Spyke
sh.itjust.works

Neither, but if I had to choose, maybe backwards in time. Assuming I can't accidentally kill myself, I would be sad to not have my friends and family as well as missing technology, but I think I could make life work out.

Going to the future seems like an extremely high risk. Uncertainty of whether the my country exists, the world, and what I can do to survive. I'd be extremely behind in tech which sucks bad.

4

What? I'd say it's pretty safe to assume the USA will be around in 50 years.

remembers that a large portion of Lemmy users aren't actually from America

Oh. Right. There is a great deal of turmoil and war in the world. I guess some nations actually are at risk of collapsing.

.........soooo, like which country we talking? Canada? I could see Canada collapsing. Mostly as they fight among themselves about what to do about the great problem of keeping violent gun waving American lunatics out! I mean c'mon Toronto! Detroit is RIGHT THERE, and you don't have a contingency plan??? Canada should build a wall.

/s

2
lemmy.world

Good one! I would really like to see 50 into the future, but I bet the past would be safer (unsure of that).

I suppose I'll take the future just for the adventure.

3
Brickhead92reply
lemmy.world

Depends if you're playing the game on easy mode, or hard mode. See South Park Game difficulty slider

4

Depends on in what way? Going back means I can change history, be rich, ... Going forward only means I get to see a future while still young.

If I can't change the past, then obviously going back is going to be a pile of crap with everything bad repeating.

2

You reached the end

WYR: Travel to the past by 50 years or the future by 50 years? | Spyke