Spyke

Replies

CoMaps

Comment on

CoMaps now on F-Droid!

Reply in thread

The Organic Maps project was described as community-driven, but shareholders were making a number of decisions without the community's input, and even without the community being aware that decisions are being made. While the use of donations is concerning, it wasn't the main problem. When people contribute their time and money to the project so that it can be for the entire community, but it turns out the shareholders are open to selling the contributors' work for their own profit - that becomes problematic. After Maps.me was sold, it added paid subscriptions and a crypto wallet, which destroyed the entire experience. And it appears Organic Maps risks the same problem.

CoMaps

Comment on

CoMaps Mission

There was discussion about this, it's a good conversation to have. The path for CoMaps is that it will be a general purpose navigation app, that can replace apps like Google Maps, and is good for several scenarios. Although there is still work to do until it gets there, for example estimate route time estimates. The idea is that while we work on making this app for general purpose, the focus is on narrower use cases like hiking, where people often need to be offline. And as the experience improves, the focus will also change.

CoMaps is moving quickly, it appears much faster than Organic Maps did, so I'm really excited about what we will accomplish! Thank you to everyone's support and contribution!

CoMaps

Comment on

Introducing the CoMaps Logo!

Reply in thread

While portraying Organic Maps as a community-driven project, shareholders were making decisions behind closed doors - a Kayak ad affiliate link was added, parts of the open-source code was hidden, and shareholders are leaving the door open for selling the company and pocketing profit from contributor work (this would likely go the unfortunate route of Maps.Me).

CoMaps

Comment on

Add Address In Editor

Reply in thread

This scenario you describe was common because the algorithm previously didn’t consider time for road features like turns, traffic lights, stop signs, etc, so it sometimes made choices for the route that saved seconds, but seemed puzzling. In the latest release of the app, the algorithm was updated to consider road features, which makes the route more optimized and should have much less unusual route choices. Plus, the route time estimation is realistic now. Some tuning of the algorithm may still be needed as this is new, but overall you should see improved routes.

CoMaps

Comment on

Who is CoMaps?

Reply in thread

Great question, we do have plans to create it! Since we have not yet incorporated as a non-profit, there are extra steps to set this up, and we're working on it right now. Thank you for your support, we appreciate you very much!

CoMaps

Comment on

Does CoMaps use Wikidata "also known as" data?

This is a great idea! Would you be able to create an issue here: https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/issues

This could improve search for many points of interests.

There is quite a bit of work to be done with search to improve it. Right now data is not pulled from Wikidata, so this additional source would need to be added.

If there is anyone who is familiar with developing search and/or C++ and interested in contributing to CoMaps, this would be a great project!