I don't get it, apart from companies wanting to cover their corporate real estate investments.
All of my work is on a computer
All of my colleagues' work is on computer.
So why the fuck would I want to meet in person to address a problem? So one of us can literally breathe down the other's neck looking at the same screen?
For their greedy brains, this is literally about control and surveillance. They can't make sure that you are working the full company time and even overtime while at home in your comfort and pyjamas.
Correct - not that their big-brother asses would be caught dead in areas where the employees work. They just want to feel like people are there. It's enough to bring in a cardboard cut-out.
What's wild about that is that I am working outside business hours when I wfh. I'm showing up earlier, staying later, doing little quick things when i think of them rather than putting them off until the next day in the office, and I'm taking a lot less PTO because there's a pretty wide gulf between "too sick to get fully dressed, drive for 45 minutes and face actual human beings in person" and "too sick to accomplish anything if I'm left alone and allowed to take breaks when i need them". But you're right, there is a certain school of management that teaches that employees are an enemy who want nothing more than to steal from the company by being paid to do nothing, that a manager's primary job is to catch and punish these slackers, and that a lack of evidence of employees slacking off is proof that they're lazy and smart enough to hide it. Fortunately for me I now have a boss who knows that I do this work because I like it and that the team and the work will benefit most from me being left alone to do it and occasionally helped with blockers as they come up.
You actually touched on something that really pisses me off about my 100% work from home job.
It's the fact that my boss can somehow justify that you roll yourself out of bed and log in. He literally uses the phrase sometimes "too sick to log in?" As a means of discouragement from calling out sick, or at the very least get some productivity out of you while you're sick.
Name a job that would try this shit in real life? When you've called out you've called out, it doesn't mean reduced workload because you're sick ffs.
Idk, literally all of them? The fact that it's physically impossible for them to bring the workload to your house doesn't mean they aren't gonna try every other method of manipulation and social pressure in an effort to get you to sacrifice yourself for the good of the company.
Well, the idea is that there are "levels" to being sick. In CA this shit would never fly.
I don't even like calling it "sick" I call out for the day, period. I'm not calling in sick or calling in hung over or calling in for family reasons, I'm fucking NOT AVAILABLE for today.
This is the bullshit that wfh has brought and of course not all companies are doing this.
They are paying those investments prices if people are in the office or not. At least if people are WFH and used to it, you can downsize your office if and when the need arises.
Are you just shilling against yourself in a game of 4D chess where they can now save money on realestate by forcing you to use your own home for their profit. The best part, you now think it was your idea. A sucker born every day.
Fuck work. It has no place in my home and family, I won’t use my home for their profit. I’ll catch the train into work just to keep it out of my life and the two separated as far as possible.
This is an interesting idea. I am 100% work from home and I can tell you all that it's not all roses.
I have zero work friends, hell I've never met over 75% of them in real life. There is very little room for networking and skills building because I'm in my spare bedroom all the time. I'm glad I'm a little older but if I weren't this would be a career killer in some regards.
I have to think about what I'm going to eat every single day (no running off for lunch) and I'm expected to be on camera during our meetings.
I have zero commute, but that just means I hardly get a chance to ride my motorcycle anymore.
I've gone over my internet cap once, and because we're at home, the AC or the heat or whatever needs to be ran 100% of the time I'm telling you it's not all roses.
When I worked for Bell, they had just ended their WFH policy. I was required to be in the office every day. The rest of my team was still under the policy according to their contract, including my boss who was a 10 minute walk from the office, so they all worked from home. And most of my meetings involved teams in 3 different cities, not to mention the fact that it was Bell, so all meetings were over the phone with a screen sharing app. There were some other people that worked in the office, but they worked with different teams so I didn't interact with them beyond saying "hi" in the break room as I was getting coffee. But it was apparently very important that I be in the office.
Some days I really appreciate the fact that I left IT.
Got laid off from Bell and couldn't find another IT job before EI ran out, so I applied to be a mail carrier. Been doing that ever since. I did apply to a few IT jobs after I started doing mail, but it wasn't long that I realized I could make more where I was and I really didn't miss It all that much. It's a little frustrating when I hit bugs in the software we use, because I could write the bug report in full detail but I have no access to submit it. But then I get done at 1pm on a Friday and I remember why I left that world.
The company I work at has a couple of buildings spread out over a larger campus. Before COVID, you'd just go over to the other building for meetings. Now nobody can be arsed to walk across any more. But we still have to come in because face to face communication is sooo important!
Teams room technician here. Just wanna say= fuck teams. For the love of god, use any implementation of video conferencing besides teams.
One small detail that encapsulates all that's wrong with teams= the software that runs the room-scale experience frequently refers to itself as 'skype for business', even in current, official documentation from Microsoft. Hell, the (well known) default password for the system is the acronym 'sfb'.
Please. If you're spec'ing new software for video conferencing, use anything but teams.
WebEx room systems are great, easy to configure and great service to use, great for ver large conferences (think 1000-5000 or more) and it integrates with Teams meetings as well. That said, Zoom integration is terrible, they need to work on advanced conferencing features such as translator audio channels, echo and noise canceling is utter trash for the app, breakout rooms limited list goes on.
webinars, they coined the term, unmatched especially at very large scale.
New app with integrated meetings app is much better.
Chat and spaces are good,
routing content to SharePoint is great integration for document management and collaboration to protect documents and important content without worrying staff with process
Admin troubleshooting is unmatched when someone complains about an issue it makes it very easy to identify what happened. something teams is absolutely atrocious at (we run both)
Outlook integration is great which integrates with room systems and booking room panels
adhoc meetings from panels outside rooms show in room calendars and all sync which is a nice feature
The bad
Events need better integration
Echo and noise cancellation is poor, get headphones they are a must, mic pickup fades in and out all the time on speakers on various devices or use a room system
Conference translator audio channels don’t seem to exist for large multicultural conferences. +1 for Zoom
video could be crisper, costs money to go 1080p and above
Want
space conferences could be better (not to be confused with meetings/events) with a discord like voice+video+sharing like experience for spaces instead of just bulk calling all members…(would help bring people together more when working remotely) people could just join “live spaces” dropping in and out
We were "encouraged" by our CEO to go back to office and "collaborate". So my rule is now 2 days per week in the office (sometimes 1, sometimes 3, I'm flexible), but when I'm there, no calls/meetinga as much as possible. I'm socialising, shooting the shit, drinking coffee, playing ping pong with my peers. Realistically this works about half thr time, the other half we are organically ending up doing some work, discussing that thing we always wanted to but it never fits in a formal meeting slot, coming up with ideas how to solve a problem we didn't even realise we had until it came up during coffe or smth...
At the beginning my boss complained a bit and I just told him I'm collaborating. He let it go!
So, BTO has a (limited) point, there is value to be there in person sometimes...
There's no point of "everybody together in the office" if we're too busy in Teams meetings or have to focus on individual tasks. The real benefit is when we have days with open calendars and we can discuss stuff and come up with ideas.
And that is without a doubt the biggest reason to show up, the socializing. It definitely sounds like you have a killer deal there with more days at home but added flexibility
My office has hybrid with the same two in office days for everyone, and it is great for communication that works in person and then we get all the work done the other three days without office distractions.
If the days weren't consistent it would be pointless.
In some cases, being in at the same time doesn’t matter because people can’t get of their ass and walk across the street, or sometimes even down the hall!
Source: The environment I work in does exactly this.
The primary issue in this is that for years, both organizations and people have accepted that inside the office is the way that work has always been conducted (not true, by the way), that working in the office is an fundamental, unchangeable human nature and the only way which work can be done, and all attention to keep people happy at work is to iteratively improve by putting foosball table and catered lunches in the office.
So, when COVID showed that working from home is possible, even more efficient at times, against the perceived human nature to show that change can happen and the office isn't even NEEDED, the cynicism kicked in: to admit that work from home regularly is even possible would be to admit that the previous system was fundamentally wrong, and that having a giant office at all is ultimately a waste of money, which is why they are so desperate to revert and remove work from home to somehow justify paying for an office for all these years and that things can never change for the better, ever, and the broken system was to be always accepted.
It's a form of expression of despair, and despair often isn't logical.
The summary version is that you've spent so much time and money on something that you keep it around because you've spent so much time and money on it.
Bank I quit working for 6 months ago did this. During the pandoodle our team was allowed to build itself as though WFH was permanent. Then someone in c-suite realized that the bank owned all the parking garages next to the offices they had all over the country, and that they were missing out on about $12/employee/day, so they started pressuring us to come in. Trouble is, some of our team was in Pittsburgh, some in Cleveland, some in Dallas, some in LA, and at least one we couldn't prove but strongly suspected had his US work permission but was actually working from his family farm in Mexico. So we went from being comfortable in our homes with no commute and doing all of our meetings via teleconferencing to being uncomfortable, having anywhere from a 30 to 90 minute commute depending on which team member you talk to, and still only being able to meet online.
Most things are fine by email, unless they lead to questions. A few people on a zoom/teams to discuss a complex problem followed by an email summarizing the decision is great. Anything larger than a few people by zoom/teams that involves discussion is a train wreck, but they are good for large groups watching a live presentation that includes active Q&A.
Everyone in a zoom/teams with a shitty facilitator are great for appearing to be busy for an hour or two while doing something else.
We're supposed to use Teams for everything, but for some reason some managers sometimes organize meetings with Zoom instead and I hate it every time...
I find working from the office makes it easier to separate from work when I'm trying to relax. Also easier to run errands when I'm already out than after 8hours of work stress combined with "being at home" inertia.
I still remember several months into the pandemic how my then-company's VP brought up how we can go back into the office, but we wouldn't be able to meet in the same room or be in close proximity to each other, and so any/all communications would still need to be done via MS Teams.
I think even he realized how ridiculous that sounded because there was a momentary pause before he finished his sentence.
Hey, the failing precast company I used to work for did this. The plant manager also was having weekly meetings with the office workers so he could read to them from Paul Aker's most recent word vomit on "Lean" as if they were 2nd graders.
I believe business need to adopt a hybrid approach. There are just aspects of human interaction you can't do with teams. I'd you job has your working on a team meeting in person once or twice a week makes a difference.
Obviously it should be a case by case basis. But a lot of these jobs pushing full return to office some actually benefit from that and a more hybrid structure would benefit them.
The problem is that most people literally cannot choose what's best for them.
This is a repetitive theme in society with problems like obesity and poor diet choices.
It's great that you are self-driven and able to make the best choice when it's not the easy choice, but most people just will not choose to go into the office when they aren't forced to. And the quality and pace of work will suffer for it.
It depends on the gig. I'm a software engineer, I'm at my happiest and most productive when I have a user story and no interruptions. I'm also a senior dev and recently passed my 10,000 hours, I don't really benefit too much from close interaction with other devs on my team and their code will teach me anything they have to teach me. Thinking back to when I was fresh out of college, however, I benefited greatly from having a mentor who was close at hand for both coding and cultural learning.
If you live alone and get lonely, go to the office and make friends. I don't care. Just don't drag me away from my wife and cat so I can feign interest in yet another surface level talk with my coworker pretending to care about what they do.
Modern corporations heavily disincentivize making any sort of real connection with your coworkers because most of them will be gone in a couple of years, or laid off, or they might use the info they have on you from your personal life to throw you under the bus.
I'm perfectly happy spending my downtime from work with my family and my off time with my real friends instead of putting on a performance everyday assuring my boss that I'd definitely rather talk about nothing and spend 1/3 of my life making useless small talk.
You’ve never heard of people reporting others taking bad about their company on social media? Even if it’s under a broad context and no name drops people have gotten fired.
Most people don’t realize just how much of their life is shared on social media and are fine with accepting any and all friend/follow requests from coworkers who are friendly enough and not weird.
Yea, working remotely made me realize that I'm actually an extrovert. But, fuck working from office. I don't want to waste 4 hours every day on the commute just to talk to my coworkers. I usually use Slack huddle on my team channel so we can still have a semblance of drop in collaboration.
Problem is, when you sit there with headphones all day, you won't do much socializing. Often all it takes, is just one colleague who can't make it to the office or who works at a different office...
I don't get it, apart from companies wanting to cover their corporate real estate investments.
All of my work is on a computer
All of my colleagues' work is on computer.
So why the fuck would I want to meet in person to address a problem? So one of us can literally breathe down the other's neck looking at the same screen?
GTFO.
You just said it in your first sentence. It's not rocket surgery, your literal meat existence will be used for passive profit.
Oh, I'm aware, but the corporate bull shit they push to sell us on it is insulting to our collective intelligence.
If that’s the reason WFH should be the new normal in a couple of years when leases are up. That won’t happen though.
For their greedy brains, this is literally about control and surveillance. They can't make sure that you are working the full company time and even overtime while at home in your comfort and pyjamas.
Correct - not that their big-brother asses would be caught dead in areas where the employees work. They just want to feel like people are there. It's enough to bring in a cardboard cut-out.
What's wild about that is that I am working outside business hours when I wfh. I'm showing up earlier, staying later, doing little quick things when i think of them rather than putting them off until the next day in the office, and I'm taking a lot less PTO because there's a pretty wide gulf between "too sick to get fully dressed, drive for 45 minutes and face actual human beings in person" and "too sick to accomplish anything if I'm left alone and allowed to take breaks when i need them". But you're right, there is a certain school of management that teaches that employees are an enemy who want nothing more than to steal from the company by being paid to do nothing, that a manager's primary job is to catch and punish these slackers, and that a lack of evidence of employees slacking off is proof that they're lazy and smart enough to hide it. Fortunately for me I now have a boss who knows that I do this work because I like it and that the team and the work will benefit most from me being left alone to do it and occasionally helped with blockers as they come up.
You actually touched on something that really pisses me off about my 100% work from home job.
It's the fact that my boss can somehow justify that you roll yourself out of bed and log in. He literally uses the phrase sometimes "too sick to log in?" As a means of discouragement from calling out sick, or at the very least get some productivity out of you while you're sick.
Name a job that would try this shit in real life? When you've called out you've called out, it doesn't mean reduced workload because you're sick ffs.
Idk, literally all of them? The fact that it's physically impossible for them to bring the workload to your house doesn't mean they aren't gonna try every other method of manipulation and social pressure in an effort to get you to sacrifice yourself for the good of the company.
Well, the idea is that there are "levels" to being sick. In CA this shit would never fly.
I don't even like calling it "sick" I call out for the day, period. I'm not calling in sick or calling in hung over or calling in for family reasons, I'm fucking NOT AVAILABLE for today.
This is the bullshit that wfh has brought and of course not all companies are doing this.
They are paying those investments prices if people are in the office or not. At least if people are WFH and used to it, you can downsize your office if and when the need arises.
Or the lease expires.
Exactly much of my argument for WFH
That's what my company did and it feels a bit odd. Like we have no "home" now.
Or
Are you just shilling against yourself in a game of 4D chess where they can now save money on realestate by forcing you to use your own home for their profit. The best part, you now think it was your idea. A sucker born every day.
Fuck work. It has no place in my home and family, I won’t use my home for their profit. I’ll catch the train into work just to keep it out of my life and the two separated as far as possible.
This is an interesting idea. I am 100% work from home and I can tell you all that it's not all roses.
I have zero work friends, hell I've never met over 75% of them in real life. There is very little room for networking and skills building because I'm in my spare bedroom all the time. I'm glad I'm a little older but if I weren't this would be a career killer in some regards.
I have to think about what I'm going to eat every single day (no running off for lunch) and I'm expected to be on camera during our meetings.
I have zero commute, but that just means I hardly get a chance to ride my motorcycle anymore.
I've gone over my internet cap once, and because we're at home, the AC or the heat or whatever needs to be ran 100% of the time I'm telling you it's not all roses.
When I worked for Bell, they had just ended their WFH policy. I was required to be in the office every day. The rest of my team was still under the policy according to their contract, including my boss who was a 10 minute walk from the office, so they all worked from home. And most of my meetings involved teams in 3 different cities, not to mention the fact that it was Bell, so all meetings were over the phone with a screen sharing app. There were some other people that worked in the office, but they worked with different teams so I didn't interact with them beyond saying "hi" in the break room as I was getting coffee. But it was apparently very important that I be in the office.
Some days I really appreciate the fact that I left IT.
Fuck Bell
Could also be laying off people without doing “layoffs”. Not everybody is going to return to the office, problem solved.
What did you leave it for?
Got laid off from Bell and couldn't find another IT job before EI ran out, so I applied to be a mail carrier. Been doing that ever since. I did apply to a few IT jobs after I started doing mail, but it wasn't long that I realized I could make more where I was and I really didn't miss It all that much. It's a little frustrating when I hit bugs in the software we use, because I could write the bug report in full detail but I have no access to submit it. But then I get done at 1pm on a Friday and I remember why I left that world.
Thank you for sharing! I'm glad you're much happier in your current position. I feel that about knowing you could fix things if you had the access
The company I work at has a couple of buildings spread out over a larger campus. Before COVID, you'd just go over to the other building for meetings. Now nobody can be arsed to walk across any more. But we still have to come in because face to face communication is sooo important!
Mine is exactly the same! :/
Teams room technician here. Just wanna say= fuck teams. For the love of god, use any implementation of video conferencing besides teams.
One small detail that encapsulates all that's wrong with teams= the software that runs the room-scale experience frequently refers to itself as 'skype for business', even in current, official documentation from Microsoft. Hell, the (well known) default password for the system is the acronym 'sfb'.
Please. If you're spec'ing new software for video conferencing, use anything but teams.
also it crashes my audio driver on windows 11 regularly, so fucking annoying....
only teams manages to do that... somehow
WebEx room systems are great, easy to configure and great service to use, great for ver large conferences (think 1000-5000 or more) and it integrates with Teams meetings as well. That said, Zoom integration is terrible, they need to work on advanced conferencing features such as translator audio channels, echo and noise canceling is utter trash for the app, breakout rooms limited list goes on.
I've heard good stuff about WebEx! How does the desktop app perform, from your experience?
The good
The bad
Want
Thanks for the breakdown!! I agree, a live event option would be super cool!
Idk, most teleconference solutions are pretty much the same. Our teams rooms have been working very well imo.
Zoom is worse though from a security standpoint
We were "encouraged" by our CEO to go back to office and "collaborate". So my rule is now 2 days per week in the office (sometimes 1, sometimes 3, I'm flexible), but when I'm there, no calls/meetinga as much as possible. I'm socialising, shooting the shit, drinking coffee, playing ping pong with my peers. Realistically this works about half thr time, the other half we are organically ending up doing some work, discussing that thing we always wanted to but it never fits in a formal meeting slot, coming up with ideas how to solve a problem we didn't even realise we had until it came up during coffe or smth... At the beginning my boss complained a bit and I just told him I'm collaborating. He let it go!
So, BTO has a (limited) point, there is value to be there in person sometimes...
I'm a strong advocate for this.
There's no point of "everybody together in the office" if we're too busy in Teams meetings or have to focus on individual tasks. The real benefit is when we have days with open calendars and we can discuss stuff and come up with ideas.
And that is without a doubt the biggest reason to show up, the socializing. It definitely sounds like you have a killer deal there with more days at home but added flexibility
This is why hybrid is a dumb idea unless everyone in the meeting is in the office on the same day.
My office has hybrid with the same two in office days for everyone, and it is great for communication that works in person and then we get all the work done the other three days without office distractions.
If the days weren't consistent it would be pointless.
In some cases, being in at the same time doesn’t matter because people can’t get of their ass and walk across the street, or sometimes even down the hall!
Source: The environment I work in does exactly this.
The primary issue in this is that for years, both organizations and people have accepted that inside the office is the way that work has always been conducted (not true, by the way), that working in the office is an fundamental, unchangeable human nature and the only way which work can be done, and all attention to keep people happy at work is to iteratively improve by putting foosball table and catered lunches in the office.
So, when COVID showed that working from home is possible, even more efficient at times, against the perceived human nature to show that change can happen and the office isn't even NEEDED, the cynicism kicked in: to admit that work from home regularly is even possible would be to admit that the previous system was fundamentally wrong, and that having a giant office at all is ultimately a waste of money, which is why they are so desperate to revert and remove work from home to somehow justify paying for an office for all these years and that things can never change for the better, ever, and the broken system was to be always accepted.
It's a form of expression of despair, and despair often isn't logical.
Isn't this the sunk cost fallacy?
For the unitiated: https://yourbias.is/the-sunk-cost-fallacy
The summary version is that you've spent so much time and money on something that you keep it around because you've spent so much time and money on it.
It is! But I also think the reason is more than just the sunken cost fallacy.
That seems likely to me.
I could speculate on what that might be, but there's little value in such speculation.
I hope you have a wonderful day!
You too!
But playing dumb is way funnier though...
Don’t all beautiful women actually need to play dumb?
You watched the monologue part in that movie I can't promote right now, right?
Bank I quit working for 6 months ago did this. During the pandoodle our team was allowed to build itself as though WFH was permanent. Then someone in c-suite realized that the bank owned all the parking garages next to the offices they had all over the country, and that they were missing out on about $12/employee/day, so they started pressuring us to come in. Trouble is, some of our team was in Pittsburgh, some in Cleveland, some in Dallas, some in LA, and at least one we couldn't prove but strongly suspected had his US work permission but was actually working from his family farm in Mexico. So we went from being comfortable in our homes with no commute and doing all of our meetings via teleconferencing to being uncomfortable, having anywhere from a 30 to 90 minute commute depending on which team member you talk to, and still only being able to meet online.
Zoom > Google meet > teams > in person meetings
Sending a fucking email > any kind of meeting
If people read emails, they are great.
Most things are fine by email, unless they lead to questions. A few people on a zoom/teams to discuss a complex problem followed by an email summarizing the decision is great. Anything larger than a few people by zoom/teams that involves discussion is a train wreck, but they are good for large groups watching a live presentation that includes active Q&A.
Everyone in a zoom/teams with a shitty facilitator are great for appearing to be busy for an hour or two while doing something else.
We're supposed to use Teams for everything, but for some reason some managers sometimes organize meetings with Zoom instead and I hate it every time...
Fucking hate Teams.
I fucking hate in person meetings more
It's getting better. A couple years ago it was a hot mess. I do still have to manually kill the app and restart it if my VPN acts up, though.
I didn't have one less Zoom call in the office vs WFH.
Muh water cooler
Some days, I want a change of environment. I'm not completely against going back to the office but it should be voluntary.
You can change your own environment?
I'm built different
I find working from the office makes it easier to separate from work when I'm trying to relax. Also easier to run errands when I'm already out than after 8hours of work stress combined with "being at home" inertia.
It's harder to oppress you if you aren't actually there
The whisper voice is a thing now since people are going back to their capitalist-dystopian, employer friendly open floor offices.
We missed them so fucking much!
I still remember several months into the pandemic how my then-company's VP brought up how we can go back into the office, but we wouldn't be able to meet in the same room or be in close proximity to each other, and so any/all communications would still need to be done via MS Teams.
I think even he realized how ridiculous that sounded because there was a momentary pause before he finished his sentence.
Hey, the failing precast company I used to work for did this. The plant manager also was having weekly meetings with the office workers so he could read to them from Paul Aker's most recent word vomit on "Lean" as if they were 2nd graders.
I believe business need to adopt a hybrid approach. There are just aspects of human interaction you can't do with teams. I'd you job has your working on a team meeting in person once or twice a week makes a difference.
What about no WFH, Hybrid or back to office and just use common sense.
Stop treating peoplw like they can't choose whats best for them.
I go into the office... When I need to. It's a pretty radical idea.
Could be 0 days a week? Could be 5. It depends what I'm doing and who I'm working with.
Sadly hybrid often means (2-3) days in the office. Why? Why must we bucket things? It's stupid.
Obviously it should be a case by case basis. But a lot of these jobs pushing full return to office some actually benefit from that and a more hybrid structure would benefit them.
The problem is that most people literally cannot choose what's best for them.
This is a repetitive theme in society with problems like obesity and poor diet choices.
It's great that you are self-driven and able to make the best choice when it's not the easy choice, but most people just will not choose to go into the office when they aren't forced to. And the quality and pace of work will suffer for it.
Yeah! Like sex!
Or retrieving a document from a network printer.
It depends on the gig. I'm a software engineer, I'm at my happiest and most productive when I have a user story and no interruptions. I'm also a senior dev and recently passed my 10,000 hours, I don't really benefit too much from close interaction with other devs on my team and their code will teach me anything they have to teach me. Thinking back to when I was fresh out of college, however, I benefited greatly from having a mentor who was close at hand for both coding and cultural learning.
Exchange, SharePoint, Active Directory all pushed into the cloud, Office 365 the only upgrade path, Teams the only collab software in their ecosystem.
Linux winning the server market was the worst thing to happen to normie workstations in a generation at heavily MS shops, that cost is trickling down.
(To be clear, I’m not against Linux, but all the pointy-hairs who need to have a Microsoft shop are going to be feeling the cost)
Someone mentioned Linux?
I use Arch btw.
What do you mean by this exactly?
(Genuinely curious, as my goal is to have Linux Workstations be an option for our devs)
This is simply not true.
One pro about working with the rest of your coworkers in flesh is socialization. You get to talk with people during the day.
At home it's you, alone (if you live alone).
Of corse, some folks has it better working alone. I wouldn't have.
And, all work cannot be done from home.
If you live alone and get lonely, go to the office and make friends. I don't care. Just don't drag me away from my wife and cat so I can feign interest in yet another surface level talk with my coworker pretending to care about what they do.
Modern corporations heavily disincentivize making any sort of real connection with your coworkers because most of them will be gone in a couple of years, or laid off, or they might use the info they have on you from your personal life to throw you under the bus.
I'm perfectly happy spending my downtime from work with my family and my off time with my real friends instead of putting on a performance everyday assuring my boss that I'd definitely rather talk about nothing and spend 1/3 of my life making useless small talk.
Jesus christ what dystopian hellscape do you hail from?
You’ve never heard of people reporting others taking bad about their company on social media? Even if it’s under a broad context and no name drops people have gotten fired.
Most people don’t realize just how much of their life is shared on social media and are fine with accepting any and all friend/follow requests from coworkers who are friendly enough and not weird.
I don't use social media so never had that issue and never heard of anyone else having that problem.
I haven't experienced that much negativity among coworkers or corporations in my work life.
But you do you - it's fine as long as nobody gets hurt.
Yea, working remotely made me realize that I'm actually an extrovert. But, fuck working from office. I don't want to waste 4 hours every day on the commute just to talk to my coworkers. I usually use Slack huddle on my team channel so we can still have a semblance of drop in collaboration.
Yeah - long traveling distances between work and home sucks and takes away from well-being in other aspects of life.
Problem is, when you sit there with headphones all day, you won't do much socializing. Often all it takes, is just one colleague who can't make it to the office or who works at a different office...
Yeah. In that case.
There are many different cases, and stuff feels and works out differently accordingly.
Yes, socialising at minimal levels is a requirement
Believe it or not, also Teams.