Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Data Saver: per-app mobile data for the billing cycle, with a background split and per-network blocking. No INTERNET permission.

I like its simple UI, I will probably give it a try at some point.

Protected apps — Google Play Services

Whether it's a fature is arguable... Isn't a warning better?

---

Btw. The most interesting feature I've seen in firewall app was: blocking all traffic, but showing a notification "X app tries to access internet" [Allow] [Block] [Allow once]

The Allow/Block options added it to white/black-list so the notification doesn't appear again.

But the "Allow once" option was the interesting part. It blocked by default, but when user choose to allow once it gained temporary permission to communicate over network. I don't remember if it allowed access for as long as the app stayed in foreground or just for some predefined time. Sadly after some app update it was removed and I never seen any other firewall implement that option since.

Is something like this outside of the scope of the project?

Comment on

*Permanently Deleted*

The only scenario where I see disabling downvotes as a good idea is when upvotes are disabled as well.

So you either:

  • have only number of views (no up/down votes) so people don't chase virtual points
  • or there are both of them so that when combined they result in a fair rating.

Upvoting without downvoting doesn't show if people like it, nor whether it is good or bad. It only shows that it reached a lot of people and is popular. And that can be achieved with views alone.