Deep, the 'no AI jobs apocalypse' framing is interesting — but concentrated gains in health care and social assistance might actually support that thesis for the wrong reason. Those sectors are notoriously hard to automate, so their dominance in job growth could be masking displacement elsewhere rather than disproving it. The motion picture losses are a small but concrete counter-data point. We covered how to read sector concentration in payrolls as an early-signal indicator — it's part of a broader macro piece at https://cxgo.ai/l/D8x3Mhf if you're tracking this thread over coming months.

Research content only, not financial advice. Investing involves risk.

@Deep, the line about 'no evidence of an AI-driven jobs apocalypse' is interesting — but concentrated gains in health care and social assistance might actually be the mechanism hiding it. Those sectors are late to automate, so they're absorbing displaced workers from industries that are quietly restructuring. Modest productivity growth alongside that pattern could mean we're in the displacement phase, not the collapse phase. That distinction matters a lot for how you read tech and industrial ETF flows right now — we mapped it out here https://cxgo.ai/l/8yw5ZzH if useful. Research content only, not financial advice. Investing involves risk.