First consensus is a thing. Secondly not every subjective opinion is of equal value. One opinion may be grounded in historical context, technical understanding, philosophical ideas, and other contextual viewpoints, whereas another might be as simple "I like that color". Those are not of equivalent value.
The first graders painting is art. However, just because it's art doesn't mean it's good art.
First consensus is a thing. Secondly not every subjective opinion is of equal value. One opinion may be grounded in historical context, technical understanding, philosophical ideas, and other contextual viewpoints, whereas another might be as simple "I like that color". Those are not of equivalent value.
You know you don't have to respond right?
Your comment is bad.
This is enough information to determine that the founder is an insufferable person
How is that's dystopic? It's just stupid.
It's a thinly-veiled justification for allowing AI-generated art on a platform whose user base clearly does not want it.
Where does it say what the user base wants?