Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

10 replies

Godortreply
lemm.ee

Assuming that you're correct so far, in your first column, you can deduce that the 9 and the 5 are separated by the bottom-most X you have in place. With the 9(and maybe the 1) somewhere in the middle section and the 5 somewhere in the bottom section

2

Do you know what's really stupid? I already saw that the 9 had to go there, I just forgot to do the overlap trick (I've only really discovered nonograms this week). Cheers!

1
lemmy.world

I'm trying it out now to match yours, and found a row you missed so far.

  1. The 8,2,8,5 row you can get another 4 confirmed squares (Second 8). Doing that will give you a starting point for the 2,1,10 and 1,9 columns, letting you X out a few squares below.

  2. The 4,3,4,2,2,7 column you can confirm one square on the second 4. That lets you get a few more tiles on the 4,4,4,1,1,1,3 row

2
lemmy.world

The 8,2,8,5 row you can get another 4 confirmed squares (Second 8)

Ahhh how did I not see that! Cheers

1
lemmy.world

Hopefully that helps you to continue.

Let me know if you need help or a reference pic. After a lot of work I finally cleared it. Still have no idea what picture it is though.

2
lemmy.world

Well I made an irredeemable mistake and have had to give up. Can I see what it was please?

1
lemmy.world

Here's the final result. No idea what the picture is supposed to be, or maybe my imagination is just bad.

2
lemmy.world

Yeah that's totally not anything, is it? How disappointing. Is there a better site that actually has real pictures?

1

You reached the end