Spyke

Posts

brussels·Brussels⚜byautonomousPunk

A small innertube for a hand-truck/dolly/diable: €17.50 at Brico, wtf?

A large bicycle tube is around €3 at Decathlon. Also at Decathlon, tubes for small scooter tires are upwards of €12. Those are close to the size of hand-truck wheels. Not sure why the price is so high. It’s much less material and with scooters clusterfucking the cities in such high numbers, surely the tubes would be manufactured in a completitive market.

The small wheel tubes start at €17.50 at Brico.

The best price I found was a small trottinet shop that charges €10. It was surprising to see the little guy undercut Decathlon. That’s still about double what I would expect. Can anyone suggest a shop that might be cheaper?

View original on belgae.social
1

🇳🇱 When Dutch merchants offer only an “e-receipt”, does this violate the EU PSD?

A cafe in Amsterdam was entirely digital. Had no paper menu. I had to borrow a personal smartphone from the staff to see the menu and to place an order. After paying, I asked for a receipt. They said they only give receipts by email. And because I borrowed a phone from a staff member, the receipt went to their email address. So if I were willing to supply an e-mail address, it would not matter because they had no control over that -- could not retroactively send a receipt copy. They had no printer to print a receipt.

The payment services directive (PSD) says:

Article 57
Information for the payer on individual payment transactions
1. After the amount of an individual payment transaction is debited from the payer’s account or, where the payer does not use a payment account, after receipt of the payment order, the payer’s payment service provider shall provide the payer, without undue delay and in the same way as laid down in Article 51(1), with all of the following information:
(a) a reference enabling the payer to identify each payment transaction and, where appropriate, information relating to the payee;
(b) the amount of the payment transaction in the currency in which the payer’s payment account is debited or in the currency used for the payment order;
(c) the amount of any charges for the payment transaction and, where applicable, a breakdown of the amounts of such charges, or the interest payable by the payer;
(d) where applicable, the exchange rate used in the payment transaction by the payer’s payment service provider, and the amount of the payment transaction after that currency conversion;
(e) the debit value date or the date of receipt of the payment order.

IIUC, by preconditioning the above info on having an email address, they are infringing on the law. Correct?

It’s rough reading because it says this obligation is on “the payer’s payment service provider”. Who is that? What does that mean? The payment service provider would be the merchant’s, no?

On the payer’s side of this, there is only their bank. The “without undue delay” bit seems to suggest this refers to a receipt on the spot, as banks generally only send a statement of account once per month.

View original on belgae.social
3

Does Belgium’s ban on cash transactions on basic accounts violate the EU PSD?

cross-posted from: https://belgae.social/post/2368676

Belgium has a ban on cash transactions with “basic” bank accounts. At the same time, the EU Payment Services Directive (PSD) says:

Article 35
Access to payment systems

  1. …
    Payment systems shall not impose on payment service providers, on payment service users or on other payment systems any of the following requirements:

(a) restrictive rule on effective participation in other payment systems;

Superficially, a cash ban would seem to block participation with another payment system. Of course the definition of “payment system” is relevant:

(7) ‘payment system’ means a funds transfer system with formal and standardised arrangements and common rules for the processing, clearing and/or settlement of payment transactions;

Cash is a payment system of the central bank. Does cash meet that definition?

View original on belgae.social
0

🇧🇪 Does Belgium’s ban on cash transactions on basic accounts violate the EU PSD?

Belgium has a ban on cash transactions with “basic” bank accounts. At the same time, the EU Payment Services Directive (PSD) says:

Article 35
Access to payment systems

  1. …
    Payment systems shall not impose on payment service providers, on payment service users or on other payment systems any of the following requirements:

(a) restrictive rule on effective participation in other payment systems;

Superficially, a cash ban would seem to block participation with another payment system. Of course the definition of “payment system” is relevant:

(7) ‘payment system’ means a funds transfer system with formal and standardised arrangements and common rules for the processing, clearing and/or settlement of payment transactions;

Cash is a payment system of the central bank. Does cash meet that definition?

Update: Belgium’s transposition of the law explicitly excludes cash as a ‘payment system’ :

Royal Decree of 11 MARCH 2018
Annex I.B. The following shall not be considered as payment services within the meaning of this Law:

  1. The execution of payment transactions exclusively in cash and going directly from the payer to the beneficiary, without the intervention of any intermediary

(^ machine translated)

View original on belgae.social
2
enshitification·EnshittificationbyautonomousPunk

🇧🇪 How Belgium rewards banks for enshitifying their digital service: by allowing banks to charge enshitification dodgers €88.10¹/yr for analog banking

cross-posted from: https://belgae.social/post/2365040

The linked page shows that Belgium cares just enough about preventing forcing the digital transformation down our throats to force banks to offer an analog means of access. But Belgium is okay with banks fleecing offline consumers to the tune of €62.50 €88.10¹/yr above and beyond the normal service costs, plus a bit more to pay for printed bank statements.

One disgusting side-effect is that there is no pressure on banks to avoid enshitification of their digital services. Normally when a digital mechanism is enshitified, we can use the analog mechanism instead. And rightly so if that costs the bank more -- they should factor that into their enshitification plans. But since analog customers must pay substantially more to offset the costs, there is no incentive not to enshitify the service. So the shitty choices are:

  • get enshitified access at a normal price; or
  • accept less convenient low-tech but non-enshitified service and pay €88.10¹+/yr more

It seems as if banks are in fact encouraged to enshitify their digital access because driving people to go analog is just an extra bonus revenue.

The original thread is here.

¹ Update: Originally posted €62.50, but that was in 2022. There is an index increasing the cost by €6.40 every year.

https://febelfin.be/en/services/universal-banking-serviceOpen linkView original on belgae.social
13
right_to_unplug·Right to be Offline / Offgrid / Analog / Unplugged 🔌📪📖📟📝byautonomousPunk

🇧🇪 Cost of the right to have analog access to banking in Belgium: €88.10¹/yr (as of 2026)

The linked page shows that Belgium cares just enough about preventing the forced digital transformation down our throats to pressure banks to offer an analog means of access. But Belgium is okay with banks fleecing offline consumers to the tune of €62.50 €88.10¹/yr above and beyond the normal service costs, plus a bit more to pay for printed bank statements.

One disgusting side-effect is that there is no pressure on banks to avoid enshitification of their digital services. Normally when a digital mechanism is enshitified, we can use the analog mechanism instead. And rightly so if that costs the bank more -- they should factor that into their enshitification plans. But since analog customers must pay substantially more to offset the costs, there is no incentive not to enshitify the service.

Perhaps the greatest injustice is that analog consumers get no refund for the cost of the digital infrastructure that they do not use. It’s comparable to being forced to pay for an MS Windows license on a PC that will only run linux anyway.

So the shitty choices are:

  • get enshitified access at a normal price; or
  • accept less convenient low-tech but non-enshitified service and pay €88.10¹+/yr more

It seems as if banks are in fact encouraged to enshitify their digital access because driving people to go analog is just an extra bonus revenue.

The original thread is here.

¹ Update: Originally posted €62.50, but that was in 2022. There is an index increasing the cost by €6.40 every year.

https://febelfin.be/en/services/universal-banking-serviceOpen linkView original on belgae.social
6
brussels·Brussels⚜byautonomousPunk

printer paper -- looking for the cheapest, thinnest, recycled

I went on a hunt recently for thin paper that can be fed into a laser printer. Most laser printers are spec’d to require a weight of at least 60 g/m². My findings:

  • NIAS <www.les-papeteries.be> : 500×A4 (60 g/m², not recycled) €8
  • Schleiper : 500×A4 (72 g/m², recycled) €7.16
  • Electrodepot: 500×A4 (80 g/m², not recycled)) €3.95

I’m not sure how climate impactful it is to use recycled vs. non-recycled, or a lighter weighted paper. But I’m sure it’s not great that the cheapest paper is non-recycled 80 g/m². The price climbs very quickly when deviating from 80 g/m² in either direction. We pay double the price for 60 g/m² which consumes 25% less material. WTF, capitalism.

If anyone knows of a better price /offline, in Brussels/ for recycled or thin paper, plz mention it here.

View original on belgae.social
1
brussels·Brussels⚜byautonomousPunk

Coriander bundles are not all created equal in Brussels

WTF is a bundle? It’s just some arbitrary unmeasured amount of stuff held together, like a handfull. If you go to the Sunday street markets at abbatoir and gare du midi, it’s clear that some of those sellers have hired people with tiny hands. The price is mostly €0.20—€0.30 per bundle. But some of those vendors sell bundles with like triple or quadruple as much as those with the skimpiest shortest bundles.

When produce is sold per piece like that, you take the biggest two pieces you can find over to the scale and make sure you’re getting the most for the price. Easy to do in a grocery store but the street market scales have lines of people and the herb dealers don’t even have a scale. Obviously a bit silly to carry your marijuana/cocaine/whatever scales around with you to the market to weigh your coriander.

View original on belgae.social
1

Commission: We are not going to protect rights that future law is removing anyway

Suppose someone’s rights under EU law are infringed. The member state refuses to enforce the law at the highest level. The victim asks the European Commission to enforce EU law against the offending member state. The EC¹ does a superficial preliminary check and agrees that the case can move forward (past the initial screening criteria).

After deeper checks, the EC decides that they will kill the case because they are proposing future law that will remove the right anyway. Is this legal?

It seems really bizarre and chaotic that as the law changes, and a legal case often takes years, enforcement would not be based on a snapshot of the law at the time the incident occurs. And it seems extra fucked up that they would base a decision to withhold legal action on the mere speculation of future law that will be proposed, not even a law that has at least passed in Parliament. But I’m not a lawyer.

Does the idea of enforcing law that does not match the law at the time of an incident have some kind of latin name or something so I can search more about this practice?

¹ Is “EC” an abbreviation for the European Commission, or the European Council? Not sure if it’s a safe acronym to use. Laws often have EC in the citiation.

Update

I think “ex ante” is the latin term which is the opposite of “ex post facto”. Though it does not seem to be specific to the legal practice of enforcing law before it is enacted.

View original on belgae.social
2
cooking·Science of CookingbyautonomousPunk

(Belgium) cannot find sodium citrate (for mac & cheese) 🧀

cross-posted from: https://belgae.social/post/2229041

I found only two sources in Brussels for “citrate de sodium”:

  • pharmacy: €50 for 250g
  • in a packet of lemon chicken flavoring in an Asian shop

I’m not going to pay €50 to a pharmacist in order to make a smoother macaroni and cheese. I’m also not interested in bringing in flavored Asian sauces. One option would be to go to the American section of a large grocery store and buy a Kraft mac & cheese kit. Fuck that. I boycott Kraft Heinz. Probably would not find Velvita, but if I did it’s a bit off to be making mac & cheese from scratch and then having to resort to a kit of sorts anyway.

Is there a better option?

It seems fondu with cheese is a thing here. How are people emulsifying their cheese for that?

Update: it’s apparently European additive “E331” which groups 3 different things. Are they about the same for emulsifying cheese? Note as well that it’s not in the emulsifier grouping of additives for some reason.

View original on belgae.social
9
brussels·Brussels⚜byautonomousPunk

[solved] Cannot find sodium citrate

I found only two sources in Brussels for “citrate de sodium”:

  • pharmacy: €50 for 250g
  • in a packet of lemon chicken flavoring in an Asian shop

I’m not going to pay €50 to a pharmacist in order to make a smoother macaroni and cheese. I’m also not interested in bringing in flavored Asian sauces. One option would be to go to the American section of a large grocery store and buy a Kraft mac & cheese kit. Fuck that. I boycott Kraft Heinz. Probably would not find Velvita, but if I did it’s a bit off to be making mac & cheese from scratch and then having to resort to a kit of sorts anyway.

Is there a better option?

It seems fondue with cheese is a thing here. How are people emulsifying their cheese for that?

Update: it’s apparently European additive “E331” which groups 3 different things. Are they about the same for emulsifying cheese? Note as well that it’s not in the emulsifier grouping of additives for some reason.

UPDATE: The one drug store in Brussels (Grande Droguerie du Lion) has the stuff. It’s cheap enough (€23/kg) and you can ask for any quantity (e.g. 50g) as they scoop it onto a scale anyway.

View original on belgae.social
3
brussels·Brussels⚜byautonomousPunk

Cannot find body bags in Brussels

I have 4 bodies to dump. Cannot find a shop in Brussels selling body bags. Tom & Co does not have them. So indeed, I need body bags for rats, not people, to be clear, if anyone was wondering.

Last I heard the rat population in Brussels outnumbered humans by a factor of 2 to 1. I wonder if that’s still the case.

What do people do with their dead rats? Carcasses are banned from the orange bags. It would be sensible to flash freeze them, grind them into powder, and add to compost. Just as Australians do with cane toads, IIRC.

View original on belgae.social
1
news·Belgian NewsbyautonomousPunk

ClientEarth v. Belgium - Collective complaint to the European Committee of Social Rights

The full text:

In this collective complaint, ClientEarth submits that Belgium has violated Article 11(1) and (3) of the Revised European Social Charter (the Charter) due to its failure to protect its population from the serious health impacts associated with exposure to Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pollution. Additionally, ClientEarth submits that Belgium is in violation of Article 11(2) of the Charter, because it has failed to provide appropriate health education and information on the health risks associated with PFAS.

https://www.clientearth.org/latest/press-office/documents/clientearth-v-belgium-collective-complaint-to-the-european-committee-of-social-rights/Open linkView original on belgae.social
2
brussels·Brussels⚜byautonomousPunk

mail recipient: “we don’t accept mail from particulars.. only corporations and bPost”

I suppose a private company can do what they want and perhaps fair enough if they don’t want mail from me.

But I was recently told by a government office that they do not accept mail from individuals. Only companies. They said: use bPost. This means paying for slower delivery. I can deliver a letter the same day I write it and it costs me nothing. It’s obviously an injustice to be forced by a government to spend money to hire a company with delivery competency issues -- who takes a week to move a letter 100m away if you are lucky enough to have a successful delivery.

Some gov offices will accept delivery from an individual but will not sign for it.

I recently encountered an mailbox for a company that was behind a locked door. This is common in some parts of Germany. The postal service gets exclusive access to the lobby with mailboxes.

View original on belgae.social
3

🇧🇪 Money that expires in Belgium: GSM gift cards. Do any member states protect consumers from this swindle?

cross-posted from: https://belgae.social/post/2046140

What’s the point of allowing money to expire? If you buy a top-up for a GSM account, what legit reason could there be for allowing carriers to screw over consumers on such an arbitrary basis? Indeed, if you buy phone credit in Belgium, it expires. I just bought a top-up card that had already expired because I did not notice the expiration date in tiny print.

Interesting to notice that some US states have banned gift cards that expire.

I cross-post this in [email protected] with a question: do any member states ban expiring gift cards?

View original on belgae.social
2