• SEC

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/36591083

Rudy Giuliani has reached a settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in its $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit over his baseless 2020 election-rigging claims.

The two sides said in a filing in federal court in Washington, DC, on Friday that they have agreed to permanently dismiss the suit against the former New York City mayor and former personal lawyer to President Donald Trump.

The brief filing doesn’t cite the settlement terms. Spokespeople for Giuliani and the Colorado-based company said Saturday that the terms are confidential and declined to comment further.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34654514

Settlement came as case was headed to trial for jury to consider if conservative outlet was liable for damages

The conservative outlet Newsmax has agreed to pay $67m to Dominion Voting Systems to settle a defamation lawsuit over lies about voting in the 2020 election.

The settlement came as the case was headed to trial. Earlier this year, Delaware superior court judge Eric Davis ruled that Newsmax had defamed the voting technology company by broadcasting false claims about its equipment after the 2020 election. A jury would have considered whether Newsmax was liable for damages. Dominion had sued the outlet for $1.6bn.

After the 2020 election, lies about the security of Dominion voting machines, which are widely used in the US, became central to Donald Trump’s false claim that the election was stolen from him. Allies and other rightwing personalities made baseless claims that votes had been flipped and that the equipment was not secure.

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/62406593

Washington (United States) (AFP) – The US Supreme Court sided with multinational giant Bayer on Thursday, overturning a lower court ruling that exposed the company to thousands of claims that the Monsanto weedkiller Roundup causes cancer.

In a 7-2 decision, the US high court sent back to a Missouri state court a $1.25 million jury award against the Germany-based company, concluding that the US Environmental Protection Agency's determination that Roundup is not a carcinogen preempts claims in state court tying the product to a cancer diagnosis.

Shares of Bayer, which acquired Monsanto in 2018, soared 18.7 percent on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The ruling is expected to speed efforts by the industrial giant to move past the litigation following billions of dollars in settlements.

The Supreme Court case stems from a suit brought by John Durnell, who had won a failure-to-warn suit in a Missouri court in 2024.

Durnell -- who relied on Monsanto marketing that Roundup was safe to spray on clothing -- blamed the product for his blood cancer diagnosis.

He argued that the International Agency for Research on Cancer considers glyphosate, one of Roundup's ingredients, a probable human carcinogen.

But Bayer, whose case was backed by the administration of US President Donald Trump, argued before the conservative-dominated Supreme Court that it should be shielded from state lawsuits since the EPA approved the sale of Roundup to consumers and farmers without any warnings.

The US Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) "demands uniformity and expressly preempts state labeling requirements," Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the majority opinion, reversing the judgment of the Missouri Court of Appeals.

The EPA review "critically evaluates the pesticide's label to ensure that the label contains all warnings necessary to protect human health," the majority said. "And after EPA decides the appropriate warnings for a pesticide's label, a manufacturer is legally required to use that label unless and until EPA subsequently approves or requires a new label."

But Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, said the majority had misread the federal statute, arguing that the EPA's approval of a pesticide's label does not affect FIFRA's prohibition on misbranding pesticides.

The statute "does not treat as infallible the EPA's judgement as to whether FIFRA's midbranding provision has been violated," she wrote.

The court "misunderstands FIFRA's requirement, misinterprets the scope of FIFRA's preemption and ultimately leaves Durness without a remedy for the significant harms he has suffered."

...

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/59709

Philip Earle, Liberal Member of Parliament for ‘Labrador,’ views an Innu history timeline during a visit to Sheshatshiu Innu First Nation on Wedneday. The timeline was meant to be displayed in a provincial museum last Sunday — before the event was cancelled by Innu Nation. Photo courtesy Innu Nation/Facebook

Fallout continues from the last-minute cancellation of an exhibition of Innu culture and history in “Newfoundland and Labrador” — after its organizers said the province tried to censor it.

After two years of planning, “Innu Pakassiun (“Innu tools for survival”) was set to open on Sunday at the Labrador Interpretation Centre, on National Indigenous Peoples Day.

The centre is run by The Rooms, the province’s official archives, museum and gallery — a Crown corporation overseen by provincial appointees, including the deputy minister of Tourism, Culture, Arts and Recreation.

But instead, the Innu Nation abruptly scrapped the long-awaited display.

It accused the province of ordering the removal of all cultural items and timelines older than 300 years, contradicting the government’s preferred version of history.

The exhibition’s planner, Innu Nation Cultural Guardian Jodie Ashini, said she was “heartbroken” when a representative of The Rooms called her as she was setting up the exhibition on June 17.

“The truck had arrived, and that morning I had videos of it unpacking — live videos of our exhibit pieces being brought in,” Ashini told IndigiNews.

“I’d been helping dress mannequins, and it was just excitement … you could feel the buzz in the air, the energy.”

According to Ashini, The Rooms’ representative told her the exhibition could not include its timeline of Innu existence and history, along with extensive archeological evidence that supported it, because it would go against the government’s acceptable timeline of Innu history — which dates back just three centuries.

“At that point, I felt like they had backed us into a corner,” she said, “because they had delivered everything, and I guess maybe was hoping that because it was here, that we wouldn’t say no.”

This Innu history timeline was meant to be displayed in a provincially run museum in ‘Labrador’ last Sunday — until the event was cancelled by Innu Nation over government interference allegations. Photo courtesy Innu Nation/Facebook

Controversy escalates — along with solidarity

The display of ancestral Innu items held at two museums — including the Canadian Museum of History and The Rooms itself — had been billed as a “milestone on the path to repatriation and … bringing our belongings home.”

The Innu Nation explained the decision to cancel “Innu Pakassiun,” saying The Rooms’ demands contradicted “the accepted academic consensus timeline of Innu history in Labrador,” according to a statement.

“Instead the Innu would be required to support the province’s own controversial theory of Innu history.”

Innu Nation’s Grand Chief Simon Pokue added that “attempts to restrict or redefine Innu history to suit the province’s legal objectives are unacceptable.”

The cancellation led to a swift outcry over the coming week. The next day, the Labrador Friendship Centre decried what it called the “alteration of Indigenous histories to fit colonial narratives.”

It called the allegations a “continuation of systems that erase Indigenous voices and control Indigenous stories,” the centre stated on Facebook.

“The stories of the Innu people belong solely to them. Their history should not be subject to political approval, revision, or erasure.”

Later that day, the Innu Development Limited Partnership withdrew in protest from Expo Labrador, an major annual economic development and business conference opening the next morning.

The nation also postponed its planned community consultations about an out-of-court settlement agreement with Hydro-Quebec, citing “the insult from the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador,” and “the province’s position on our Innu timeline,” according to a statement posted to Facebook.

The next day, members of Innu Nation protested outside the Expo Labrador event in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, where Premier Tony Wakeham was the planned keynote speaker.

But then the organizer, the Labrador North Chamber of Commerce, cancelled the entire trade show, pending “a resolution between the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador and the Innu of Labrador,” according to a statement.

“We are disappointed the government did not address the outstanding concerns of the Labrador Innu this week,” the organization said on Tuesday, “and we will be cancelling the remainder of the conference.”

READ MORE: Labrador Friendship Centre celebrates Inuit, Innu cultures on National Indigenous Peoples Day

Representatives of the province’s other Indigenous groups have rallied behind Innu Nation.

On Saturday, the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador (AFNQL) stated it “denounces the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s interference in historical facts,” and that “any attempt to revise, question, or diminish the history of the First Peoples of these lands is appalling.”

On Wednesday, the Nunatsiavut Government — elected by Inuit in “Labrador” — expressed its solidarity.

“As Inuit, we know what it means to have our story challenged or misrepresented,” said President Johannes Lampe in a statement.

“The Innu Nation has shown tremendous leadership and patience, and they deserve a provincial partner that listens, understands, and acts in good faith.”

A day later, the Mi’kmaq community of Miawpukek First Nation issued its own statement, declaring it “stands behind the Innu Nation and their denouncing of Newfoundland and Labrador’s cancel-culture approach to Innu history and presence on their homeland.”

Ashini said the outpouring of solidarity has strengthened the community’s resolve to fight for their history.

“Now it’s moved to anger, to strength even,” Ashini said.

“Everyone is coming together, all the different organizations, people are working together … We will fight what the province is trying to do.”

A woman wears a shirt decrying the ‘Newfoundland and Labrador’ government at a protest after the cancellation of an Innu Nation history exhibition. Photo courtesy Greg Locke/Innu Nation

Premier and minister apologize

The Rooms did not respond to questions about the exhibition, but referred IndigiNews to the province.

In a letter sent Tuesday to Innu Nation, Premier Wakeham said he and the Indigenous relations and reconciliation minister had met with leaders and apologized.

“I deeply regret the events that produced the controversy over the Innu exhibit and I apologize for those events,” Wakeham wrote.

“The provincial government will not require statutory institutions publicly displaying Indigenous culture to establish a timeline of the occupancy of land in Labrador.”

Meanwhile, the minister of Labrador Affairs and Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation said she’d hoped to find a “solution that respects all points of view” and “a compromise to allow the exhibit to proceed.”

“I understand that much time, care, and effort has gone into its preparation,” Lela Evans stated, “and I recognize the importance of the Innu sharing their history and story so that all Newfoundlanders and Labradorians may better understand their culture.”

Neither Wakeham nor Evans addressed the allegations that the government had interfered in the exhibition’s Innu history timeline, or imposed its own 300-year interpretation on Innu history.

But while much of the furor and media attention has focused on the exhibition’s cancellation — and province’s apology for it — leaders of the Innu Nation said on Wednesday officials had failed to address “the central issue … the province’s continued promotion of a narrative that questions thousands of years of Innu presence in Nitassinan.”

The archeology department at the Memorial University of Newfoundland called the province’s historical stance “flawed,” backing up Innu knowledge about their long history in the region.

The faculty’s anthropologists and archeologists — including former Canadian Archaeological Association president Lisa Rankin — said there is “a substantial body of archaeological and ethnohistorical scholarship” confirming Innu presence “extending well beyond 300 years,” on top of Innu knowledge.

Lela Evans (left), Minister of Labrador Affairs and Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation, poses for a photo alongside Chief Justice Raymond Whalen (centre) and Premier Tony Wakeham on Feb. 24. Photo courtesy Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

‘Knowledge passed down from thousands of years’

Ashini sits on the board of the Indigenous Heritage Circle, and was appointed to Parks Canada’s Indigenous Cultural Heritage Advisory Council.

“We have oral stories; we have knowledge passed down from thousands of years,” said the former archeology field technician and archeology student at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

She accused the province of “erasing who we are as a people,” alleging its archeologists “totally disregard any of our oral history or because it’s not [in] written form.”

Non-Innu researchers — including those insisting Innu didn’t exist in “Labrador” prior to the 18th century — do not know Innu history or tools as Innu do, she said.

Ashini, who is from Sheshatshiu Innu First Nation — one of two Innu settlements in “Labrador” — gave an example of an instance where outside archeologists found an Innu tool, and then debated whether it was a toy plane propeller or a hand off a clock.

But she and her father — former Innu Nation Grand Chief and land claim negotiator Daniel Ashini — identified the object as in fact a traditional tool.

“’No, guys, this is a needle for weaving snowshoes,’” she recalled informing the researchers.

“And that’s how my story would have been interpreted if it wasn’t for my father and myself on that archeology site. That one example is proof of how sites can be interpreted so wrong without Innu knowledge and perspective.”

READ MORE: Child welfare system carries on residential ‘school’ legacy, Innu families tell inquiry: ‘When is it going to stop?’

An exhibit of pride in heritage

“Innu Pakassiun” was created to display Innu belongings taken and stored in Canadian Museum of History and The Rooms collections.

Ashini said it included cultural items such as snowshoes, moccasins, caribou-painted coats, beadwork, red ochre pigment for painting.

“There’s just a lot of different things … taken away,” Ashini said, “and now were able to come home after over 100 years sitting in drawers and museums.”

For her, the hardest part of cancelling the long-planned exhibition was “feeling like I was letting my people down.”

She said many fellow Innu told her “Innu Pakassiun” felt like “pieces of their mother and father and grandparents” coming home.

“It was really a place to bring children and let them discover who our ancestors were,” she explained.

“There’s a lot of times now they’re not represented in Newfoundland and Labrador curriculum in school, and they don’t see themselves getting recognized.”

Having kids see their long history reflected in a provincial museum, she added, “I thought would be really beneficial to them.”

But Ashini said “Innu Pakassiun” cannot be shown to the public outside of The Rooms, because only the museum provides the needed climate-controlled rooms, security and pest control for safely storing of cultural items and belongings.

“They need to have security in order for the insurance, and they can’t be just put into any building,” she said.

“So, they have dictated all of the power, even when our items are to come home they come with clauses about how we protect them.”

She believes the government is dragging its feet on a four-decade old land claim by Innu, and that the latest scandal occurred “because Newfoundland and Labrador is trying to not recognize us.”

“Just saying something and not following through won’t fix it,” she said. “There has to be a big acknowledgement from the government now that they messed up.

“The exhibit is set up, it’s ready to go, but the door’s locked.”

But she is still hopeful, she told IndigiNews, because “our ancestors came home and that their strength is here with us — the Innu people — and this is really come to bring us their strength, maybe unite us.”

The post Innu Nation ‘moved to anger, to strength’ after accusing province of censoring history appeared first on Indiginews.

---

From Indiginews via This RSS Feed.