Try "camera" or "the first person" or "the viewer", works for me. Also, check if you have contradicting prompts, like "looking to the side/away" and then next line it's "looking at the camera".

could you provide a link to your generator at least? for select elements id should always be different. if you want to use the same list twice you just change the id. but actually seeing what you are talking about would be a start.

I'm pro new AI model because it generally tries to follow your description but I can agree that this insanity with lips contouring ruining it. I've tried negative and positive prompts with hundreds of "lip contouring", "lip surgery", "natural lips", "thin lips" etc, the same for brows. It's ugly in real life and it's ugly when AI tries to copy it, but unfortunately I couldn't get rid of it completely. The only hope is that it's still learning and we'll get the variety with time. And if someone found a solution, please make a post about it.

I asked this question before, and got a response that we can't access iframe elements. My work around was to use "relative" and "absolute" styles to position buttons on top of the generated images.

<input type="text" id="shownHere">
<select id="userChoosesHere" onchange="document.getElementById('shownHere').value=this.value;">

Something like this?

That's what CEO's of major AI companies like OpenAI say on youtube and x. All but one of them are optimistic about continuous learning AI's by mid 26, and the other guy says "within 5 years".

I don't have inside information on that, but I'll share my experience here. I think all of the authors are recognized, there's plenty of information on the web to find about them, but the new model lacks consistency (while it's training, or maybe it's the model's intrinsic feature of diversity?). If you ask flux to generate Eiichiro Oda, for example, and generate 3 images at once, one of them will remind Oda's style and the other two would be something you could see somewhere else.

try adding "unfocused eyes" to the negative prompt

It's not the model, I think. I tried it on my comfyUI, chroma v48, it barely ever gives me extra limbs. It could be the resolution. The model was trained in 1024x1024 format, and the options offered on perchance don't match. But to compensate for that perchance offers great image quality, the workflow (or loras) or whatever sampler/scheduler combinations... I've tried it all with the latest chroma and couldn't replicate it. It's amazing here on perchance.

They say, the model is Chroma, https://huggingface.co/lodestones/Chroma/tree/main. I have my doubts though. I've tried all kinds of sampler/scheduler combinations using XY Plot, nothing came close to the anime style in here. Somewhat similar was euler_ancestral + beta/normal. There could be a list of loras applied for anime styles, I'm not sure. I'd also like to know.

Yes, it's possible. The correct syntax would be [a = originalList.consumableList.selectMany(2)] . Then, we'll need to make a list of that slice by using createPerchanceTree() with the correct escape characters. The function works like this: [newList = createPerchanceTree("slicedList\n\ta\n\tb").slicedList] [newList]

Same. There's also a chance of pixilated screen, as though I set steps to high value.

That's my generator I was asking help for :)

Sure, camera brings even an anime image to life. Just a front picture everytime is boring. Try describing how a camera is looking at the characters or the scene and you'll notice the difference in the dynamics. A simple example, This picture tells a story rather than showing an anime character. And it's only 3 short sentence about the camera work, angle, focus.

Same prompts lead to the same results, give or take. The OP said FACES and EVERY TIME in caps, suggesting he's getting the same faces everytime he's using the i2t which is not true. I was just trying to point out that there are ways to describe many details and change that.

The best ones are installed locally. If you have ComfyUI or similar interface, you can install ForgeFlux Kontext. Which is the best and the latest model in the field of image-to-image, imho.

Nunchuks also has negative prompt, but Chroma seems to deal with fat ugly lip contouring a lot better it seems. My first impression.

It is achieved by the sum of all descriptions and the word choice. But one phrase/sentence is usually not enough. For example, you want a 2 inch fairy climbing, um, a bottle of water. The word "climb" suggests that the fairy is small enough. If you have frame/camera angle descriptions then you can add phrases like "the subject is taking one-third of the frame", to give it the perspective relative to the table surface. I suggest that you use https://huggingface.co/spaces/fancyfeast/joy-caption-beta-one. Find a picture in a search, then ask joy-caption to describe it in relative and superlative terms.

you can upscale images after generation, there are many AI plugins like that on the web. For example, https://www.aiease.ai/app/enhance-photo

The most amateur looking model is Flux.Krea. It's censored, though, in comparison with Chroma. Chroma Flash Heun is supposed to run with 10 steps Heun sampler. Try that. I've tried it and it's slightly different from Perchance. There's a model patch and loras from Perchance, I'm pretty sure, so you're unlikely to 100% replicate it.