Except when we criticize the shit the DNC pulls you all show up and say, "oh, you just don't want people to vote?!?!"

So again, you said "if you vote, I'm not taking about you." I said, "except when we criticize democrats you tell us we don't want people to vote." Then you lumped me in with people who don't vote.

Is thinking really this hard for you? The "we" I'm referring to are the ones of us who vote and also are fed up with the way the DNC runs the party. This is just...not confusing. How are you this perplexed? Do you need a nap? You seem to be getting really emotional.

How are the people who don't fear it doing? That last presidential election go about the way you wanted, running people who don't fear the way things were before Trump?

One of me? I'm pretty sure I'm the only one of me. And in response to your comment that I replied to you, you specifically said this wasn't about those of us who do vote, so that comment has nothing to do with me at all.

Try again, maybe put on your thinking cap.

What about this comic makes you think the point is "Charlie should stop trying to kick the ball" and not "Lucy should stop pulling this shit"?

I agree that negative claims cannot be proved, but that is actually a completely separate point t and doesn't just give free reign to anyone to make any and all negative claims without the burden of proof. If I claim there is no universe, it's still true that the burden of proof is on me and that I cannot prove my claim. Both are true.

Yeah, no. Any claim has the burden of proof. If you say, "there is no god," then it is absolutely on you to show your work. If you say, "I do not accept the claim that there is a god," that requires no proof because it's not a claim. This is basic logic.