US says Netanyahu has to rein in ‘extremist’ settlers in West Bank
The United States is warning Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to rein in “extremist” settlers in the West Bank in the wake of reports of violence against Palestinians. “We…
https://thehill.com/homenews/4281922-us-says-netanyahu-has-to-rein-in-extremist-settlers-in-west-bank/Open linkView original on kbin.social308
Comments48
There shouldn't be settlements in the West Bank.
The right to self defense does not extend to Palestinians illegally forced off their own lands by Israel.
If they had the same rights then Israel would never have been able to be formed. I can't imagine why Palestinians might be a bit upset.
I'm confused, I thought the rules based international order that the United States and the EU lectures others about would apply here.
There shouldn't ba an Israel
US: “Yeah, if you could land grab and displace people without making a massive fuss and killings, that would be super cool…”
All settlers are extremist and the fact they're called settlers instead of occupiers stealing land is ridiculous
Right? The normalization of occupation and stealing land in this day and age… it’s downright insanity.
And then people wonder why organizations like Hamas exist…
Any other context, they'd be call Colonizers.
This is a just a show by the United States.
It vetoes UN resolutions about settlements in the West Bank.
I'm glad this is being said. There are problems all around and fervor seems to be creating large envelopes of "allowed activity" for those who are willing.
This is a complex situation, but some things are clear. This is one.
Yea most Israelis agree it's fucked too.
Cops are bastards and let it happen, local troops help.
One silver lining is the Israeli Left is having a resurgence and there might be a government trying to roll it back and clean up it's act after this.
Isrealis have repeatedly voted for governments that openly state they want settlement construction to kill any viable Palestinian state (Netanyahu and his far-right pals).
If the whole of Gaza can be held responsible for voting for Hamas in 2006 (and not once after since Hamas did away with elections), the whole of Isreal can be held accountable.
Yeah except the person you're responding to probably doesn't hold all of Gaza responsible for what Hamas has done since being voted into power.
Also, the Israeli left actually now has their own egotistically altruistic motive to shut down the settler shit, that being that shutting off the valve of right of return and no longer counting the votes of settlers in the west bank gives them an electoral edge.
And after the shit Bibi's pulled, you could bet good money that the courts would look the other way on them doing it too since the judges will for a long time see right wing governments as a threat to their judicial autonomy.
The United States regularly votes for warmongers and theocrats, it doesn't mean there aren't a lot of Americans who think they're wrong.
I don't think either population is morally responsible for what their so-called leaders do. Subsets of them, sure, but Israelis or Palestinians as a whole? Not a chance. People are not responsible for actions they had no hand in, or which they actively opposed.
I totally agree.
I'm just following the logic of those who claim the carpet bombing of Gaza is acceptable because the Palestinians once voted for Hamas.
A. It's not carpet bombing. Less than one casualty per bomb dropped even if you round up.
B. https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-nazi-case-for-hamas/
Any before and after photos of entire demolished Gaza neighbourhoods makes it clear what a farce your claim is.
May you never experience a true carpet bombing.
The death toll would be in the 100k+
In Dresden in the B link 60k died in one night.
Didn't work for his defense then doesn't now. It's the basis of the laws of war and Geneva Conventions.
As it turns out a place the size of jersey city with 500km of tunnels is entrenched
It's not a claim it's a fact that Gaza isn't being carpet bombed. Overlay the maps of damage from satellite imagery with where tunnels were known to be previously in public knowledge.
Really funny how people down vote you because they believe in collective punishment as long as it's the side they don't like.
Which is the status quo for the region.
Still doesn't change the Geneva Conventions definition of a military target.
Meanwhile over in Pakistan there's massive protests for Palestine nominally. As they are genociding 1.4 million Afghan refugees. https://www.rferl.org/a/pakistan-afghanistan-deportations-migrant-crackdown/32658618.html the stated reason is that the refugee population keeps suicide bombing stuff amongst other militant actions. Sound familiar?
And even this one is complex. A lot of the support for the settlers comes from American evangelical Christians. They believe that Jesus will come back under two conditions.
The first is that Jews run Israel. That's a check. The second is that Israel suffers a major attack. Well, that won't happen so that evangelicals send money to the settlers. Not only does it align with their "Israel should have the biblical borders" beliefs, but it adds fuel to the fire - worsening the conflict and making it more likely for a huge "Jesus will return this time" attack to happen.
They also support right wing Israeli politicians for the same reason. They don't want a guy running Israel who says "let's get a lasting peace with the Palestinians." They want a guy that says "I'll burn every Palestinian house to the ground and then burn the Palestinians themselves!"
This isn't meant to excuse actions by anyone else. It just shows that three situations are complex with a lot of people all over the place working against peace.
The settlers being referred to are Israeli.
Well, he won't, he's an arsehole.
"Stop genocideing quite so hard, Israel, you're making us look bad."
Riiiight... the US is so "upset" at Israel that they will only be giving Israel hundreds of billions in genocide money in the coming few years instead of trillions.
Riiiight.
Total aid to Israel since its inception is no where near 1 trillion dollars, let alone multiple trillions. We're currently in the range of $3.8B per year, which is a lot. In the 75 years or so that Israel has existed the US has given something on the order of $160B total.
Yes... that's sarcastic hyperbole on my part.
Try $317.9B.
Yitzhak Rabin
They're saying this just 70 - 80 years too late.
They’ve been saying this, and getting traction on it, for decades.
It’s really easy to tell the people who just became aware of issues in the region over the past few weeks.
Not really? They can be hardly said to be "saying it and getting traction" while arming Israel to the hilt. They have and have had massive leverage over Israel and have largely chosen empty symbolic gestures while continuing to prop up the occupying state.
Never going to happen. They are the US's stronghold in the Middle East.
...and the extremists running Israel, while he's at it
Or what?
Or we will send you weapons and ammunition, but we will look upset doing it
I don't think he has an interest.
Rein them in until the next news cycle, that is.
They have to appear as though they're doing something, then it's back to business as usual.
just draft them. problem "solved".
I dread to think what they would do in the military
Maybe the US should stop vetoing UN resolutions then.
Bruh israeli colonists are literally going around shooting people and throwing grenades in the west bank and the military is standing behind them to guard them from retaliation.
You're not gonna sit here and pretend israelis "get in trouble" for stealing Palestinian land. They get encouraged to do it.