Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.
greedy corps going against law as usual.
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.
greedy corps going against law as usual.
Comment on
Spez (Reddit CEO) just put out an announcement talking about how they'll verify bots vs humans. Get ready for a wave of new users into the Fediverse pretty soon!
Reply in thread
I'm totally with you, I would also add that recently meta said that they wanted to add facial recognition to their "smart" glasses.
they said that "We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns"
Source:
https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-ray-ban-smart-glasses-facial-recognition-distracted-2026-2?op=1
Comment on
Spez (Reddit CEO) just put out an announcement talking about how they'll verify bots vs humans. Get ready for a wave of new users into the Fediverse pretty soon!
I was waiting for this move, it was the final straw. now I'm here, happily writing a comment in the fediverse through blorp (foss).
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
So this war is far from an end huh?
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
PLEASE
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
hopefully no. but we are still in danger
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
I think that Patrick posted it. basically the ones against where the conservatives, both left and right where against (even if there were some people inside those parities who voted to continue the scanning)
EDIT: apparently EPP voted against not because they want to support privacy but because the proposal was not enough invasive. they were afraid that it would have stopped their Chat control 2.0 proposal.
Comment on
Premium Privacy Services: are they really that private ?
you can pay for proton via cash in mailbox (sending cash to their address with account details)
Comment on
France: Islamic scholar Tariq Ramadan gets 18 years for rape
not enough, where is life sentence when needed?
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
i don't understand, was EPP for or against the extension ? Cause my understanding was that they asked to have a second vote even if the first one already rejected the extension.
Comment on
Spez (Reddit CEO) just put out an announcement talking about how they'll verify bots vs humans. Get ready for a wave of new users into the Fediverse pretty soon!
Reply in thread
hey, nice to meet you here! I was wondering if it's a problem that only I have or if it's still in development but I have issues playing videos inside blorp. Could you please help? I really like blorp's UI and I don't want to change.
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
sorry I was mislead due to the results, apparently EPP voted against cause it was not ENOUGH invasive. I will edit it now.
Comment on
Spez (Reddit CEO) just put out an announcement talking about how they'll verify bots vs humans. Get ready for a wave of new users into the Fediverse pretty soon!
Reply in thread
for example, I tried to play this video but it didn't work.
not sure if the problem is on my side or not.
https://threadiverse.link/lemmy.world/post/44647866
EDIT: I forgot to thank you for your help and time, it's nice to see devs so dedicated to their projects
Comment on
Spez (Reddit CEO) just put out an announcement talking about how they'll verify bots vs humans. Get ready for a wave of new users into the Fediverse pretty soon!
Reply in thread
THANKS, I'll update as soon as possible.
Comment on
The Battle Over Chat Control: How EU Governments and the Tech Lobby Are Trying to Overturn Parliament's Vote — A Comprehensive Fact Check
Reply in thread
actually it didn't passed.
Comment on
CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT
Reply in thread
as another comment said, EPP was against this proposal due to it being not strict enough. They want full control of your chat (e2ee ones too). they were afraid that this would set a precedent for limits for chat control and voted againts
Comment on
EU lawmakers vote to make it easier to set up migrant detention centers outside the bloc
it was about time
Comment on
Report: EU Commission wants to involve US more closely in tech regulation
Reply in thread
and unfortunately they have a lotbof power