Spyke
lemmy.world

TL;DR... Google is limiting how many rules that extensions can have. Ad blockers need ~300k to run effectively, Google will limit them to 30k in Chrome citing "privacy and a light weight user experience" as the reason. This change will effectively make ad blockers in chrome all but useless. The solution will likely mean switching to more privacy focused browsers, such as Firefox.

54
lemmy.ml

This one and the Tux one have been getting a lot of use lately thanks to Chrome and Win11.

53

I have embraced firefox as my primary browser now. I have a few remaining cookies on chrome that I have to re-establish in FF, and then I can't even imagine any reason I'd even need to use chrome again other than some obscure internal web app that I can spin up on a throwaway virtual machine.

5

“Could” as if there’s a possibility it will respect your privacy lmfao

17
lemmy.world

With that bs I have been changing everything away from Google. It takes a little work but I am looking the results so far.

14

Same here. I daresay my phone is now finally again as nice as in the early days of smart phones.

1

Google *’s * plan could be a privacy disaster.

I thought it might read better not being so unnecessarily specific.

11
lemmy.world

Show me on the doll where you let advertisers touch you. I suspect it's most all of your orifices?

5
Senselessreply
feddit.de

So you won't have a problem telling me your address so I can make photos of you shitting and post them on the internet. Seen as privacy is just a circle jerk.

11

Care to incorporate, offer me something of value, write up a terms of service, contract, and get a 3rd party ISO 27001 series audit? Then we can chat.

Until then you personally aren't really in a position to get that information.

Imagine wanting to lazily skip those steps and ask for information. Topkek!

-17

You reached the end

Google Chrome’s ad-blocking plan could be a privacy disaster | TechRadar | Spyke