Spyke
feddit.de

for legal responsibility hosting an instance, if someone posts illegal content, whatever, it should be possible to hide it from public access.

1
lemmy.ml

Given that purge exists, it seems like showing the content when you go to them makes sense.

The only other idea I have is implementing a click to reveal, but that seems like overkill to me.

0
Dessalinesreply
lemmy.ml

Purge ( IE full database delete ) doesn't exist yet, but I've been working on it recently.

The danger with showing mod-removed content is that it still might not be a good thing to allow people to access it. IE lets say a post has a bunch of racist ranting, and a mod removes it. Currently that's being blanked out if you go to that post.

0

My mistake, I misunderstood and thought purge was already present.

I think my tendency would be to consider there to be about 3 categories of content. In parentheses is the result that I would probably go with when classifying the content in that category.

  • Rule Violation (can be viewed upon click)
  • Reprehensible (cannot be viewed)
  • Banned/Illegal (purged from the DB)

Clearly banned/illegal or reprehensible content would also be rule violations in most cases, so I more mean that rule violation is the minimum category to be moderated and that a rule violation isn't excluded from the other categories, etc.

1

FBI or police of your country may require the material if illegal, but then, public access should be blocked ... i guess. Did you know Switzerland made apology of genocide illegal ?

-1

You reached the end

Need community feedback on this issue: Should posts / communities be blanked out after being removed? | Spyke