Spyke

Replies

firefox

Comment on

If people have to hack your privacy-respecting browser to make it respect their privacy, maybe your privacy-respecting browser isn’t really privacy respecting.

@[email protected] At least it's just about:config, it doesn't require you to download the source code, apply patches might might break in the next version, then compile again.

Firefox is bad at the moment and people should be aware that privacy focused forks exist, but developers maintaining Chromium forks are having a worse time. Times are hard for those seeking privacy. :btr_bocchi_pain:

jpegxl

Comment on

*Permanently Deleted*

@that_leaflet I agree with the commenters there: it's weird. I once researched image formats for a website of mine and JPEG XL showed better results in compression. It was slower (as I had to use a WASM-based decoder for browsers which not implement it), but I expected it to improve with time as long browsers implement it. But I can be biased: I used up to 1080p anime images. Also, I wanted progressive loading, which, at that time, AVIF didn't supported.

Which makes me ponder: since AVIF now supports progressive loading, I guess I can use it in my website and avoid the WASM decoder. :ThinkCatgirl:

usa

Comment on

Americans have no idea

@JeSuisUnHombre Reminds me when talking with someone about their dream to visit Disney: "no way, unless you are talking about Disney Paris or Tokyo". To be fair, I guess both are still bad choices as those still means supporting the USA and it's current administration, so next time I should recommend a theme park from a non-USA based company.

You reached the end