Comment on
90% of "vote blue no matter who" discourse on lemmy
Reply in thread
Yet you think people who can't even be bothered to vote are going to show up for the revolution. How has that worked out in the last decade? Where are y'all?
Comment on
90% of "vote blue no matter who" discourse on lemmy
Reply in thread
Yet you think people who can't even be bothered to vote are going to show up for the revolution. How has that worked out in the last decade? Where are y'all?
Comment on
90% of "vote blue no matter who" discourse on lemmy
Reply in thread
The last decade has only proven that the "burn it down" crowd (who are super active online, but don't show up IRL to vote against fascists) are never going to show up IRL for the revolution.
Comment on
90% of "vote blue no matter who" discourse on lemmy
Reply in thread
Please elaborate on France. Compare their size and current political climate to the United States (the country I live it) and outline how to accomplish whatever it is you are alluding to within the confines of reality.
Comment on
90% of "vote blue no matter who" discourse on lemmy
Reply in thread
My country isn't ethical. I don't even need to think about that. Still not going to use my vote to let MORE genocide happen.
Comment on
90% of "vote blue no matter who" discourse on lemmy
Reply in thread
This changes nothing. When you have the choice to prevent 1 genocide or not prevent it at all, what would you do?
Comment on
90% of "vote blue no matter who" discourse on lemmy
Reply in thread
Voting to stop 1 genocide is a problem? Impact > Intent. If the intent of your vote is to punish some person or party and the impact of that choice is worse, that's a problem.