wpolitics·politics bywwaxwork Man named in Supreme Court’s Colorado gay rights ruling says he didn’t request a wedding websitehttps://www.denverpost.com/2023/07/01/supreme-court-303-creative-ruling-stewart-gay-rights/Open linkView original on lemmy.world143Comments12Reply
PPhysnrd lemmy.world1Hide 1 replyDirect link to AP news. Same article, no paywall https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-lgbtq-website-385ec911ce0ca2f415966078eddb66da37Reply
SSaintpaul lemmy.worldhttps://www.npr.org/2023/07/01/1185632827/web-designer-supreme-court-gay-couples# Non paywall link.22Reply
Captain Poofter lemmy.worldWe really need to get these supreme court stooges out of there yesterday10Reply
AAnimoscity replykbin.social1Hide 1 replyIf you took a second to read any of the articles linked here the person in question didn’t know until a reporter reached out to them this week.2Reply
wwwaxwork replylemmy.worldBecause no one thought that anyone would actually file a made up case to the Supreme Court..1Reply
kkitonthenet kbin.social1Hide 1 replyhuh... just a fully fake case? none of the things that the case is about happened?3Reply
wwwaxwork replylemmy.worldYep. Not one thing in the filing actually happened. The Supreme court should never have heard the case.1Reply
MMaeve kbin.socialI think Lorrie Smith’s (lack of) reputable credibility precludes any thinking person hiring her services.1Reply
12 replies
Direct link to AP news. Same article, no paywall
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-lgbtq-website-385ec911ce0ca2f415966078eddb66da
The guy isn't even gay and is married. This shit better get repealed.
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/01/1185632827/web-designer-supreme-court-gay-couples#
Non paywall link.
This certainly feels on brand.
We really need to get these supreme court stooges out of there yesterday
The article is paywalled.
If you took a second to read any of the articles linked here the person in question didn’t know until a reporter reached out to them this week.
Because no one thought that anyone would actually file a made up case to the Supreme Court..
huh... just a fully fake case? none of the things that the case is about happened?
Yep. Not one thing in the filing actually happened. The Supreme court should never have heard the case.
Shoot there’s a paywall what does the article say?
I think Lorrie Smith’s (lack of) reputable credibility precludes any thinking person hiring her services.