Engagement bait. Just downvote and move on next time.

Recently I was listening in on a conversation and someone said "It was 15 years ago" and my reaction to that was "So not that long ago" 💀

Phew, good to know. I was beginning to think Superman isn't real.

Nah, fuck anyone normalising this shit.

Nah, that's not what they're talking about. Superman's vision is capable of penetrating concrete, but gets reliably stopped by lead. None of the particles here (or, I'm guessing, anywhere) have that property.

There's been a LOT of attempts to explain this throughout history, none of them are really airtight. Until one day I finally cracked it. Like seriously, I think I have a solution without a contradiction:

What if... God is just not very clever? He's doing his best, ok?

If he's really all powerful - I hear you object - couldn't he simply increase his intelligence? Yes. Yes he could. If he thought of it =(

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Again, a clue is only useful if you're looking for clue, and if you're looking for a clue, you already have the solution.

If you write "50% more placebo effect" on something, it will work better.

The scraper would have to know the image is scrabled to do that, and if they knew, they could just use the script.

Zlad!

Like a lion kills an antelope!
Like a hammer hits a cantaloupe!

AI will become self aware before Trump does.

Youtube is plenty shitty and getting worse, but at least it's still fairly easy to curate your feed.

Third panel

BOB

Obviously you want to test on the target hardware, but you don't exclusively test on it. You'll be using a PC build throughout the development, whether your target is playstation or a phone.

I'm not saying they don't have a console build at all, I'm saying the PC build existing is not at all surprising.

You can tell he's telling you something. That's enough for me.

Yeah, no shit. You think they're using consoles every time they need to test the game during developement?