Spyke
lisp·Lisp Communitybycadar

If there is one Lisp function/macro/feature that you would like to see in a non-Lisp language, which one would it be?

This is another Friday social topic. You are aimlessly wandering around a beautiful hilltop by a sea when an angel approaches you from the opposite direction. She is no ordinary angel. She is a Lisp angel! She will grant one Lisp wish to you. Before she can fulfill your wish, she needs this information from you:

  1. Your favorite Lisp dialect.
  2. Your favorite non-Lisp programming language.
  3. Your favorite standard library function/macro/feature from your favorite Lisp dialect that you want to see in your favorite non-Lisp programming language.

Once you tell these 3 things to the angel, she will magically add your chosen feature to your chosen non-Lisp programming language.

What are your answers going to be?

View original on lemmy.ml
9
Comments7
Litanys
lem.cochrun.xyz

Favorite lisp is common lisp. Favorite other is rust. S expression syntax. If rust had the simple syntax and s expressions of lisp... I'd be so happy.

4
Ramin Honary
lemmy.ml
  1. "favorite Lisp dialect": Scheme (Guile, Gambit, and MIT/GNU)
  2. "favorite non-Lisp programming language": Haskell
  3. "favorite standard library function/macro/feature": homoiconicity, i.e. both code syntax and data structures built from S-expression, which makes features like syntax-case feature possible, and the ability to implement declarative domain specific languages with Haskell-like type checking on large parts of your program at compile time. If every language would like this, my life would be soooo much easier and less stressful.

One thing I hate about other languages is complicated syntax that makes it difficult or impossible to do macro-programming. S-expressions are a minimalist syntax that allows lisp to be well-adapted to most any use case, and features like defmacro or syntax-case are very well designed mechanisms for doing exactly that. Other languages like Python and JavaScript have macro-programming implementations but they are so hacky and not very well designed compared to most Lisps, which have the feature built right into the language.

2
charje
lemmy.ml
  1. Common Lisp
  2. Haskell I guess
  3. defmacro. This would probably involve changing the syntax to list form like axel does.
1
charjereply
lemmy.ml

True. They are not near as nicely integrated as lisp macros though.

2
tentaclius
lemm.ee
  1. Scheme
  2. Zig
  3. (let loop ((...)) (cond ...))

I love how recursive looping reads and unfortunately there aren't many languages implementing this approach.

1

You reached the end

If there is one Lisp function/macro/feature that you would like to see in a non-Lisp language, which one would it be? | Spyke