They're taking the hobbits to Isengard!
Originally posted by u/FarleyFilm on r/2007scape
Posts
The Notorious R.2.H.
Originally posted by u/IStuntman on r/2007scape
Doom is GIGA bugged atm: becomes invincible if you kill it as shield phase starts
Originally posted by u/ManyCookies on r/2007scape
Menu Entry Swapper
Hi, Is the Menu entry swapper messed up again? If i swap an obstacle, for example the escape portal at CG and swap escape for walk here, my attack options on the npc are also down in the menu so i just click walk here on the npc. I seem to have it at all npc's. Is there an easy fix for me? submitted by /u/Signal_Patient_698
Originally posted by u/Signal_Patient_698 on r/OSRSMobile
The Notorious R.2.H.
Originally posted by u/IStuntman on r/OSRSMobile
which LLM as of today?
Originally posted by u/cidara on r/ClaudeCode
Looking for people to follow who designs systems to ship code developed with AI agents end-to-end
Today I watched a workshop, probably recorded by one of the people attended the Zoom call and shared over X, and I loved it. The speaker was from Cursor and talked about her own genuine experience in developing the the systems at work that ship hundred of PRs every month w/o her touching the code at all -- aside from her working on the environment, harness, constraints, rules where these agents operate. What I liked also how she actually showed it, explained it, and her communication sounded pure hands-on experience. And more importantly, throughout the video she looked really tired and but energetic at the same time if you know what I mean. Tired because of solving real problems, and energetic because of solving real problems unlike those YouTubers or many X folks with overly energetic acts coming from speaking about AI rather than what they really do with AI at work. So for people like me who are away from the source of all this, which is Silicon Valley, I am really trying to access those resources; the resources that were not highly censored for much wider public view. I am doing progressively more AI driven automated deliveries at work, and I really want to learn from the masters in the field. Unfortunately not living in Silicon Valley and cannot attend those live meetings in person or not being informed about these digital workshops and zoom calls thru the active community is already leaving us behind. But I am sure some of those videos are shared like the one I watched today. But the question is where? In what communities or discord groups should I join? Any videos like that you watch and find extremely useful? Whom to follow on X or Reddit that fits this criteria? The kind hearted people of Reddit :), can you please help all of us here? There are those people who already work in the timelines that would be considered as future for the rest of the industry, and I love to learn from them. submitted by /u/Firm-Lobster-1040
Originally posted by u/Firm-Lobster-1040 on r/ClaudeCode
I've been using coding agents in lanes instead of one chat doing the whole job
I've been using coding agents in lanes instead of one chat that does the whole job. A lead figures out the work and files a GitHub issue. Then separate runs do implementation, QA, review, and CI. There's a telemetry lane for when you don't know what broke or a path just died. floor starts the next lane. Nobody implements, reviews, and merges in the same session. When a lane finishes, it writes started , done , blocked , or failed . The next process reads that before it does anything. That's SQLite on this machine, plus a GitHub comment so the trail isn't stuck on one laptop. The PR can come from an agent. I still merge it. The CLI is a plug. Same rules on Claude, Codex, and Grok. I've been running this on my own repos and gave it to a few mates. One of them liked how it kicks off the next lane, which is what made me put the repo up. If you already live in coding agents, I'd like to see it on a messy repo, or hear how you'd cut the lanes differently. https://github.com/Kripu77/software-factory submitted by /u/NewAmbition8911
Originally posted by u/NewAmbition8911 on r/ClaudeCode
My Claude Code skill caught a bug in a popular FastAPI template that the human review missed by actually running the code, not just reading it
So I've been building an Agent Skill for Claude Code that does backend performance reviews, and something happened while I was testing it that I think is worth sharing. To sanity-check the thing, I set up an experiment: review the same real public repo twice. Once by me, reading the code carefully. And once by a completely separate agent that had zero memory of my review — I just handed it the skill and the repo and told it to go. It found something I'd completely missed. Buried in fastapi/full-stack-fastapi-template there's this line: except InvalidTokenError, ValidationError: That's Python 2 syntax. In Python 3 that's a straight-up SyntaxError the module can't even be imported. The whole app is dead on arrival. I had read that exact file. I skimmed right past it because I was reading for logic bugs, not syntax, and my brain just... pattern-matched it as fine. The other agent caught it because instead of reading the file, it ran an actual parser against every file in the repo. It didn't "notice" the bug, it proved the bug, and I felt a little dumb. Anyway, that's kind of the whole point of this project. I got tired of AI code review tools that do one of two things: spit out a generic checklist ("check your indexes," "consider caching," thanks, very helpful), or just make stuff up invented latency numbers, imaginary query plans, telling you to add Redis to an app with fourteen users. Both of those come from the same problem: nothing is actually checking whether a claim has evidence behind it. So I leaned hard into that as the design constraint. The skill is explicitly allowed — encouraged, even to come back with zero findings if that's what the evidence supports, instead of padding the report to look thorough. Every finding gets scored on severity and confidence separately, and the priority is derived from a fixed matrix rather than picked, so you don't get "this feels High" reasoning. And the technology knowledge is split so a Postgres review never drags in document-store logic right now 13 engines (Postgres, MongoDB, Redis, Node, Python, JVM, Go, .NET, Rust, MySQL, DynamoDB, Kafka, RabbitMQ) get full depth, everything else is honest about being shallower instead of faking it. I ran that same "review it twice, once blind" experiment on four different real repos, not toy examples. Every single time, the blind pass matched or beat my own review, usually because it found evidence I had sitting right in front of me and didn't use properly. The FastAPI one is just the most dramatic. To be clear about what this isn't: coverage is still narrow, I haven't compared it against an actual human expert doing the same review, and everything tested so far is Go or Python no JVM/.NET/Rust repo has been through this blind-check yet. That's all in the repo, I'm not hiding the gaps. If you've got Claude Code, it's two commands: /plugin marketplace add Sanoy24/backend-performance-review /plugin install backend-performance-review Repo's MIT licensed, here: https://github.com/Sanoy24/backend-performance-review Genuinely, if you run it on your own stuff and it says something dumb or wrong, tell me. That's more useful to me than a star. submitted by /u/Alarmed_Offer_3213
Originally posted by u/Alarmed_Offer_3213 on r/ClaudeCode
Is there a skills that reduce tokens usage?
im using caveman its a good skill , is there similiar skills ? submitted by /u/MousTN
Originally posted by u/MousTN on r/ClaudeCode
Controlled ways to improve Claude working speed?
I'm generally happy with the workflow approach of interacting directly with Fable, and using Fable as planner, orchestrator and for acceptance, while having it delegate implementation and grunt work to Opus sub-agents. However my main frustration is that these Opus workers feel like they're running in molasses - compared e.g. to Sol workers. Even the most straight-forward mechanical task can end up being a multi-hour adventure. The workers are not sitting around waiting for slow tests or extensive validation runs, they are mostly actively working, actually reading references, existing code and API documentation and producing output. I will say that I am running Opus/xhigh effort - and while not all tasks would require that, many of the harder ones do actually need to for output results to be acceptable, and I'd rather not risk having to re-do or getting sub-par work by defaulting to a cheaper/faster model. Is this just what it is right now? I would like to start experimenting a bit more with fast mode, but it's not clear to me how that interacts with the whole workflow system. I don't think my quota would survive for long running multiple Opus/xhigh workers at fast, and selectively switching them to fast after they've been started is supposedly not great for token usage. Is it feasible to ask Fable to 'juggle' worker effort and fast mode as appropriate for each task? Or do I just need to remember to specifically call this out every time I approve a new milestone start? Are there any other techniques to get more speed except lowering the model/effort? submitted by /u/SnuffleBag
Originally posted by u/SnuffleBag on r/ClaudeCode
Have you ever seen Claude make a typo?
I just had Claude say "untucketed" when trying to say "unticketed" I have never seen this before on any LLM 😅 submitted by /u/NanoIsAMeme
Originally posted by u/NanoIsAMeme on r/ClaudeCode
I can tell when I'm being A/B tested with nerfd models because Claude won't show me any popup asking me "How is Claude doing in this session?"
Originally posted by u/LividCan4323 on r/ClaudeCode
Claude is the jargon master
Topic has probably been beat to death but they seriously thought making claude say the most overcomplicated nonsense was the definition of intelligence. Jargon is my red flag now. I can tell it doesn't know what it's doing (or shit is about to go off the rails) when it reads like jargon. It is incapable of holding onto a simple, one sentence high level concept and following that for an extended period of time. I have to remind it what we're doing every ~3 prompts or its understanding of what we did 10 minutes ago will completely degrade and derail from the target. Everything i've been saying has been about fable, by the way. Opus? Not even worth using. submitted by /u/Zestybeef10
Originally posted by u/Zestybeef10 on r/ClaudeCode
I am ditching .mp4 for use with Claude. Instead use an oss .cdaf (AI-friendly) format for 91% cost efficiency
If you have tried editing videos with claude, you already know the reason. .mp4 is flawed. You just can't give a whole video file to claude's context for it to edit. I am talking about B-rolls, raw footages, assets, SVGs, etc. A 3 min 4k or 1080 video will eat 100K of tokens at minimum. Go 2-3 times back-and-forth and the limit is exhausted. Plus.. the latency increases hugely and the accuracy/efficiency decreases exponentially. And at this point, if you think using hyperframes or remotion is easy, god bless you! I have open sourced a .cdaf or 'cached descriptive asset file' format. It stores she256-encrypted timestamped visual description of videos and links it to the original .mp4 file. Anytime your Claude wants to use a video, it uses the .cdaf file to read what scene it should pick from it or what duration and then continues the edit. We tested on benchmarks -
- 91% token and cost reduction
- 65% latency reduction Everything is in the evals & bench. Try it out and ask me if you have an open Q. submitted by /u/Uditakhourii
Originally posted by u/Uditakhourii on r/ClaudeCode
How do you guys actually deal with UI fixes in Claude Code?
This is probably the part of using agents I find the most annoying. Like I’ll get a page mostly working, then when I actually look through it there are loads of small things wrong. Spacing, weird alignment, button too big, something looks off on mobile, etc. At the moment I usually end up taking screenshots and explaining each thing one by one, or just writing a big list. What do you guys do? Do you just describe it all to Claude, paste screenshots, use Playwright/browser tools, annotate stuff, or something else? Mainly wondering how people handle it when there are like 10 small visual changes rather than one obvious bug. submitted by /u/Character_Total4468
Originally posted by u/Character_Total4468 on r/ClaudeCode
Getting two 5x account vs. 20x account due to weekly limits
I have recently researched that having a 20x account does NOT give 20x weekly limit vs. the pro account T_T Was wondering if anyone has experience on whether handling two 5x account would give you better mileage for weekly limit or is it proportional. I remembered someone did a research on a reddit post (I couldn't find it) where they experienced slightly more usage for all models but slightly less for fable vs. having two 5x account. submitted by /u/innovaldragon
Originally posted by u/innovaldragon on r/ClaudeCode
Who is the asshole who decided to include session URLs in PRs by default?
What nimrod, bone-headed, self-indulgent, tasteless, brainless motherfucker thought it would be OK to change the default attribution of the harness to include URLs to your sessions in contributions? submitted by /u/erratic_parser
Originally posted by u/erratic_parser on r/ClaudeCode