Spyke

Replies

mtg

Comment on

Won’t see this on any ban list

Reply in thread

While the statement in the OP is true, have you considered Pauper? If I understand correctly, while I haven't built a Pauper deck yet, the limitations on card rarity should make it very possible to build a strong deck without spending too much. There's also proxies, which cost a fraction of real cards and shpuld be good enough to play with

art

Comment on

Elenda, the Dusk Rose by Chris Rahn

Reply in thread

Powercreep is real. I'm just fresh out of a precons-only match where each one was two years newer than the previous one and the most recent one won with overwhelming advantage, the one in the middle did something and the oldest one did nothing

mtg

Comment on

Do you fake falling behind in Commander to avoid getting focused on?

Reply in thread

Yes, I guess that's what I meant! In my playgroup we're all new to MTG and I've noticed that everyone almost always taps out all mana (unless they have a removal/counterspell in hand), me included.

I should probably start avoiding going all-in like you do, to reduce both how I'm perceived by others and the resources I commit up until the boardwipe. I guess it can be a proper strategy, thanks!

mtg

Comment on

How do I have fun in Commander?

Reply in thread

You do have to like the commander and what it does (and the singleton and multiplayer format), but it sounds like you don't have the time to find out what that is, since yours get removed often and quickly. Getting obliterated is never fun, even when you love the format and the commander

If they have only high power decks, yeah you're better off trying to find a new-ish commander and proxy a whole deck around that. Keep in mind that usually older precons are pretty underpowered compared to newer cards. Still, since you sound new to EDH they could at least make an effort once and either borrow a precon or build something low power with the spare cards they have, if possible.

mtg

Comment on

How do I have fun in Commander?

Reply in thread

Honestly just consider proxying the cards; after having spent a bit too much on colored paper I'm realizing that buying actual cards is nothing more than cosmetic (if you only play with friends). That way you can try out ALL the cards you feel like trying, without wasting money.

You can either print the full card with this site (https://mtgprint.net/) or an ever more ink-saving version with this one (https://playtestproxies.com/).

Of course always keep in mind the power level of the decks used in your group and ask them if they're okay with it.

Regarding your OP, it sounds like your pod is playing at a level higher than precon; when we play precons only we see maybe two single-target removals and maaaybe one boardwipe, which is normal since stock precons have very little removal. Ask them to bring precons next time

mtg

Comment on

Do you fake falling behind in Commander to avoid getting focused on?

Reply in thread

You're right, very deck-dependent! One of us runs a heavily upgraded Pantlaza precon that's basically all creatures, and once they managed to win even after three board wipes even though they kept casting ALL creatures they could lol

So, yeah, I can see how overextending after you get to 7 devotion can leave you empty-handed when the wipe comes. Definitely something I'll keep in mind in future!

mtg

Comment on

Do you fake falling behind in Commander to avoid getting focused on?

Reply in thread

That's great haha very carefully managing how you look to others while actually assembling the pieces for your win is whay I was initially thinking about! But now I understand that in a casual setting I'd be better just playing, altough a bit smarter without going all-in at every turn, otherwise I'd be sitting there doing the bare minimum and watching others play. In a tournament is a great strategy, you're literally playing to win, in a casual group like mine winning is a good result but not the only objective

Comment on

Introducing Commander Brackets Beta

What do you more experienced players think of this? I'm kinda bad but this tiering doesn't really fit my decks, as it puts 9/10 into T1 and the tenth one above T2 but below T3 because it's got one "game changer" even though it's definitely not my best-performing deck