Spyke

A baby born on Dec 31st is 1 year old, and the next day would be 2 years old ... A 2 day old baby would be considered 2 years old. Glad they decided that this was beyond odd.

30

My daughter was born at 22:30 on December 31. In Korea she would have been considered 2 years old when she was born less than 2 hours previously.

5

Ehh, I'm sad that another country is being forced to Western standards and lose an unique part of their culture.

1

Too bad they didn't keep their very own system of measurement which is so much more convenient than the internationally recognized and simple system... Not looking in anybody's direction

19
feddit.de

babies are considered a year old on the day they’re born

Is there any useful idea behind this? That sounds completely dumb.

6
Troyreply
lemmy.ca

It's just semantics. When you are born, you are in your first year of life, not your zeroth year of life. After a full year, you are one year old. Grammar varies from language to language, and sometimes one feels more natural.

Imagine everyone in English said "I'm in my 32nd year" instead of "I'm 31 years old." Now you meet a foreigner who says the opposite. Translation issues abound!

28
bionicjoeyreply
lemmy.ca

To be fair, we do the same shit with what century we are in.

6
Troyreply
lemmy.ca

You're absolutely right. But as most people don't measure their age in centuries (yet), it isn't a problem.

I'm hoping the debate emerges when I'm in my 7th century.

2
ssjmarxreply
lemmy.ml

When you are born, you are in your first year of life, not your zeroth year of life.

There are one type of person in this world. Those that understand arrays, and those that don't.

5

I'm that one person who don't understand it.

I heard of 10 people and "binary" but this I see first time. Care to explain?

1

That's not a birth day. It's an inaccurate conception day and for most of it we weren't alive yet.

2

You reached the end

South Koreans become younger overnight after country scraps 'Korean age' | CNN | Spyke