The article of impeachment failed miserably. So many Democrats voted Nay. It was a complete waste of time.

I agree with you. People should see Trump's approval rating. He is doing well so far.

Big GOP win.

Way too early to anoint a successor.

I didn't search your user history. If your position is all the recent presidents are bad, then that is fine. I don't have an issue with that.

The article of impeachment failed miserably. So many Democrats voted Nay. It was a complete waste of everyone's time. Why can't the Democrats find something more productive to do?

Collective guilt and rage dumps aren’t legal arguments. You’re listing unrelated tragedies to justify condemning this specific incident without applying the actual legal standard. Self-defense law doesn’t change based on your opinion of police, ICE, or statistics — it asks whether, in that moment, a reasonable officer perceived an imminent threat. You don’t get to replace evidence and law with slogans, insults, or ‘all cops are the same’ logic. And no — anger at institutions doesn’t justify violence against agents or rewriting legal standards after the fact. Accountability comes through investigations and courts, not mobs or moral absolutism.

The ICE agent was hit by the car. Have you checked all the videos at different angles?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6fxKbXDjXxM

She didn't want to leave until all of a sudden she took off with the SUV and hit the ICE agent.

Seems like you don't have any arguments to counter my point. LOL

The SUV clearly moved toward the ICE agent as he fired, and the camera jerks at the same moment — while it’s not 100% visually confirmed, multiple angles suggest he was struck or at least hit by the force of the car.

Insults and wild hypotheticals don’t change the facts. The videos show the SUV moving forward as the officer fired — whether or not it was intentional, he had only split seconds to assess an imminent threat. Courts and federal use-of-force policy don’t expect perfect decisions, only reasonable ones under intense pressure. That’s the legal standard, not whatever caricature you’re trying to paint. Personal attacks don’t replace evidence or law. If you’re upset about what happened, the effective and responsible way to push for change is through peaceful protest and winning elections — not encouraging or celebrating violence against ICE, even if you strongly disagree with their actions.

Started under Biden's watch.

It’s quite a denial to claim that Trump didn’t make significant progress in stopping that war.

Seems like you have problems figuring out that wars are at different scales. The Israel-hamas war and Russia-Ukraine wars are large scale wars. Not all wars are the same. Just common sense really.

I’m not saying everything the officer did was flawless. What matters legally for self-defense is whether, in that split second, he reasonably perceived an imminent threat of serious harm or death.

He originally wasn't directly in front of the car. It was the car's reverse motion that put him directly in front of the car. Thus, he didn't create danger himself.

I saw a reasonably rational law abiding officer making reasonably rational decisions for his own safety while performing the task he was sent out to do.

The relative poverty rate and GDP growth compared to other developed countries show otherwise.

The wars that Trump is working to end, and on which he has made significant progress within less than one month of his inauguration, are the Israel-Hamas war and the Russia-Ukraine war.

Legal self-defense isn’t about hindsight or perfection — it’s about whether a reasonable officer in that split second perceived an imminent threat, which the footage supports. That’s why courts don’t require flawless decisions, only reasonable ones under the circumstances.