ROM

1

HTC (Wildfire, Desire Z, [rip!]), Samsung (they are/were easy to flash; S3, S5, S7, A5 2017).
I once had Nexus 5 (by LG [rip!]) - I was disappointed, poor quality.

Nowadays, you should have control of a baseband firmware too!
So, looks like the Pixels are the best option.

1
lemmy.zip

The hardware is wholly unremarkable, but the pixel line supports Graphene. Custom Roms are a necessity if you care about privacy even a little bit, but there are other options.

Unfortunately in many places, illegal searches are the rule, not the exception and as such security is almost as critical. If you need security AND privacy there is simply no substitute.

Motorola hardware looks kinda nice though...

1
sh.itjust.works

Be careful with Motorola, here's a Louis Rossmann rant about Lenovo/Motorola sucking, and here's the official unlocking policy and procedure he mentioned. Some specific issues to call out:

  • need to wait a week before unlocking the bootloader after purchase
  • you lose your Motorola warranty
  • you cannot sell or transfer your unlocked device (in linked legal agreement)

That's pretty scummy IMO, and why I'm not interested in Motorola devices. I don't intend to ever use the warranty or sell my phone, but I'm not okay with that being a legally binding agreement.

1
dblsaikoreply
discuss.tchncs.de

you cannot sell or transfer your unlocked device (in linked legal agreement)

The fuck? There's no way they can forbid doing that, right? Video game publishers would be all over that with physical discs to make it the same as for digital releases.

1

Unlocked meaning you've unlocked the bootloader. So if you want to flash your own ROM, you agree not selling your device.

I'm not sure if it's enforceable, but it certainly chills people from trying.

1

So I’ve gone back and forth between Apple and Android for the past decade and a half: I currently daily an iPhone 12 mini because I like the UI, size, ease of use, and the fact that I don’t use my phone as a multimedia device. If I could do akin to GrapheneOS or CalyxOS on iPhone I’d stick to it.

In the future once my iPhone breaks or finally becomes obsolete, I intend to go to either a used Pixel or a Fairphone. Both are supported by secure OSs but I also dislike how big both of them are.

TLDR: love iPhones, appreciate Fairphones.

1