Goldmage263 replysh.itjust.works3Hide 3 repliesHang on. Did you actually comment this two years ago or is lemmy bugged? This post just showed up for me today in the "hot" category.7Reply
uunexposedhazard replydiscuss.tchncs.deI guess some sorted by old and upvoted this post which made it active enought to come up in hot3Reply
nnothacking replydiscuss.tchncs.deLooking at the active category, it uses the date of the last comment, weird.2Reply
Duchess replylemmy.world1Hide 1 replytrams are even better imo, but i could be biased bc my city has one that's pretty brand new and it's very posh.1Reply
Goldmage263 sh.itjust.worksEven if projects in cities are too "costly and complicated" at least start to use existing rail lines for translortation from suburbs to major cities and downtown districts.1Reply
8 replies
Yes, abolish all private vehicles
Hang on. Did you actually comment this two years ago or is lemmy bugged? This post just showed up for me today in the "hot" category.
I guess some sorted by old and upvoted this post which made it active enought to come up in hot
Looking at the active category, it uses the date of the last comment, weird.
trams are even better imo, but i could be biased bc my city has one that's pretty brand new and it's very posh.
that's a tram
Even if projects in cities are too "costly and complicated" at least start to use existing rail lines for translortation from suburbs to major cities and downtown districts.
And then people say that they want training but then dont use a train