I spent a month specifically on this problem, doing all the research I could about NLG, pipeline output, negative instructions causing priming, etc. Not when I got home "a month," compiling while I'm at my 10 hour shift a day a month. The answer is no. The system bypasses all instructions for raw output, the best you can do is tell it to recreate it again without using what was said, thus priming the system to do it again because it can't retain the memory of it being relevant in the raw output.