Sources :
Websites taken down worldwide as critical cyber-security update issued https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cmly0lg3w5x2o
excerpt : "The flaws were discovered by AI, with cyber-security firm Wiz saying they were the "most severe vulnerabilities ever discovered" by the tech, which is reshaping the cyber landscape."

Global response coordination as agents uncover critical vulnerabilities https://openai.com/index/coordinated-disclosure-of-critical-vulnerabilities/

My observation :
Lemmy is sometimes an echo chamber and has a blind spot whenever a.i. achievements are concerned.

(They probably also have a smaller percentage of MAGAts.)

this was posted in community :
"no stupid questions"
by :
(...)

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52549371

The post question was “How is the phrase, ‘it’s my money and I should be allowed to be stupid with it’ any different from the phrase, ‘let people enjoy things’? And why is the former more accepted than the latter when they’re both just as stupid, toxic, destructive, and damaging to our society?”

Anyone who calls this a “troll question” admits to being the actual troll, here.

Edit

• @BlameTheAntifa has admitted to being the troll here and not me. Anyone who callls me a troll admits to being the actual troll.

i have been studying cosmology from this source :

https://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_02.htm
... and have a problem with this part :
(( dynamics ... ))

With a constant mass interior to D(t) producing the acceleration of the edge (...)

The problem i have is they describe the situation as symmetric from the center of a sphere and try to apply this symmetry to the edge of the sphere while, since galaxies are escaping at relativistic velocities, the situation at the edge cannot be described as symmetric in the way that would imply that :

The gravitational effect of the external matter vanishes (...)

Is Dark Energy Getting Weaker? New Evidence Strengthens the Case. https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-dark-energy-getting-weaker-new-evidence-strengthens-the-case-20250319/

Last spring, a team of nearly 1,000 cosmologists announced that dark energy — the enigmatic agent propelling the universe to swell in size at an ever-increasing rate — might be slackening.
(...)
Combining that data with state-of-the-art observations of the cosmic microwave background, they found a tension with Lambda-CDM of 3.2 sigma that disappears when dark energy is presumed to change.
(...)
Varying dark energy would vastly expand the range of possibilities for where the universe is headed. The expansion might grind to a halt, and gravity could bring everything crashing together. Or dark energy could go phantom again, and the expanding universe could even pick up more speed. Everything depends on the details of what’s generating this energy.

Original article, 2003 Nov 13 :

Expanding Confusion : common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the universe
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808 ::: spoiler i found it at :
.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-can-the-observable-universe-be-a-closed-system.999115/ :::

Since we are born we all have to make our own cosmological theories. Starting when we are babies, we have to figure out who mama and papa are and what the hell does those baby toys do exactly.

As we get older many of us will reconstruct Einstein's theories by ourselves to try to prove them wrong. Failing at this, we come to admit that general relativity is coherent with physics, its experimental results and our own limited logic.

At this point, we are on a mission to rewrite black hole physics and modify stupid cosmological theories.

This is where we are right now.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27501113

Original article title :
Ukraine Violates Partial Truce by Attacking Russian Gas Station - teleSUR English https://www.telesurenglish.net/ukraine-violates-partial-truce-by-attacking-russian-gas-station/?noamp=available

This post was first created by :
@[email protected]
... who is a self declared pro-russian.
... who might be a russian sympathizer giving this post and their post's history.
russian propagandist masquerading as neutral

The article is misleading since it hides that russia breach the ceasefire in the first place. So, this is merely a legitimate response from Ukraine to that breach.

Kremlin spokesperson Peskov asserted that Ukrainian attempts to attack energy facilities are a daily occurrence.

On Friday, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that Ukrainian forces attacked the gas metering station in Sudzha.

🥀🌞🍓🐣😁👍

What is "Toastify is awesome”?
https://lemmy.world/post/17198003/10978272

... to fix the problem i simply logged out and logged in again

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/31065781

url :
https://merics.org/en/comment/new-german-strategy-toward-china

Explanation of what i am doing here :
another user :
@[email protected]
posted using the above URL and that user got a huge wall of text ...

After testing the only way I found to remove the wall of text was to remove the URL of the URL field and place it in the header.

::: spoiler Selected excerpts:
Archived

This is an opinionated piece by Mikko Huotari, executive director at Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), a European Think tank.

[…]

While German exports in particular are falling rapidly, European business groups are complaining about continuing and new difficulties in securing a fair footing in the Chinese market. In many cases, there has been a role reversal: These days, companies are not only seeking salvation in China’s market size and favorable investment conditions but have also become dependent partners profiting from the globalization and innovation of Chinese players.

[…]

Europe’s security and resilience are at stake …] Russia’s escalation in the Ukraine war has been accompanied by increasing Chinese support for Moscow—including through deliveries of drones. Chinese espionage against German companies has become an underestimated part of everyday life and is on the rise. Cyberattacks on the Federal Agency for Cartography or the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party headquarters, for example, have been attributed to China.

The hybrid threat to Europe is becoming increasingly serious, while simmering tensions in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea mark geopolitical fault lines. Beijing is using authoritarian partnerships and pragmatic parallel structures to open up new international spheres, pushing into gaps in the political order that the US no longer wants to fill and that are beyond the EU’s reach.

The outcome of this foreboding weather system won’t just shape the future of European competitiveness and security but will also determine whether Germany’s green and digital transformation will succeed—and whether democratic societies will remain resilient. The old scenario outlined by Germany’s China strategy isn’t obsolete yet, but the urgency to act has increased immensely.

[…]

There is a clear focus on risk and systemic conflict with the emphasis on the axis of autocracies between China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. A National Security Council could provide a framework for resolving departmental conflicts of interest and internally updating guidelines on dealing with China. In addition, the Weimar Triangle—i.e., closer cooperation between Berlin, Paris, and Warsaw—is to be revived as a new source of strength for a united European policy.

[…]

Anyone who still hopes for Beijing’s support for European security interests against Moscow, or who regards China as a reliable stabilizing factor in global trade or is counting on political change, is deluding themselves.

[…]

If parts of German industry see the future of the automotive and green energy sectors primarily in China or with Chinese investment in Europe, or if dependencies on raw materials are so strong that they can only be scaled back slowly, the macroeconomic risks must be soberly analyzed and clearly stated. More German trade and investment with China can still be in Europe’s interest—but only under certain conditions.

[…]

In the next legislative period, the KRITIS Umbrella Act, can finally be passed to improve the protection of critical infrastructures. In “outbound investments” in highly sensitive sectors, a European inspection framework should be designed in such a way that it closes gaps in export controls and also provides guidance for German companies. Clear and regular attribution of verifiable Chinese cyberattacks and information campaigns should be part of a standard repertoire to heighten business and public awareness of the forms of hybrid conflict. Cooperation between the security authorities of like-minded states must be intensified, while investment in broad-based expertise on China will remain necessary.

[…]

As a possible response to autocratic cooperation worldwide, the new German government could therefore strive to broaden the G7 mechanism into a G11, thereby strengthening Europe’s effectiveness vis-à-vis China and embedding that approach in transatlantic cooperation. It would be in Germany’s and Europe’s interest to include Australia, India, and South Korea, and to give the European Union its own seat to do justice to the pressing realities of security and economic policy—including its policy toward China. Such a structure would reflect the fact that Europe and the Indo Pacific are increasingly closely linked through supply chains, investment flows, and security policy concerns. India as an emerging economic power and South Korea with its cutting-edge technology could, together with Australia, considerably broaden the horizon and resonance of Europe’s China policy.

[…]
.
::: .
::: spoiler Wall of text here :
A new German strategy toward Chinamerics.org Berlin faces mounting challenges in its dealings with China. It’s time for a change in approach, says Mikko Huotari. The policy toward Beijing must become more European.When a new German government takes the helm in a few weeks, the context for Germany's China policy will have changed significantly. Even back in 2023, the China strategy drafted by the Germany’s foreign office was described by some insiders as a “dark clouds” paper. Since then, however, multiple storm fronts have been converging to pose a massive challenge to Germany’s effectiveness in its relations with China.The first such front is looming over economic relations. The former model of complementary trade links between Germany and China has long been obsolete. The new normal involves displacement in key industries, fierce competition in external markets, and ever more evident damage—a “China shock 2.0”—to the European single market through systematic market distortions and surplus capacities resulting from Chinese output.While German exports in particular are falling rapidly, European business groups are complaining about continuing and new difficulties in securing a fair footing in the Chinese market. In many cases, there has been a role reversal: These days, companies are not only seeking salvation in China’s market size and favorable investment conditions but have also become dependent partners profiting from the globalization and innovation of Chinese players.The second front is equally challenging—the world’s growing technological divide. New US regulations on high-performance chips used in artificial intelligence (AI) are creating a whole new global power architecture. The Chinese race to catch up on chips and AI—illustrated most recently by OpenAI competitor DeepSeek—will accelerate the drifting apart of global technology ecosystems. US regulations, Chinese attitudes, and concrete countermeasures from Beijing are driving the decoupling. Germany and Europe are falling behind in key technology fields and becoming trapped in the middle.Europe’s security and resilience are at stake under the third storm front. Russia's escalation in the Ukraine war has been accompanied by increasing Chinese support for Moscow—including through deliveries of drones. Chinese espionage against German companies has become an underestimated part of everyday life and is on the rise. Cyberattacks on the Federal Agency for Cartography or the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party headquarters, for example, have been attributed to China.The hybrid threat to Europe is becoming increasingly serious, while simmering tensions in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea mark geopolitical fault lines. Beijing is using authoritarian partnerships and pragmatic parallel structures to open up new international spheres, pushing into gaps in the political order that the US no longer wants to fill and that are beyond the EU’s reach.The outcome of this foreboding weather system won’t just shape the future of European competitiveness and security but will also determine whether Germany’s green and digital transformation will succeed—and whether democratic societies will remain resilient. The old scenario outlined by Germany’s China strategy isn’t obsolete yet, but the urgency to act has increased immensely. Writing another fundamental policy paper on China wouldn’t help anyone. So where should the momentum come from?Focus on systemic conflictIn the brief election campaign of early 2025, CDU leader Friedrich Merz has outlined a new foreign policy strategy, which would also have to involve a change in approach toward China.There is a clear focus on risk and systemic conflict with the emphasis on the axis of autocracies between China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. A National Security Council could provide a framework for resolving departmental conflicts of interest and internally updating guidelines on dealing with China. In addition, the Weimar Triangle—i.e., closer cooperation between Berlin, Paris, and Warsaw—is to be revived as a new source of strength for a united European policy.However, the acid test for such a theoretical approach is already imminent. How will the next German government calibrate its concrete China policy while it deals with massive external pressure from the second Trump administration and many industry leaders are privately pushing for a better relationship with China?The pendulum mustn’t just swing back: In the current environment, deeper relations with China will no longer expand Germany's strategic room for maneuver. There must be no geopolitical vacillation here.Anyone who still hopes for Beijing’s support for European security interests against Moscow, or who regards China as a reliable stabilizing factor in global trade or is counting on political change, is deluding themselves. To be sure, the dismantling of the global post-war order by the Trump administration isn’t in Germany's interest either. However, the continuing potential for convergence, overlapping strategic interests, and security policy realities should forbid Berlin from flirting with mercantilist equidistance.If parts of German industry see the future of the automotive and green energy sectors primarily in China or with Chinese investment in Europe, or if dependencies on raw materials are so strong that they can only be scaled back slowly, the macroeconomic risks must be soberly analyzed and clearly stated. More German trade and investment with China can still be in Europe’s interest—but only under certain conditions.“Homework policy”Germany’s China policy therefore remains first and foremost one of getting its homework done. Together with the EU, it must reposition itself structurally. This is the only way to ensure Europe’s long-term relevance in global value chains and its geopolitical independence, and to re-secure its viability as an industrial location as well as its own capacity for innovation in competition and in tough disputes with China.Pursuing a more effective integrated approach toward economic security and foreign trade policy will be hard work. The silos within government are entrenched—successful strategic coordination with the private sector is limited at present. In this phase of globalization, Germany in particular needs to explore new avenues internally.The Bundestag should require the government to conduct a regular “resilience audit”—or the government should develop benchmarks at the European level for reducing dependencies, including on China. At the same time, exchange and cooperation between EU member states should be intensified. In the next legislative period, the KRITIS Umbrella Act, can finally be passed to improve the protection of critical infrastructures. In “outbound investments” in highly sensitive sectors, a European inspection framework should be designed in such a way that it closes gaps in export controls and also provides guidance for German companies. Clear and regular attribution of verifiable Chinese cyberattacks and information campaigns should be part of a standard repertoire to heighten business and public awareness of the forms of hybrid conflict. Cooperation between the security authorities of like-minded states must be intensified, while investment in broad-based expertise on China will remain necessary.The outgoing German government of Chancellor Olaf Scholz did not live up to its ambition to act in a more European way. Many in Germany remain blind to the fact that the German business model of maximum globalization may have helped to establish Europe's strength, but today—especially in relation to China and the US—it entails vulnerability and thereby responsibility for the whole of Europe. National and European coordination on policy toward China is still treated as secondary at best, apart from in very limited circles. The new government must first prove that it will not only handle this differently, but also invest in initiatives, structures, and capacities that make Brussels more effective.From G7 to G11As a possible response to autocratic cooperation worldwide, the new German government could therefore strive to broaden the G7 mechanism into a G11, thereby strengthening Europe’s effectiveness vis-à-vis China and embedding that approach in transatlantic cooperation. It would be in Germany’s and Europe's interest to include Australia, India, and South Korea, and to give the European Union its own seat to do justice to the pressing realities of security and economic policy—including its policy toward China. Such a structure would reflect the fact that Europe and the Indo Pacific are increasingly closely linked through supply chains, investment flows, and security policy concerns. India as an emerging economic power and South Korea with its cutting-edge technology could, together with Australia, considerably broaden the horizon and resonance of Europe’s China policy.There will be resistance to such an expansion of the G7 format: Washington might see it as a dilution of American power. Yet US President Donald Trump already proposed a G11 in 2020 —albeit one that included Russia. India is pursuing a complex “multi-alignment” foreign policy and won’t be easy to integrate. Seoul is delicately navigating a tense relationship with China, and few players are interested in the EU gaining power. Nevertheless, a G11 could maintain and increase effectiveness in competition and conflict with China—be it in securing access to critical raw materials or in technology initiatives.The new German government faces the task of reshaping Germany’s China policy at a time of profound global upheaval. Despite all its own internal weaknesses: China is becoming an even greater systemic challenge. The existing structures and approaches aren’t enough. A resolute realignment is required. Only through close, strategic cooperation within the EU and with partners worldwide can German interests in relations with China be safeguarded over the long term.This article was first published by Internationale Politik Quarterly on March 3, 2025. :::

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26152027

ContactKeys
::: spoiler PlayStore Review :
This app installed without my permission. There is barely any info about what this app is for. I have all my settings turned off so it asks my permission before downloading anything, and this app still manage to get installed without consent. This is a very shady thing to do. This and another 2 apps also from google (e.g. SafetyCore) that just installed without permission. If my settings mean nothing, this is very worrying. No heads up, nothing.
:::
135 people found this review helpful
.
Released on : 2025 Jan 28
Downloads : 1,000,000,000+
... is it a tool for Google to replace or control encryption keys used in applications ?

Google’s ‘Secret’ Update Scans All Your Photos
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2025/02/26/google-starts-scanning-your-photos-without-any-warning/
from post :
https://lemmy.world/comment/15360201

::: spoiler also in the Forbes article :
Per one tech forum (
https://gbatemp.net/threads/psa-to-all-android-users-google-quietly-installs-spyware-on-android-devices.667542/

GBAtemp.net - The Independent Video Game Community
)
this week: “Google has quietly installed an app on all Android devices called ‘Android System SafetyCore’. It claims to be a ‘security’ application, but whilst running in the background, it collects call logs, contacts, location, your microphone, and much more making this application ‘spyware’ and a HUGE privacy concern. It is strongly advised to uninstall this program if you can. ::: ... →
Remove the following 2 spywares :
1).
Android System SafetyCore : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.safetycore
2).
Android System Key Verifier : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.contactkeys

Prevent installation of 1) SafetyCore :

@[email protected]
https://lemmy.world/comment/15345614
:
https://github.com/daboynb/Safetycore-placeholder/releases/download/v2.0/Safetycore-placeholder.apk
.

https://archive.is/FAhos

Link to archive.is due to paywall: https://archive.is/FAhos#selection-4751.0-4751.202

Cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25915587
Originally from :
@[email protected]
deleted from :
[email protected]
modlog : reason: Internal US News

Copy suggested title: Trump Fires Joint Chiefs Chairman Amid Flurry of Dismissals at Pentagon

President Trump fired the country’s senior military officer as part of an extraordinary Friday night purge at the Pentagon that injected politics into the selection of the nation’s top military leaders.

In all, six Pentagon officials were fired, including Adm. Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead the Navy; Gen. James Slife, the vice chief of the Air Force; and the top lawyers for the Army, Navy and Air Force.

Original source: NYT (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/21/us/politics/trump-fires-cq-brown-pentagon.html).

Remember, Hitler did it in 53 days.

originally posted by :
@[email protected]

in community :
[email protected]
.
cross-posted from:
https://lemmy.world/post/25880650
.
https://fedia.io/m/[email protected]/t/1827324
.

The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances comprises three substantially identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary, on 5 December 1994, to provide security assurances by its signatories relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The three memoranda were originally signed by three nuclear powers: Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. The memoranda, signed in Patria Hall at the Budapest Convention Center with U.S. Ambassador Donald M. Blinken amongst others in attendance, prohibited Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations."...

Maybe this archiving is unnecessary since there is another copy here :
https://lemmy.world/post/25789855

Archived post ... since it will be obviously deleted :
https://lemmy.world/post/25790101
it's not following rules in the [email protected] community ...

Original poster (author) :
Operation LuigiX :
@[email protected]

Original title :
How Elon died - - A short story about Operation LuigiX

URL :

cross-posted from: https://mastodon.social/users/l1x/statuses/114031343439930759

How Elon died - A short story about Operation LuigiX

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/bafybeia2edzjw7gainntqtz2ltbm5xedy42m5ibbhdggsbim2vlsvky23e/luigix.html

@politics

from :
@[email protected]

::: spoiler Original title
Would you accept it if someone said to you that they would destroy your child but give you a brand new luxury car in return? :::
::: spoiler verry long post header
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25610998

There is a direct strong correlation between being religious and not accepting the modern lifestyle and birth rates. While more conservative countries have higher birth rates, in modern countries with lower birth rates, religious people who try to preserve their traditional values ​​have much higher birth rates.

For example, a study in Austria found that Christians have twice as many children as non-religious people.

https://www.oeaw.ac.at/…s-people-have-more-children Similarly, in the US, there is a direct correlation between the frequency of church attendance and the number of children.

https://ifstudies.org/…ous-secular-fertility-divide

In almost every country, the ratio of children per woman is above 2.1 in groups that try to preserve their traditional lifestyle.

This is not surprising because if you examine how the role of women in modern society has been designed throughout history, you will understand how reproduction has been undermined.

If you scientifically examine the female human, that is, women, like other social mammal species in nature, you can easily see that women have evolved to start giving birth to children at the age of 16, give birth to nearly 10 children throughout their lives, and feed, breastfeed and educate these children for a long time.

Traditional societies have given women a similar role in society. If you examine even pre-Christian societies, you will see the same truth in ancient Greeks, Romans, Persians, Chinese, even Aztecs and Native Americans. Likewise, the situation is similar in hunter-gatherer societies. Women marry at a young age. They usually have more than two children. The most important duty in society is motherhood. Their duty after motherhood is to contribute economically to their own society. The most valuable woman in society is the woman who has given birth to and raised the best children.

Modern society, on the other hand, is a society designed for a small minority of super-rich people to become even richer. The super-rich not only own the media that directs societies, the written and visual press, but also have the most political power and influence the governments the most. The vast majority of services provided by states to societies, including the national education system, have been manipulated by the super-rich.

When women have too many children in a society, a problem of resource sharing automatically arises. When a woman has more than 3 children, she cannot work outside; she must look after the children at home. In this case, the man, as the only worker, cannot look after the entire family. If there are 6 children, 1 person must feed 8 people.

It is a fact that a man who cannot provide enough food to feed his own children is more demanding and aggressive. In addition, while the man is in his 40s, his sons have become adults and can support their fathers in their struggle for bread. Those young men can also be seriously demanding and aggressive. When you examine the struggle between workers and employers during the industrialization period, you will see that the owners of capital could not fight the rapidly reproducing working class. Those men fought with their lives and blood to protect their jobs and for better wages.

This war is very serious. This is the basic method of providing income justice in nature. Those who are hungry attack those who have much more than they can consume and take the resources from them.

Destroying the surplus population is the main priority for the rich. If they cannot destroy that population, that crowd will not allow them to take their wealth and remain as a super rich minority. For the super rich, reducing the population is an existential problem.

The rich in the West have eased the problem by sending these men to the continents they had just started to colonize, America, Australia and Africa. Especially after World War II, when this problem could no longer be solved by migrating from Europe, they solved the problem by killing several birds with one stone. Birth control methods have been very helpful to them.

The solution is also obvious. When a woman marries young, she has many children early and cannot leave the house. The man she marries has to take care of the woman and the children. If a woman does not marry and have children, she will have to work because she will not have an income. Since there will be no children, everyone will support themselves with their own salary. Therefore, even if the salary is seriously reduced, people will not complain. It is also known that men and women who live alone are much more obedient than women and men who live in large families and that they follow the instructions given by the rich. The ideal society for the super rich is a society without families or children. In this society, they can make very high profits by paying very low wages, and no one can harm their power. Modern society is built on this understanding.

Reproduction is the basis of life. Non-reproductive species and societies are doomed to extinction. Modern societies are also social structures doomed to extinction. The beginning of the extinction of modern society and its discomfort to the wealthy segments began in Europe in the 1970s. There was a serious shortage of working people in Europe, salaries began to increase rapidly and company profitability began to decrease. Normally, the solution to this problem of the number of people should be to try to increase birth rates, but the rich found the solution in accepting immigrants. It is known that people with similar genetic structures and cultures can organize more easily, form a power and rebel. Multicultural structures are more fragile, much harder to rebel and are more obedient societies.

Continuing to accept immigrants is vital for the continuation of modern societies. When these societies stop accepting immigrants, they will inevitably experience economic problems. Salaries will increase greatly and people will not be found to employ them. As a result, the super rich cannot increase their wealth any further.

Low birth rates and high immigration are vital dangers to the health and security of the nation and states. Normally, a society abandons policies that lead to its destruction, but the rich continue because they profit more from this destruction process and are in power. At the end of this process, the super rich continue with these policies even if they cause the destruction of the nation and states. The rich do not have a state or nation, they have money and wealth.

Frankly, the rich's aim to get rich at all costs as if there is no tomorrow and the fact that the same rich can determine state policies with the power they have leaves this problem unsolved. All modern societies will disappear step by step. They will continue to destroy the societies that resist modernization in the world by modernizing them. Of course, this situation will not last forever. Before the human race completely disappears, it can develop an alternative society to modern society and continue to reproduce again. But this is a long time from happening. I probably cannot see it.

If it could be solved, how would the birth rate be increased? In fact, what I will write will be the version of what has been done in traditional societies for thousands of years, adapted to developing technology.

The education and upbringing of girls and boys will be separated. The education of girls in particular will be accelerated and should be largely completed before the age of 16. In the education system, girls should be given training on childbearing and raising children. Thus, when they reach the age of childbearing, they should have the knowledge and self-confidence to give birth and raise children. In all channels that guide society, such as television, cinema, newspapers, social media, books and the like, women who have given birth to and raised many children should be role models. For example, series should be shot that tell how happy, peaceful and valuable a woman who has given birth to and raised 6 children is. It should be told how unhappy women without children are and how they spend their lives in vain. The laws should privilege women not because they are women, but because they are mothers. The laws and social security structures should protect women who are mothers, especially if they have many children. A woman should know that the more healthy children she gives birth to and raises, the more support she will receive from the society and the state. These may seem like very radical views. But look at it this way: What is the most valuable thing in your life? Would you accept it if someone said to you that they would destroy your child but give you a brand new luxury car in return? or when they say we will give you a 100 thousand TL raise but we will kill all your children, would you accept it?

What is the material value of your child?

When you realize that your most valuable asset for you and even for society is your children, when you realize how much of your life you spend on your meaningless, valueless job, you will understand what I mean.
:::

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25500890

https://bturtel.substack.com/p/human-all-too-human
For AI to learn something fundamentally new - something it cannot be taught by humans - it requires exploration and ground-truth feedback.

https://www.lightningrod.ai/
We’re enabling self-play that learns directly from real world feedback.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25332261

i cannot add more blocked users so i went one by one through that list ... starting from the first one i blocked. Not surprisingly, looking at each account, they are either Banned or have No Activity Since ~1 year.

Eventually there could be some site maintenance for [ Banned + Empty ] accounts so to clean our block lists accordingly ...

Some other optimization of this type could be made ... i believe it would free the server from useless work since the server have to compute removing according to Long Block Lists ... this task could be heavy in server work ...

What do you think ?

Historically, only when the army is on the side of the people does tyrannic nightmares end well.
Since they pledge to serve the People and uphold the Constitution, will the People secure the army on their side ?

Where to post this ... ?
[email protected]
that community has no rules // barriers
but, it has almost no subscribers.

How to improve this question // topic ?

is it well known and do people talk about it ... like in the mainstream media ?

[caution]
:::spoiler source
https://bsky.app/profile/ecmclaughlin.bsky.social
(see comment below by @[email protected] ) :::

Listen,
for folks who don’t know, I was a part of a small organizing team that led to a mass mobilization in 813 cities worldwide in 2019.

I am not talking out of my ass.

You should be VERY VERY VERY careful in this environment about sharing flyers for events that identify NO organizer

[solved] by : @[email protected]

• interface to reddit community: https://redlib.northboot.xyz/r/50501/
• spreadsheet with info on this and other protests: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-rraq_sRU6n-rvGj45AxscxouGVcH03efhMQHJYzc6w/edit?gid=900690167#gid=900690167

::: spoiler Click to show start times

Start times:

Start Times By State (current as of 1/31/2025):

Alabama: No information

Alaska: 12:00 noon

Arizona: 12:00 noon

Arkansas: 12:00 noon

California: 12:00 noon

Colorado: 12:00 noon

Connecticut: 12:00 noon

Delaware: 12:00 noon

Florida: 12:00 noon

Georgia: 11:00 AM

Hawaii: 12:00 noon

Idaho: 12:00 noon

Illinois: 12:00 noon

Indiana: 12:00 noon

Iowa: 12:00 noon

Kansas: 12:00 noon

Kentucky: 12:00 noon

Louisiana: 12:00 noon

Maine: 12:00 noon

Maryland: 12:00 noon

Massachusetts: 12:00 noon

Michigan: 12:00 noon

Minnesota: 12:00 noon

Mississippi: 12:00 noon

Missouri: 12:00 noon

Montana: 12:00 noon

Nebraska: 12:00 noon

Nevada: 12:00 noon

New Hampshire: 12:00 noon

New Jersey: 12:00 noon

New Mexico: 12:00 noon

New York: 12:00 noon

North Carolina: 1:00 PM

North Dakota: 12:00 noon

Ohio: 12:00 noon

Oklahoma: 12:00 noon - 4:00 PM

Oregon: 12:00 noon

Pennsylvania: 12:00 noon

Rhode Island: 12:00 noon

South Carolina: 12:00 noon

South Dakota: 12:00 noon

Tennessee: 1:30

Texas: 11:00 AM - 4:00 PM

Utah: 12:00 noon

Vermont: 12:00 noon

Virginia: 11:30 AM

Washington: 12:00 noon - 2PM

Washington DC: 12:00 noon

West Viriginia: 12:00 noon

Wisconsin: 12:00 noon

Wyoming: 12:00 noon

https://redlib.northboot.xyz/r/50501/comments/1ifb26m/start_times/

:::

Original author:
@[email protected]

delete from :
[email protected]

Title :
This is not NEWS, this is US news

URL (Picture) :
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/76192dd4-c9b6-48b4-adbb-18add0ab07eb.jpeg?format=webp

Body :
Overflow of US newz here. Anywhere I can get global news that actually have an impact on the world? Not just: Arizona kid was not picked from school kinda news?

Comments :

from : @[email protected]
![email protected]

from me : @[email protected]
(( i was warning O.P. of imminent possible deletion. and yes, the post was deleted ))