Spyke
sopuli.xyz

And no i don't think Israel did nothing wrong, its not apartheid however.

"Broadly speaking, apartheid was delineated into petty apartheid, which entailed the segregation of public facilities and social events, and grand apartheid, which dictated housing and employment opportunities by race."

How is it not apartheid?

Edit: wait a minute, why am I arguing with two cookie-based accounts that are pro-Israel and less than a week old on this thread...

28

As much as I agree, Chomsky is no trustworthy source on what is or isn't a genocide

The man has bent himself in so many knots denying what happened in the yugoslav wars that I'm pretty sure Bosnia would actively refuse to prosecute if someone shot the bastard in broad daylight in the middle of Sarajevo.

7

genocide is what some people on both sides want to do and it's sad that they are influential enough that no resolution of this conflict is in sight in my lifetime -.-

9
Rozaŭtunoreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

TIL criticizing a government is exactly the same as being racist towards its whole nation.

41
JustMy2creply
lemm.ee

I don't think you are making anyone more empathetic towards your goal of killing civilians so you cna have even more stolen land.

Honestly, by now I think YOU can be blamed for anti semitism. By being a literal asswipe of a combo of fake religion, inbreeding and TERROR.

20

Both the wording of the rule and the use of the rule was very clear that this was about all criticism of Israel unless it's "criticism" like "Israel doesn't do enough to protect itself".

That "guideline" is hate-speech and genocide-apologism in it's most cynical form because it is disguised as anti-discrimination. The people who proposed and implemented it should be ostracized.

21
iainreply
feddit.nl

Being anti-colonialist is forbidden? Is it antisemitism because this time the colonizers claim to do it in the name of Judaism?

6

According to Wikipedia:

Settler colonialism occurs when colonizers invade and occupy territory to permanently replace the existing society with the society of the colonizers.

10
Maevereply
kbin.social

There is a fine line, however, restricting the ability to criticize genocide is not a good thing— unless people consider Palestinians as subhuman, subanimal, which we acknowledge some do.

19

40,000 confirmed civilian deaths in 3 months isnt genocide? Israeli's are openly murdering anyone who looks even vaguely Palestinian in Gaza and the West Bank

10

The only reason Gaza isn't being called a concentration camp with a theoretical government at this point is because the west largely aren't aware that Israel subjects holocaust survivor families to abject poverty and being called Soap People.

They were literally caught stealing the reparation payments intended for the victims and their families, so much so that a NGO is now the responsible party for distributing the remaining survivor payments.

They openly cooperate with neo nazi and neo nazi associated movements in the west because the more hostile westerners are to jews the more settlers they can claim need to he housed by evicting and killing Palestinians.

These guys sure are doing a fucking lot of nazi shit for how offensive everyone seems to think pointing out they're doing stuff the Nazis did is.

8
reddthat.com

Assholes. Its not criticism its terrorism support! Nobody cares about these "artists"

-130
PonyOfWarreply
pawb.social

Even if you believe Israel to be completely justified in everything they do, there should never be a blanket ban on criticizing the methods of a country at war.

61
reddthat.com

The ban wasn't on criticism it was on their blunt antisemitism and terrorism support. There has been lost of criticism in Germany about Israels methods.

-62
PonyOfWarreply
pawb.social

Sure, it was, at least according to the article. Emphasis mine:

which explicitly forbids any speech that “questions Israel’s right to exist” or criticizes the country’s occupation of Palestinian land.

45
muelltonnereply
feddit.de

And that is why Vice is a trash publication. Here is the correct text:

„Alle potenziellen Zuwendungsempfängerinnen und –empfänger bekennen sich damit zu einer vielfältigen Gesellschaft und gegen jede Form von Antisemitismus gemäß der Antisemitismus-Definition der International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) und ihrer Erweiterung durch die Bundesregierung. Sie verpflichten sich dazu, alles Notwendige zu veranlassen, um sicherzustellen, dass die gewährten Fördergelder keinen Vereinigungen zugutekommen, die als terroristisch und/oder extremistisch eingestuft werden.“ "All potential grant recipients are thus committed to a diverse society and against all forms of antisemitism in accordance with the definition of antisemitism of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) and its extension by the German government. They undertake to take all necessary steps to ensure that the funding granted does not benefit associations that are classified as terrorist and/or extremist."

https://www.tagesspiegel.de/kultur/chialo-erlass-gegen-antisemitismus-berlins-kultureinrichtungen-bekommen-neue-forderrichtlinien-11006422.html

And what is in the IHRA-definition?

"Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews that can be expressed as hatred towards Jews. Anti-Semitism is directed in word or deed against Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property as well as against Jewish community institutions or religious institutions. In addition, the state of Israel, which is understood as a Jewish collective, can also be the target of such attacks."

https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/kultur-und-gesellschaft/-/216610

There's nothing in there about "criticising the countries occupation of Palestinian lands". You just can't fucking mask your antisemitism by raging against Israel.

4

That is some valuable context, thank you. Definitely seems like skewed reporting from Vice. The definition as you posted it definitely seems better than what Vice reported, though its last sentence is so vague that it could easily be used to silence criticism, whether it was meant to do that or not.

12
reddthat.com

Yes "Palestinia" has claimed to own the entire land Israel. So in short, Antisemitism.

-51
lemm.ee

Wanting foreign invaders out of the land they stole almost a century ago is not antisemetic.

29
reddthat.com

It is, its idiotic and they stole the land as well.

This is the same argument Russia has for Ukraine btw.

-33

No they didn't. Even the christian crusaders, who where happy to commit pogroms against jews in Europe as a sort of "motivational entertainment" had to note the peaceful coexistence of jews, christians and muslims under islamic rule.

The Palestinians of today are the descendants of the biblical abrahamic tribes. White european, often secular, jews, who now control Israel are killing the people whose lineage is closer to David and Abraham, than theirs could ever be.

30

It is, its idiotic and they stole the land as well.

I know you and your ilk don't care about that, but no they didn't. The Palestinians of today are the same Palestinians of 2000 years ago. Palestine wasn't only Jews.

17

Wow that makes all Germans anti semites as well?

Cause they want their own country SOVEREIGN and some jews happen to live there?

7

They did until Balfour decided to just take land from people already there and arbitrarily draw new lines on a map, probably with a sharpie.

6
cdf12345reply
lemmy.world

Maybe someone should take your free speech away, asshole

11

Please keep it civil here. After all we can still discuss and explain why some opinions are objectively bad.

16