Comment on
Coney Island Parachute Jump (Ride 1939-1964, card date unknown)
Reply in thread
In the postcard, it looks a little like a colossal jellyfish, with the lit up parachutes. That is sort of eerie!
Comment on
Coney Island Parachute Jump (Ride 1939-1964, card date unknown)
Reply in thread
In the postcard, it looks a little like a colossal jellyfish, with the lit up parachutes. That is sort of eerie!
Comment on
Coney Island Parachute Jump (Ride 1939-1964, card date unknown)
Reply in thread
Yes, but the ride is not. Hence, it (the parachute ride) was...
I included recent photos of the structure, and info about modern lighting, so I know the tower structure is still there!
Comment on
McDonalds. No tipping, no need to dress up. (1964-ish)
Reply in thread
Good detective work! I'll update.
Comment on
McDonalds. No tipping, no need to dress up. (1964-ish)
Reply in thread
I wonder how the ratio of McD's wage, to burger price, compares to today.
I have no idea how much they paid back then.
Comment on
Log sawing device, easy and fast (1880)
Reply in thread
For sure. It seems like a solid idea. Well not the tophat part, but the rest. Much better than just your arms.
I never knew of them either. But I don't know if that's because they never caught on, or because I don't know shit about 1800's lumberjacking. I wonder if maybe steam power destroyed the market for these. But feels like it could've had a niche. A water or steam powered sawmill beats it, but you have to get the logs there. You could set up one of these on-prem to segment logs too big to easily move to a mill. But I'm speculating. Maybe it was too narrow a niche, or came too late, to find a market?
Comment on
McDonalds. No tipping, no need to dress up. (1964-ish)
Reply in thread
Good spot, I didn't even notice the logo line!
The little building off to the side, in the photo above, is a mini McD's museum that the company built. Seems like this store wasn't financially worth keeping open, but restored it for history reasons.
With low sales, damage from the 1994 Northridge earthquake, and the lack of a drive-up window and indoor seating, the restaurant was closed, and McDonald's planned to demolish it and incorporate some of its features in a modern "retro" restaurant nearby. ..... With both the public and preservationists demanding the restaurant be saved, McDonald's spent two years restoring the restaurant and reopened it. The restaurant now features an adjacent museum and gift shop housed in a replica of the original McDonald's location in San Bernardino.
Comment on
It just doesn't seem like a very good idea. (1969)
I want to know how that photoshoot went down.
"Hey, Yolanda, we'll give you a thousand bucks if you let some guy who couldn't make it in Hollywood blow smoke in your face from a few inches away. But you have to pretend you like it."
Comment on
Flying, swimming, watertight, nuclear powered family sedans (1954)
Reply in thread
Haha yeah. I get where they were coming from though. The 1st half the century saw an incredible explosion of scientific and technological progress. Intercontinental airplane flights instead of weeks on a ship. Electrification of homes. Television broadcasts. Eradication of entire terrible diseases. Massive progress on so many fronts.
It seems natural to think the same rate of progress will continue. So... sure, maybe another decade before we get cars that both have radar and fly and float? And that's a thing we could have done by 1964, on a one-off highly impractical basis. It just couldn't be economic or practical at scale.
Comment on
Flying, swimming, watertight, nuclear powered family sedans (1954)
Reply in thread
Instead, we got flatscreens replacing tactile knobs, and logging of our GPS locations for sale to the highest bidder.
The retro-future was better than the actual one we got!
Comment on
It just doesn't seem like a very good idea. (1969)
Reply in thread
is code for you wanna do it right now
Different times I guess. Hard for me to imagine anything less sexy than getting, or for that matter giving, a snoot full of cigarette smoke at close range.
Maybe it's something that makes sense if you're a smoker?
Comment on
It just doesn't seem like a very good idea. (1969)
Reply in thread
Haha yeah that got me too. "Might be 4 plus a half cigarette remainder. Might be 5 and 2/3. But around 5 somewhere, we are pretty sure."
Comment on
Flying, swimming, watertight, nuclear powered family sedans (1954)
Reply in thread
Sinus nanobots
I do not want to be the first human test subject for the sinus nanobots.
Comment on
It just doesn't seem like a very good idea. (1969)
Reply in thread
Haha yeah I thought just after I hit post, she probably got WAY less than $1000. Even inflation adjusted, probably still not.
Comment on
Kodak Girl (lots! 1910's - 1930's)
Reply in thread
Range of sources, I didn't save every URL but here's one from the Univ of Toronto,
https://library.torontomu.ca/asc/files/2013/10/DSC_0329.jpg
Main image in the post from,
https://www.publicdomainpictures.net/pictures/310000/velka/kodak-camera-vintage-poster.jpg
Also I didn't know it at the time I made the post, but there's a whole wikipedia page about the Kodak Girl. I'm off to read it now! It has a few other examples.
Comment on
It just doesn't seem like a very good idea. (1969)
Reply in thread
The past is stranger than I am even capable of imagining.
The decline of this practice and the recognition of the harmful effects of tobacco led to the figure of speech "blowing smoke up one's ass", which means lying to someone to flatter them.
TIL.
Comment on
Kodak Girl (lots! 1910's - 1930's)
Reply in thread
You are welcome. I also found this, after I made the main post. Kodak Girl has got a pretty comprehensive wikipedia page -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodak_Girl
Lots of talk about the cultural impacts, even the impact it had on real life fashion where her striped dress style was in for a while.
Comment on
Grow big and strong with corn syrup (1952, + bonus 1917 wartime ad)
Just noticed in the 1917 ad, the Karo Lady is literally an anthropomorphized ear of corn. And not shy about showing off her rows of shapely kernels, haha!
Frankly I don't want anthropomorphized food. Feels too close to cannibalism!
Comment on
For all the Casablanca fans in all the gin joints in the world (1982)
Reply in thread
Ah, I wonder if it was this guy! --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Sacchi
Comment on
For all the Casablanca fans in all the gin joints in the world (1982)
Reply in thread
Haha yeah the Bogie guy would totally fool me from the side view! It's the 2nd ad where you see him from the front, where I can tell it's not actually Bogie.
I agree about the Ingrid lookalike. She's pretty, but not really a ringer for Ingrid. Ingrid had a unique look, and might be very hard to find a lookalike.
Comment on
Better than whiskey for the flu. (1928)
Reply in thread
Yeah... I wonder if it might've said on the back of the bottle? I don't see it on the front or the ad.
The reason I wonder about the back is, this was 1920's, and in the USA, the legal requirement to disclose the ingredients of medicines was passed in 1906 under Teddy Roosevelt. Teddy was all about pure food and drugs.
Normally I think of the 1800's or early 19-aughts as the era when ingredients were a total mystery.