Comment on
Catholicism
Reply in thread
The abortions that I know, are strictly against Catholics.
Comment on
Catholicism
Reply in thread
The abortions that I know, are strictly against Catholics.
Comment on
Lemmy.world updated to 0.18.2
Reply in thread
Just for clarification: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_nonce
Comment on
Opinion - What are your thoughts on password managers? Do you use one? Would you recommend it to others?
Reply in thread
No it's not suspicious. It's an open source well vetted audited selfhosted password manager. If youve tried vaultwarden or the official image it's extremely easy to setup meaning a very low barrier for entry.
Comment on
I'm using compose wrong and I know it.
Reply in thread
You can reference a single or multiple containers in a compose stack.
docker compose -f /path/to/compose.yml restart NameOfServiceInCompose
Comment on
Opinion - What are your thoughts on password managers? Do you use one? Would you recommend it to others?
Reply in thread
No you don't if you selfhost.
Comment on
Sonarr-style auto-downloader for YouTube?
Reply in thread
Yeh Tubearchivist is a beast. A python Django app, Elasticsearch and Redis. It uses like 1-2 GB of ram for me. And although it works and has no issues for me as I'm quite good with docker and coupling apps together, it's always scary upgrading it. Broken redis-server many times, but seems to recover after deleting it and setting the settings again.
Comment on
My new favourite password manager
Reply in thread
Vaultwarden isnt a fork because bitwarden isn't selfhostable. Bitwarden has an official selfhosted version. Vaultwarden is a lightweight rust version of the backend. As the selfhosted version by bitwarden is quite fat. Vaultwarden uses the official webapp of the webvault in their fork.
Comment on
Uncommon Syncthing usecases
I use syncthing to sync the sysvol folder between my two samba ad domain controllers.
Comment on
Anyone self-hosters using IPv6 internally with k8s/k3s?
Reply in thread
Na IPv6 goes back to what ipv4 was when there isn't a public and private range. Private ranges were due to ip exhaustion. NAT is then used.
With ipv6 you subnet your Lan with ipv6 delegate range from your ISP. Basically it's like subnetting your lan with a public ipv4 range. No nat required. As a firewall is used to stop packets not NAT. Also ipv4 RFC1918 doesn't provide a few thousand for private, it provides 17 million.