I’m yet to understand how doing my basic civic duty, in reporting all the CSAM I’ve come across in light of obvious administrative negligence; is crusading

And again, just because there are larger platforms that have the material, does not necessarily remove the risk at hand

I’ve actively been doing this, and pretty much everything I can do as a civilian legally; and I can personally say it has done utterly nothing to address the situation at hand

https://lemmy.world/post/49041435

I whistleblew this too

The following reports are matters both me, and others; have submitted regarding a single gen alone

National Center for Missing & Exploited Children; cases regarding Child Sex Exploitation (CSE), Child Sexual Assault Material (CSAM), URLGF (Unconsensual Real Life Gore Footage), and RGR (Recorded Gang Rape):

Case ID: 249451324 Case ID: 249451324 Case ID: 247759639 Case ID: 249540283 Case ID: 249542360 Case ID: 249542716 Case ID: 249543071 Case ID: 249542931 Case ID: 249544938 Master Case ID (Collective Act Against the Chatroom Generally): 247751090 Master Case ID (Primary Child Sexual Exploitation / Trafficking Report): 249570170

Cloudfare submissions: Case ID: Case ID: laacur-20260708-N10

Report submitted to the IWF: Original URL: https://www.iwf.org.uk/en/uk-report/thank-you/ CaseID: 83913N2ee2Â

Canadian Cybertip case: Case ID: bt6vjb-20260712-N12.

^

It does, see my lower reply

Billions must lie

Monumental levels of attention seeking dude

Calling whistleblowing on a literal federal crime isn’t “crusading”

I’m so sorry mate, I don’t want to “bully” you by pointing out your claims are quite bogus, dude. Thank you for understanding my friend

Or are you using one that has these horrible comments? Stop looking at the comments.

Ah yes! The good ‘ol’ let’s ignore literal child sexual exploitation / trafficking!

Do you understand how ignorant this sounds

Billions must lie

I know a bunch of people, including myself, that would love to volunteer

There are many above, take time to read them or provide counter evidence I’m not associated with them either

It must be embarrassing to call csam distribution a farce

The issue ISNT private generation

The issue is what’s going on, on public generators

Billions must deflect

CSAM is criminal, no doubt. No justification exists for its creation or distribution. I would, however, point out that there are opportunities available to flag such material, or users promoting or seeking it, including the generator with comments that allow it. I’ve used some of the uncensored generators, but never comment if the option is available, because I don’t want to be involved with how others use the generator, even if only by being swept up in the inevitable investigation.

This problem is as old as the internet, and will always exist. AI actually makes it infinitely easier to bypass moderation and censorship! It seems to me that people who are trying to shut down sites like Perchance, which are not intended as venues for any kind of criminal activity, but rather are available for freedom of creation and expression, need to find something better to do with their time. If fighting CSAM is their life purpose, good on 'em! But they’re time and resources would definitely be better spent, and more effective, focused on legitimate targets, like those who actually produce CSAM, prey on children directly (the fact that minors can see or access adult content is another issue entirely!), and deliberately facilitate any component of that behavior.

Quite well put! Though, what I’ve been currently advocating, is the removal of a comment section on a specific generator that’s notorious for csam distribution

Yes, it is again; entirely absent currently. As I’ve stated before, certain users like MCMG were perma banned a great while back, and there has been absolutely no action to perma ban users that are actively distributing illegal materials as of roughly ~2 or so years ago; up to now. No, there isn’t moderation, please again by all means; prove recent moderation of the site specifically.

The explosion of malicious users didn't happen because of lookouts; it happened because the platform chose to operate an anonymous infrastructure with zero verification, unmoderated chat rooms, and a complete lack of background safety filters. Networks built like a digital vacuum inherently attract bad actors. Blaming the lookouts for the growth of a network is like blaming the fire department for the size of a fire because they arrived to map it. Global clearinghouses like NCMEC and the IWF do not issue active tracking numbers based on roleplayer roleplay or unverified text jokes; and I can personally attest to what they’re saying. In internet architecture, if a platform's central infrastructure is found to be systemically harboring or facilitating the automated exploitation of minors, the law treats the site as fundamentally unsafe for everyone, including casual users. The only tool an independent citizen possesses is to hand the technical coordinates to the entities that do hold those keys.

They’re largely underage, by largely I mean at least 99% of the population. The only adults present on the gen I’m referring too, were known as “Kingzler” and a bunch of anons. Kingzler tuned out to be a sextortionist sadly

Yes, I am. It’s really dumb users share their age at all, given the critical safety crisis

I’d advise they remove the comment section in that gen 🙏🏽