Spyke
lemm.ee

"The agenda is, 'let's reduce injuries in children and youth and how can we do that?'"

How terrible.

7
Throwawayreply
lemm.ee

By lying. Forgot that part.

How are people supposed to trust studies when stuff like this happens? It erodes trust when studies lie.

-8
lemm.ee

How are people supposed to trust studies when stuff like this happens?

By reading the study and not relying on someone's interpretation of it.

6

Thats the problem, to properly understand studies, you have to have a solid background in that field. You cant expect the average person to have knowledge in any particular subject.

-4
PizzaManreply
lemm.ee

Seems like it was an oversight, not an intentional lie. If somebody calls an airsoft rifle a firearm, that's colloquially appropriate, even if not legally correct.

Language is muddy. That's life.

-1
Throwawayreply
lemm.ee

Who on earth calls an airsoft gun a firearm? I can understand gun, but firearm is a formal term. Its not colloquially correct, and even if it was, a study should know the difference.

The definition of firearm is not nearly muddy enough to excuse that.

-5

You reached the end

[Canada][2017] Gun advocate says recent 'firearms' study misleading, could influence policy | Spyke